Democratic politicians jumping with glee over Iraq falling!!!

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
28,483
10,051
900
Even though the below Democrats URGED the removal of Saddam they politicized the Liberation of Iraq thus causing millions of deaths!
A) These comments PUSHED for the removal of Saddam...
32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998 WHERE'D SHE GET THIS INFORMATION BEFORE BUSH?
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.



SO once Iraq was liberated on May 2003 "Mission Accomplished".. these traitor democrats working with the biased MSM helped the barbarians
to prolong the conflict causing 4,000 more US deaths.

Making these comments encouraged barbarians to expand!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

and when these statements are made most normal intelligent people would say..."geez doesn't this just help the terrorists in killing more troops"?
FACT:LOOK at this Harvard study found here THE "EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT"

asked: "Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?

The short answer is YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy
research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.

STUDY ABSTRACT
Are insurgents affected by information on US casualty sensitivity? Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war. (wouldn't you conclude the next president accusing the US military of methodically and systematically air raiding villages killing civilians.. dissent???) We find in periods after a spike in war-critical statements, insurgent attacks increases by 5-10 percent.

So when Reid, et.al. made statements that were NEGATIVE about our military... you don't think the terrorists USED that crap??

Our troops are demoralized. The terrorists happy! And millions die!
 
If after WWII/Korea if the USA had not left a permanent force what would have happened there?

The Werewolves specialised in ambushes and sniping, and took the lives of many Allied and Soviet soldiers and officers -- perhaps even that of the first Soviet commandant of Berlin, General N.E. Berzarin, who was rumoured to have been waylaid in Charlottenburg during an incident in June 1945. Buildings housing Allied and Soviet staffs were favourite targets for Werewolf bombings; an explosion in the Bremen police headquarters, also in June 1945, killed five Americans and thirty-nine Germans. Techniques for harassing the occupiers were given widespread publicity through Werewolf leaflets and radio propaganda, and long after May 1945 the sabotage methods promoted by the Werewolves were still .....
Minutemen of the Third Reich ("Werewolf" guerilla movement - postwar sabotage & terror not new)
 
What is incredible is that it is falling on Obama's watch and he has done not one thing we know of to help. Apparently that is what he wanted all along.

Failure in Iraq, failure in Afghanistan and failure to protect our southern border. Nothing but failure for Obama.

One humorous defense I read was that Bush failed to supply enough troops to defend the peace. Well as far as I know there are NONE now.
 
What is incredible is that it is falling on Obama's watch and he has done not one thing we know of to help. Apparently that is what he wanted all along.

Failure in Iraq, failure in Afghanistan and failure to protect our southern border. Nothing but failure for Obama.

One humorous defense I read was that Bush failed to supply enough troops to defend the peace. Well as far as I know there are NONE now.

How many idiots including Obama, Reid, Kerry....all clamoring for withdrawal of troops IN SPITE of military leaders protest now are asking
what can we do???
These idiots obviously NEVER heard of USA permanent troops in Europe/Asia 50 years after WWII ended!
 
What is incredible is that it is falling on Obama's watch and he has done not one thing we know of to help. Apparently that is what he wanted all along.

Failure in Iraq, failure in Afghanistan and failure to protect our southern border. Nothing but failure for Obama.

One humorous defense I read was that Bush failed to supply enough troops to defend the peace. Well as far as I know there are NONE now.

How many idiots including Obama, Reid, Kerry....all clamoring for withdrawal of troops IN SPITE of military leaders protest now are asking
what can we do???
These idiots obviously NEVER heard of USA permanent troops in Europe/Asia 50 years after WWII ended!

They don't care about no brown skinned people they have a brown skinned friend in the WH to protect. I am not sure of Obama's reluctance to use drones. Hell he will kill Americans in ally countries but not protect an ally such as Iraq? WTF is wrong with him?
 
What is incredible is that it is falling on Obama's watch and he has done not one thing we know of to help. Apparently that is what he wanted all along.

Failure in Iraq, failure in Afghanistan and failure to protect our southern border. Nothing but failure for Obama.

One humorous defense I read was that Bush failed to supply enough troops to defend the peace. Well as far as I know there are NONE now.

How many idiots including Obama, Reid, Kerry....all clamoring for withdrawal of troops IN SPITE of military leaders protest now are asking
what can we do???
These idiots obviously NEVER heard of USA permanent troops in Europe/Asia 50 years after WWII ended!

They don't care about no brown skinned people they have a brown skinned friend in the WH to protect. I am not sure of Obama's reluctance to use drones. Hell he will kill Americans in ally countries but not protect an ally such as Iraq? WTF is wrong with him?

Nothing is wrong with him, trying to quit being the world's policeman is the correct course of action.
 
How many idiots including Obama, Reid, Kerry....all clamoring for withdrawal of troops IN SPITE of military leaders protest now are asking
what can we do???
These idiots obviously NEVER heard of USA permanent troops in Europe/Asia 50 years after WWII ended!

They don't care about no brown skinned people they have a brown skinned friend in the WH to protect. I am not sure of Obama's reluctance to use drones. Hell he will kill Americans in ally countries but not protect an ally such as Iraq? WTF is wrong with him?

Nothing is wrong with him, trying to quit being the world's policeman is the correct course of action.

So if Russia attacked Germany we would not be the policemen and help our ally?
 
They don't care about no brown skinned people they have a brown skinned friend in the WH to protect. I am not sure of Obama's reluctance to use drones. Hell he will kill Americans in ally countries but not protect an ally such as Iraq? WTF is wrong with him?

Nothing is wrong with him, trying to quit being the world's policeman is the correct course of action.

So if Russia attacked Germany we would not be the policemen and help our ally?

NATO would be the policeman with the USA as a member of NATO be on patrol!
 
Well this thread's OP is laced with dishonesty. It starts with the title of the thread and continues with conjecture from that point on.

Laced with "dishonesty"???
WERE THESE democrats "dishonest"?? BEFORE BUSH!!

32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998 WHERE'D SHE GET THIS INFORMATION BEFORE BUSH?
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.
 
They don't care about no brown skinned people they have a brown skinned friend in the WH to protect. I am not sure of Obama's reluctance to use drones. Hell he will kill Americans in ally countries but not protect an ally such as Iraq? WTF is wrong with him?

Nothing is wrong with him, trying to quit being the world's policeman is the correct course of action.

So if Russia attacked Germany we would not be the policemen and help our ally?

Probably, but that would not be a good parallel to the fucked-up situation in the middle east where the Chaos is mostly because of western intervention. It should end but when? Maybe when we have president courageous enough to endure accusations of cowardice from the shitty warhawks?
 
You have to be a loon to think a political hearsay caused "millions of deaths!"

Fuggin loser
 
Nothing is wrong with him, trying to quit being the world's policeman is the correct course of action.

So if Russia attacked Germany we would not be the policemen and help our ally?

Probably, but that would not be a good parallel to the fucked-up situation in the middle east where the Chaos is mostly because of western intervention. It should end but when? Maybe when we have president courageous enough to endure accusations of cowardice from the shitty warhawks?

Why is it not a parallel?
We are talking about today 2014.
How did you get around today? By car probably that uses gas.
During 1991 the USA depended on a large % of oil coming from Middle East (ME).
Not wanting to see same gas lines I lived through in the 70s because of ME crisis the USA/Coalition drove Iraq out of Kuwait.
Saddam agreed to the 1991 Cease FIRE.. Do you understand what a "Cease Fire" is?
It didn't mean Saddam surrendered. It meant no more "firing"... unless either side started firing again..
Which Saddam did!
And after a growing democrat clamor see below quotes especially after 9/11.. (remember that?) Remember Anthrax attacks? Who did we
think was behind it all? Saddam! And did he refute he had WMDs? NO because he let 500,000 kids starve just because HE WOULDN'T
sign the certification that Iraq had no WMDs. He refused certify and willing to let 100,000 kids a year starve.
So you tell me, back in 2001 after all the below democrats wanting Saddam removed, and Saddam refusing to certify destruction of WMDs..
WITH all the information at your fingertips as these 32 democrat quotes illustrate what would you do THEN not NOW!!!
Knowing that Saddam was willing to let 100,000 kids starve.. what would you do???

32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998 WHERE'D SHE GET THIS INFORMATION BEFORE BUSH?
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.
 
You have to be a loon to think a political hearsay caused "millions of deaths!"

Fuggin loser


Although Iraq earned billions in revenue under the Oil-for-Food program in 2000, only about 33 percent was spent on food and 2 percent on medical supplies
In five years 576,000 children starved BECAUSE SADDAM refused to certify WMD destruction!
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports - NYTimes.com

5 years an average of 100,000 children starved under Saddam! All Saddam had to do is CERTIFY THERE WERE NO WMDs!

But since he didn't IF Saddam had not been removed and was still in power today.. that
is 2014 less 2000 or 14 years at 100,000 per year or 1.4 million children STARVED IF Democrats had their way and especially YOU had your way and your
leader and idol Saddam was still in power which is what you wanted! RIGHT???
 

Forum List

Back
Top