Democrats refuse to accept that elections have consequences

[dudmuck]

we the people, did not choose president Trump

Yes we did. And we chose him in a landslide.

View attachment 236499

hmm?
65,844,610 Clinton
-62,979,636 Trump
=============
2,864,974

 

[RetiredGySgt]

we the people, did not choose president Trump

Yes we did. And we chose him in a landslide.

View attachment 236499

hmm?
65,844,610 Clinton
-62,979,636 Trump
=============
2,864,974

What part of popular vote has NEVER elected a President don't you get?

 

[P@triot]

hmm?
65,844,610 Clinton
-62,979,636 Trump
=============
2,864,974

Since Dumbocrats can’t read or do math, we like to provide them with pictures using only colors.

 

[OKTexas]

Wow, seems like you're the one that can't come to grips with the November 2018 mid-terms.

You'll find judges being confirmed at a record pace come Jan, 2018 assured that. Deal with it child.

.

 

[OKTexas]

The un patriotic do not remember the false count of ballots in Florida that got Bush appointed.

That's a pure LIE, every independent recount confirmed the Bush victory.

.

 

[OKTexas]

this is the problem with presidents who only win the electoral college and not the popular vote as well..

citizens don't take lightly, having their actual vote, cancelled out....

we the people, did not choose president Trump, we chose someone else by 3 million votes more, than the present incumbent got from we the people...

Same with GWBush, he lost the popular vote as well in 2000.... by half a million, to Al Gore....

These type of presidencies, although legitimately won thru the electoral college, but indirectly lost thru the popular vote, never bode well...

President Obama, by a landslide, won both the electoral college AND the popular vote....

HE HAD A MANDATE where he could legitimately say, elections have consequences because 'we the people', overwhelmingly voted for him....

this president, can never say that, about 'we the people' choosing him.... because we didn't.

we the people, did not choose president Trump, we chose someone else by 3 million votes more, than the present incumbent got from we the people...

Ah, the irrelevant crying, LOVE IT!!

.

 

[OKTexas]

this is the problem with presidents who only win the electoral college and not the popular vote as well..

citizens don't take lightly, having their actual vote, cancelled out....

we the people, did not choose president Trump, we chose someone else by 3 million votes more, than the present incumbent got from we the people...

Same with GWBush, he lost the popular vote as well in 2000.... by half a million, to Al Gore....

These type of presidencies, although legitimately won thru the electoral college, but indirectly lost thru the popular vote, never bode well...

President Obama, by a landslide, won both the electoral college AND the popular vote....

HE HAD A MANDATE where he could legitimately say, elections have consequences because 'we the people', overwhelmingly voted for him....

this president, can never say that, about 'we the people' choosing him.... because we didn't.

California is where those 3 million votes came from RETARD, before California was counted Trump was over a million votes ahead of Hilary try as hard as you want, ONE State does not elect our Presidents.

bull crud! every person's vote is EQUAL in the popular vote...

YOU DO NOT get to choose which people in which states should count, and which should not... silly one!

Except there is no such thing as a popular vote in a presidential election. When are you commies going to get that through your ignorant heads? The States elect presidents, not individual people.

.

 

[Care4all]

this is the problem with presidents who only win the electoral college and not the popular vote as well..

citizens don't take lightly, having their actual vote, cancelled out....

we the people, did not choose president Trump, we chose someone else by 3 million votes more, than the present incumbent got from we the people...

Same with GWBush, he lost the popular vote as well in 2000.... by half a million, to Al Gore....

These type of presidencies, although legitimately won thru the electoral college, but indirectly lost thru the popular vote, never bode well...

President Obama, by a landslide, won both the electoral college AND the popular vote....

HE HAD A MANDATE where he could legitimately say, elections have consequences because 'we the people', overwhelmingly voted for him....

this president, can never say that, about 'we the people' choosing him.... because we didn't.

California is where those 3 million votes came from RETARD, before California was counted Trump was over a million votes ahead of Hilary try as hard as you want, ONE State does not elect our Presidents.

bull crud! every person's vote is EQUAL in the popular vote...

YOU DO NOT get to choose which people in which states should count, and which should not... silly one!

Except there is no such thing as a popular vote in a presidential election. When are you commies going to get that through your ignorant heads? The States elect presidents, not individual people.

.

True, so why. Bother having it?

We are not picking our electors, we do not have their names on the ballot, which we originally had to vote for...?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Sure do...

Beat Republicans by 9 million votes in the last election

So now Democrats are a fraction of the way back from the crushing loses of the Obama era.

 

[OKTexas]

this is the problem with presidents who only win the electoral college and not the popular vote as well..

citizens don't take lightly, having their actual vote, cancelled out....

we the people, did not choose president Trump, we chose someone else by 3 million votes more, than the present incumbent got from we the people...

Same with GWBush, he lost the popular vote as well in 2000.... by half a million, to Al Gore....

These type of presidencies, although legitimately won thru the electoral college, but indirectly lost thru the popular vote, never bode well...

President Obama, by a landslide, won both the electoral college AND the popular vote....

HE HAD A MANDATE where he could legitimately say, elections have consequences because 'we the people', overwhelmingly voted for him....

this president, can never say that, about 'we the people' choosing him.... because we didn't.

California is where those 3 million votes came from RETARD, before California was counted Trump was over a million votes ahead of Hilary try as hard as you want, ONE State does not elect our Presidents.

bull crud! every person's vote is EQUAL in the popular vote...

YOU DO NOT get to choose which people in which states should count, and which should not... silly one!

Except there is no such thing as a popular vote in a presidential election. When are you commies going to get that through your ignorant heads? The States elect presidents, not individual people.

.

True, so why. Bother having it?

We are not picking our electors, we do not have their names on the ballot, which we originally had to vote for...?

We don't "have it", totaling State votes is irrelevant. Why would anyone think otherwise?

.

 

[P@triot]

True, so why. Bother having it?

So why bother whining about it? We have an Electoral College. It protects the people and all 50 states from two cities (NY and LA) controlling the entire massive nation. It has been that way since the beginning. The fact that you people still whine about it just proves the premise of this thread - you people can’t accept that elections have consequences.

Either end your bat-shit crazy policies to win over states like Texas, Florida, Ohio, etc. or accept the fact that the system exists and you refuse to work within it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Sure do...

Beat Republicans by 9 million votes in the last election

Gorsuch and kavanaugh





.

 

[P@triot]

Sure do... Beat Republicans by 9 million votes in the last election

Gorsuch and kavanaugh

Just imagine when President Trump nominates a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It will be surprising if she lives another couple of months.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Sure do... Beat Republicans by 9 million votes in the last election

Gorsuch and kavanaugh

Just imagine when President Trump nominates a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It will be surprising if she lives another couple of months.

I don't wish death on anyone..

But I knew bush SR was going to die soon after his wife died..

So Trump will get 3 ... harry Reid has to be the biggest asshole politician ever..


.

 

[P@triot]

The left just cannot accept not holding power over others...

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz issued a stark warning about special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation Friday following several major developments in the controversial investigation centering around Michael Cohen, the former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump. "I don't see any crimes," Dershowitz said. "Collusion itself is not a crime. Using information given by Russia to Wikileaks would not be a crime unless the campaign participated with Wikileaks in the hacking itself. There's no evidence to support that."

Left-wing, Harvard Law professor (and renowned criminal attorney) is on record stating over and over and over that there have been no crimes committed by President Trump or his administration. You cannot replace a sitting president simply because you are a whiny bitch who can't accept the results of an election. We the people have spoken, wing-nuts. Deal with it.

Alan Dershowitz shoots holes through newest major development in Mueller's investigation

 

[JoeB131]

They loved that phrase when Barack Insane Obama sat in the Oval Office. But after the American people spoke, and elected President Trump, the Democrats have refused to accept the results of the election or the voice of the people.

The American people said no to Trump, by 3 million votes.

They said no to him again by 10 million votes in the Mid-terms.

 

[JoeB131]

Left-wing, Harvard Law professor (and renowned criminal attorney) is on record stating over and over and over that there have been no crimes committed by President Trump or his administration.

He also claimed that OJ Simpson didn't kill anyone...

 

[Silhouette]

True, so why. Bother having it?

So why bother whining about it? We have an Electoral College. It protects the people and all 50 states from two cities (NY and LA) controlling the entire massive nation. It has been that way since the beginning.
.

Yep. The Founding Fathers recognized that a nation of diverse thought and equal weight would be the healthiest for the longevity of true democracy. No doubt the LGBT cult would like to eliminate all powers of voting except from New York (City), West Hollywood and San Francisco CA.

Heck, New York City even allows its taverns with liquor licenses to have child pornographic live shows on Saturday nights. Shock: 11 year old perform in drag stage at NYC Gay club

That would be the "new normal" if the electoral college was gone... Food for thought. And speaking of food, did you know that the New York State Liquor Authority yanked a license merely for a tavern changing its food menu without notifying the Authority? Strange set of priorities there...

 

[Care4all]

we don't elect our electors thru elections anymore, who then elected our presidents...

the electoral college created by our founders is dead... the whole process is not even similar to what our founders created for us

 

[P@triot]

the electoral college created by our founders is dead... the whole process is not even similar to what our founders created for us

The system currently functions exactly as it was intended. You should take some classes on history before commenting on history.