Democrats Hold the Senate, as Cortez Masto Ekes Out a Victory in Nevada

We see various races where a Republican was comfortably ahead in the polls, only to be declared the loser. (in states where Democrats control the election process.)
With polls being answered primarily by Democrats, (since Republicans don't trust the media pollers), when a Republican is ahead in the polls, you can be sure he/she will win (as long as there isn't cheating going on. Ho hum.

And then you prove my point that the only fraud here is you.
 
You just proved that YOU are the fraud.

This from the guy that thinks polls prove election fraud!

giphy.gif
 
This from the guy that thinks polls prove election fraud!
Well, what do you call it when polls show a Republican well ahead of the Democrat opponent, only to have that Republican be declared the loser ? Pretty good proof, I'd say. What would you need to see ?

And these from the same states that had fraud issues in the 2020 election >>

Nevada
A lawyer for the Trump campaign alleges that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.

Voting machines were not secure or password protected, according to a Trump campaign attorney at a Dec. 3 court hearing, and votes disappeared on machines between logging off and logging in. However, they point out they cannot get access to the machines to examine and figure out why.

Watch the court hearing

There was an inexplicable jump in voter registrations with unusual addresses and incomplete information. That's according to an affidavit filed by a data scientist who said there was a “historically strange” spike of 13,000 voters who registered with missing information, such as gender and age. There were also registrations that used casinos and RV parks as their address.

The Trump campaign claims gift cards and other incentives given away in a a get-out-the-vote effort aimed at Native Americans was illegal. The organizing group says it is not.

Read More

Read More

Republicans say they identified several thousand voters who appear to have cast ballots after they moved from Nevada.

The Voter Integrity Project says 8,443 people who voted in Nevada did not meet the legal residency requirements.

At a hearing, the Trump campaign said over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, 42,248 people voted more than once, of those who are on record as not voting: 1% actually did, and 2% of those who supposedly voted by mail say they never got a ballot.

All these discrepancies were tilted in Joe Biden's favor.

Arizona
An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level. The allegation coincides with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night.

According to the email, discussed at a hearing, Pima County Democrats held a meeting on Sept. 10, 2020 in which plans were detailed to illegally inject 35,000 votes for each Democrat at the outset in statistically adjusted embeds that could be written off as human error if audited.

There was no proper validation of 1.9 million signatures on mail in ballots.

Dominion machines were connected to the internet, according to a witness at a GOP hearing, raising serious security issues.

A hearing witness states she was instructed to allow people to vote who were not registered in the state, who were not on the voter rolls, who had out of state driver's licenses, who not had been residents long enough, who had not registered in time or who said they were registered in another state. However, pro-Trump voters from other counties were sent away, she says. She also says somebody apparently brought homeless people from outside the precinct in to vote. She also says 13,000 votes, when counted, were unobserved by Republicans.

She says just what she personally observed over five hours in one day impacted approximately 2,000 votes. She also said a poll observer for Democrats from California told her he was there "to help turn this precinct blue... this is one of our problem ones." He told her they were also focusing on Maricopa County.

A Republican Party leader says she watched votes for Trump be changed to or counted for Biden once they were place in the machine. In a lawsuit, she also says in parts of Maricopa County there were not proper safeguards verifying that mail-in ballots came from registered voters. She also says Republicans were not allowed a proper view of the counting process. (More to come from Arizona hearing soon...)

Watch: Arizona hearing

State officials blame “a data error” for conflicting and fluctuating results in one county that dropped the appearance of Biden’s lead by 6,000 votes, and then posted it back again.
 
Last edited:
Got 3M fewer votes in 2016
Got 8M fewer votes in 2020

Your blob is consistent at getting fewer votes than the people he runs against.
You are consistent in pretending your numbers are correct. Ho hum. yawn****

Any more compliments for the criminal Whie House hijacker, with the brains falling out of his head ? Got any idea how many crimes the House charging him with ?

 
Last edited:
Well, what do you call it when polls show a Republican well ahead of the Democrat opponent, only to have that Republican be declared the loser ? Pretty good proof, I'd say. What would you need to see ?

And these from the same states that had fraud issues in the 2020 election >>

Nevada
A lawyer for the Trump campaign alleges that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.

Voting machines were not secure or password protected, according to a Trump campaign attorney at a Dec. 3 court hearing, and votes disappeared on machines between logging off and logging in. However, they point out they cannot get access to the machines to examine and figure out why.

Watch the court hearing

There was an inexplicable jump in voter registrations with unusual addresses and incomplete information. That's according to an affidavit filed by a data scientist who said there was a “historically strange” spike of 13,000 voters who registered with missing information, such as gender and age. There were also registrations that used casinos and RV parks as their address.

The Trump campaign claims gift cards and other incentives given away in a a get-out-the-vote effort aimed at Native Americans was illegal. The organizing group says it is not.

Read More

Read More

Republicans say they identified several thousand voters who appear to have cast ballots after they moved from Nevada.

The Voter Integrity Project says 8,443 people who voted in Nevada did not meet the legal residency requirements.

At a hearing, the Trump campaign said over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, 42,248 people voted more than once, of those who are on record as not voting: 1% actually did, and 2% of those who supposedly voted by mail say they never got a ballot.

All these discrepancies were tilted in Joe Biden's favor.

Arizona
An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level. The allegation coincides with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night.

According to the email, discussed at a hearing, Pima County Democrats held a meeting on Sept. 10, 2020 in which plans were detailed to illegally inject 35,000 votes for each Democrat at the outset in statistically adjusted embeds that could be written off as human error if audited.

There was no proper validation of 1.9 million signatures on mail in ballots.

Dominion machines were connected to the internet, according to a witness at a GOP hearing, raising serious security issues.

A hearing witness states she was instructed to allow people to vote who were not registered in the state, who were not on the voter rolls, who had out of state driver's licenses, who not had been residents long enough, who had not registered in time or who said they were registered in another state. However, pro-Trump voters from other counties were sent away, she says. She also says somebody apparently brought homeless people from outside the precinct in to vote. She also says 13,000 votes, when counted, were unobserved by Republicans.

She says just what she personally observed over five hours in one day impacted approximately 2,000 votes. She also said a poll observer for Democrats from California told her he was there "to help turn this precinct blue... this is one of our problem ones." He told her they were also focusing on Maricopa County.

A Republican Party leader says she watched votes for Trump be changed to or counted for Biden once they were place in the machine. In a lawsuit, she also says in parts of Maricopa County there were not proper safeguards verifying that mail-in ballots came from registered voters. She also says Republicans were not allowed a proper view of the counting process. (More to come from Arizona hearing soon...)

Watch: Arizona hearing

State officials blame “a data error” for conflicting and fluctuating results in one county that dropped the appearance of Biden’s lead by 6,000 votes, and then posted it back again.

Those are some very nice stories, but stories are all they are.

If any are ever actually proven a court of law, be sure to let us all know
 
You are consistent in pretending your numbers are correct. Ho hum. yawn****

Any more compliments for the criminal Whie House hijacker, with the brains falling out of his head ? Got any idea how many crimes the House charging him with ?


The House cannot charge anyone with a crime, they are not a law enforcement nor justice department agency.

But I am pumped that they are going to spend their time going after Hunter.
 
Well, yeah they. That is how we determine crimes in this country.

Anything outside of the courts is just story telling, like you did in your post above.

Wrong again.
No, YOU are wrong. Actually, the courts are exactly the place NOT to determine election fraud, as defined by the courts themselves, which have divorced election fraud from their courtrooms, & do not examine it, to keep politics out of the courtroom.

Election fraud is determined quite easily by a few simple circumstances.
1. Election "results" do not correlate with govt, private, & exit polls.
2. Polls showing Republicans leading are obviously correct (as most Republicans don't answer polls)
3, Various anomalies as outlined in Post # 226.
 
No, YOU are wrong. Actually, the courts are exactly the place NOT to determine election fraud, as defined by the courts themselves, which have divorced election fraud from their courtrooms, & do not examine it, to keep politics out of the courtroom.

Election fraud is determined quite easily by a few simple circumstances.
1. Election "results" do not correlate with govt, private, & exit polls.
2. Polls showing Republicans leading are obviously correct (as most Republicans don't answer polls)
3, Various anomalies as outlined in Post # 226.

Yep, none of those things prove a damn fucking thing. All you have are your feelings that there was fraud.

And still, far and away the funniest part is you think that polls being wrong prove election fraud, but only when they are wrong about Repubs.

giphy.gif
 
Yep, none of those things prove a damn fucking thing. All you have are your feelings that there was fraud.

And still, far and away the funniest part is you think that polls being wrong prove election fraud, but only when they are wrong about Repubs.
Either you are 1) the dullest knife in the drawer, or 2) you have a very short memory, or 3) you're full of crap.

Looks to me like # 3 is the case here, as it was only 22 minutes ago that I stated why polls are wrong about Republicans and not Democrats > because generally, "most Republicans don't answer polls".

Not too swift to post stuff that has already been explained/refuted repeatedly. (post 212, 218 219, 237)

1668794268760.png
 
Last edited:
Looks to me like # 3 is the case here, as it was only 22 minutes ago that I stated why polls are wrong about Republicans and not Democrats > because generally, "most Republicans don't answer polls".

Which of course is total fucking bullshit, but that does not stop you from parroting your talking points.
 

Forum List

Back
Top