ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #21
The real question is why does TM hate JFK?
lol.
Because JFK is right of Romney today. LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The real question is why does TM hate JFK?
lol.
with this statement:
"the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the (tax) rates now."
Why or why not?
You are aware the statement you do not agree with was from JFK right.
and you don't even know what Facts are. The Facts are clear. No matter how many times you guys try to spin them.
Yea, that JFK thingy, that's a troubling thing isn't it? You do realize when JFK pushed for lower tax rates that the highest tax rate was 91%, right? .
You do realize that there were many more Deductions and Loop holes then and NOBODY was actually paying 91% right. The Effective real Tax Rate then for the Top after all Deductions and Loop holes was more like 40%.
Your Intellectual Dishonesty on this subject betrays you as a Partisan Hack.
with this statement:
"the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the (tax) rates now."
Why or why not?
utter bullshit because it has failed in practice over and over again
Look at Southern Europe economically. Too much spending and to high taxes are the problem.
The real question is why does TM hate JFK?
lol.
Because JFK is right of Romney today. LOL
Kennedy was talking about the early sixties economy.
NOT EVERY situation like you idiots claim
The real question is why does TM hate JFK?
lol.
Because JFK is right of Romney today. LOL
Hmm... Mitt is pretty much Obama, per policy... I can't agree that JFK who was far more conservative than MItt, Bush, Newt, Santorum and Palin combined is like Mitt of today.
Ok, a bit of honesty here.
Cutting taxes is not the answer, its part of the answer.
Obama cuts taxes through deficit building tax credits, Obama also extended the Bush era tax cuts. Obama has no real plans to raise anyones taxes, he will borrow or print money and let inflation do the taxing.
What you have to do is get rid of poor/bad/destructive regulations then you balance the budget by matching the incoming revenues to that of what you spend. THEN you cuts taxes if possible. All this is easily done if you follow the constitution and the powers given to the federal Government.
What we have today us a gimmick system where cutting taxes buys votes on a mass scale, so even the tax and spend democrats are really just cut taxes and spend like the Republicans of Bush and his congress. Notice tax cuts get talked about for the 2 largest groups, middle class and the poor, even though the poor pay near or no taxes? Its a scam.
Regulation is pure corruption and getting rid of bad regulation buys almost no votes, hence the mass amounts of regulations passed every year and the zero regulations cut.
Spending for the first time is becoming an issue on a level where it could lose you more votes than it gains . That is why we are having such a divide in our nation. Politicians for the first time cant talk about balancing a budget then grow it without repercussions.
The spending is important because now politicians have to pretend how to get it under control. So of course they claim tax the rich, the smallest voter block (shocking) while still talking about giving tax breaks to the middle class and poor . See how this is working?
The issue of course is people are aware that taxing the rich wont even cover 1% of the deficit we run, so the divide is growing. No cuts are offered and whey they are they are so minor and take place over such a long period of time that in fact the cuts dont even keep up with spending growth.
So lets argue about tax cuts because thats what politicians are banking on, that you, the stupid masses care more about who gets tax cuts and who has to pay taxes than actually balancing the budget, you know, the thing that we run up when we dont collect enough taxes. Keep people focused on Democrats hating the rich or Republicans hating the poor that way we can still pass Obamacare, wars, welfare and more spending that even a unavoidable 50% taxe on everyone couldnt pay for.
with this statement:
"the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the (tax) rates now."
Why or why not?
supply side ecomonics is based on lies
Because JFK is right of Romney today. LOL
Hmm... Mitt is pretty much Obama, per policy... I can't agree that JFK who was far more conservative than MItt, Bush, Newt, Santorum and Palin combined is like Mitt of today.
How in the world can you even to consider that one man is the same as the other in every aspect?
You never studied philosophy.
Ok, a bit of honesty here.
Cutting taxes is not the answer, its part of the answer.
Obama cuts taxes through deficit building tax credits, Obama also extended the Bush era tax cuts. Obama has no real plans to raise anyones taxes, he will borrow or print money and let inflation do the taxing.
What you have to do is get rid of poor/bad/destructive regulations then you balance the budget by matching the incoming revenues to that of what you spend. THEN you cuts taxes if possible. All this is easily done if you follow the constitution and the powers given to the federal Government.
What we have today us a gimmick system where cutting taxes buys votes on a mass scale, so even the tax and spend democrats are really just cut taxes and spend like the Republicans of Bush and his congress. Notice tax cuts get talked about for the 2 largest groups, middle class and the poor, even though the poor pay near or no taxes? Its a scam.
Regulation is pure corruption and getting rid of bad regulation buys almost no votes, hence the mass amounts of regulations passed every year and the zero regulations cut.
Spending for the first time is becoming an issue on a level where it could lose you more votes than it gains . That is why we are having such a divide in our nation. Politicians for the first time cant talk about balancing a budget then grow it without repercussions.
The spending is important because now politicians have to pretend how to get it under control. So of course they claim tax the rich, the smallest voter block (shocking) while still talking about giving tax breaks to the middle class and poor . See how this is working?
The issue of course is people are aware that taxing the rich wont even cover 1% of the deficit we run, so the divide is growing. No cuts are offered and whey they are they are so minor and take place over such a long period of time that in fact the cuts dont even keep up with spending growth.
So lets argue about tax cuts because thats what politicians are banking on, that you, the stupid masses care more about who gets tax cuts and who has to pay taxes than actually balancing the budget, you know, the thing that we run up when we dont collect enough taxes. Keep people focused on Democrats hating the rich or Republicans hating the poor that way we can still pass Obamacare, wars, welfare and more spending that even a unavoidable 50% taxe on everyone couldnt pay for.
Again your assumption is based on opinion not fact.
Just because you believe it to be so does not make it as such.
We as a nation have been here before, after WWII the tax rate was very high, guess what, didn't stop us from becoming a super power. Did not stop economic increase.
with this statement:
"the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the (tax) rates now."
Why or why not?
Show where tax cuts have ever paid for themselves, without creative book keeping that is.