Inthemiddle
Rookie
- Oct 4, 2011
- 6,354
- 675
- 0
- Banned
- #201
You quoted my points, what about addressing them?
Because your "points" (and I use that word loosely) aren't saying anything.
They actually do address "demand."
No, they don't.
Planning ahead and replacing oil we buy from bad governments.
Oil we buy from "bad" governments? Again, what part of DEMAND do you not understand? There is a SURPLUS of pipeline capacity from Canada to the US, which will take several years for DEMAND to reach. The DEMAND for shipping oil from Canada to the US is not there. It won't be there for several years.
The Keystone project will add more capacity, so much so that pipelines from Canada to the US will run 50% empty. This will drive operation costs up even farther on oil companies, driving up pump prices. Which puts more money in the hands of TransCanada, more money in the hands of "bad governments," more AMERICAN MONEY in everyone's pockets, while more Americans are out of work as a result. How in the world can anyone think that's a good idea?