Democrat politicians set to rob the public to pay reperations to slaves.

[Stuartbirdan2]

Look them up, or you can just read what the founders had to say about them in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers.

Or maybe we live in a modern society, and we have to do what works for us, and not a bunch of dead slave rapists who shit in chamber pots.

So what you're saying is a written Constitution was an exercise in futility, because you commies are going to do what ever the fuck you want anyways. Are you aware the founders provided an orderly way to change the Constitution to meet the needs of the country?

.

Intent
With respect to the meaning of “the general welfare” the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;608 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.609 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies610 and for an ever-increasing variety of “internal improvements”611 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.612 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace

Since Madison wrote most of the Constitution, I'd say he would have the best understanding of it.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

So Hamilton and Madison disagreed about the interpretation of what they both wrote. When there is such a disagreement who decides which interpretation is correct? Scotus

The early supreme court agreed with Madison. Hamilton was a statist like you commies.

.

n Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the final hours of the Adams administration. When James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, refused to deliver Marbury’s commission, Marbury, joined by three other similarly situated appointees, petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the commissions

Marbury v. Madison - Definition, Summary & Significance

The 1803 United States court case between William Marbury and James Madison (Marbury v. Madison) established that U.S. courts hold the power to strike down laws, statutes and some government actions that are deemed unconstitutional.

www.history.com

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Look them up, or you can just read what the founders had to say about them in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers.

Or maybe we live in a modern society, and we have to do what works for us, and not a bunch of dead slave rapists who shit in chamber pots.

So what you're saying is a written Constitution was an exercise in futility, because you commies are going to do what ever the fuck you want anyways. Are you aware the founders provided an orderly way to change the Constitution to meet the needs of the country?

.

Intent
With respect to the meaning of “the general welfare” the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;608 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.609 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies610 and for an ever-increasing variety of “internal improvements”611 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.612 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace

Since Madison wrote most of the Constitution, I'd say he would have the best understanding of it.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

So Hamilton and Madison disagreed about the interpretation of what they both wrote. When there is such a disagreement who decides which interpretation is correct? Scotus

The early supreme court agreed with Madison. Hamilton was a statist like you commies.

.

Look them up, or you can just read what the founders had to say about them in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers.

Or maybe we live in a modern society, and we have to do what works for us, and not a bunch of dead slave rapists who shit in chamber pots.

So what you're saying is a written Constitution was an exercise in futility, because you commies are going to do what ever the fuck you want anyways. Are you aware the founders provided an orderly way to change the Constitution to meet the needs of the country?

.

Intent
With respect to the meaning of “the general welfare” the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;608 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.609 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies610 and for an ever-increasing variety of “internal improvements”611 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.612 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace

Since Madison wrote most of the Constitution, I'd say he would have the best understanding of it.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

So Hamilton and Madison disagreed about the interpretation of what they both wrote. When there is such a disagreement who decides which interpretation is correct? Scotus

The early supreme court agreed with Madison. Hamilton was a statist like you commies.

.

And one of the two principal authors of the Constitution

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Look them up, or you can just read what the founders had to say about them in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers.

Or maybe we live in a modern society, and we have to do what works for us, and not a bunch of dead slave rapists who shit in chamber pots.

So what you're saying is a written Constitution was an exercise in futility, because you commies are going to do what ever the fuck you want anyways. Are you aware the founders provided an orderly way to change the Constitution to meet the needs of the country?

.

Intent
With respect to the meaning of “the general welfare” the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;608 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.609 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies610 and for an ever-increasing variety of “internal improvements”611 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.612 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace

Since Madison wrote most of the Constitution, I'd say he would have the best understanding of it.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

So Hamilton and Madison disagreed about the interpretation of what they both wrote. When there is such a disagreement who decides which interpretation is correct? Scotus

The early supreme court agreed with Madison. Hamilton was a statist like you commies.

.

Hamilton was a communist? Link?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Look them up, or you can just read what the founders had to say about them in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers.

Or maybe we live in a modern society, and we have to do what works for us, and not a bunch of dead slave rapists who shit in chamber pots.

So what you're saying is a written Constitution was an exercise in futility, because you commies are going to do what ever the fuck you want anyways. Are you aware the founders provided an orderly way to change the Constitution to meet the needs of the country?

.

Intent
With respect to the meaning of “the general welfare” the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;608 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.609 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies610 and for an ever-increasing variety of “internal improvements”611 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.612 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace

Since Madison wrote most of the Constitution, I'd say he would have the best understanding of it.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

So Hamilton and Madison disagreed about the interpretation of what they both wrote. When there is such a disagreement who decides which interpretation is correct? Scotus

The early supreme court agreed with Madison. Hamilton was a statist like you commies.

.

Alexander Hamilton on the $10 Bill - Teaching History With ...https://teachinghistorywithhamilton.org › 2018/07PDF
Alexander Hamilton on the $10 Bill: How He Got There and Why It Matters by Brian Phillips Murphy. 2015 was a big year for Alexander Hamilton. Nearly two .

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah, losers always make excuses for trying to take short cuts not provided in the rules. You do know what's that's called right, cheating. And last I heard the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to Russians or Chinese unless they are on US soil. So you got anymore lame assed excuses not to follow the Supreme Law of the Land? Well other than it's just too damn hard, as consensus always is.

Actually, it isn't hard at all. The First Amendment calls for freedom of the press. It doesn't say a thing about freedom of the internet. So if internet companies want to ban Trump because he incites racism and riots, have at it.

 

[JoeB131]

Should the government regulate content on the net?

I wouldn't have a problem with that. I think it would be better if the tech giants self-regulated.

In the 1920's, there were a lot of scandals about what was going into movies, and debauched behavior in Hollywood. The government threatened regulation, but the movie industry cleaned up it's act with the Hayes Code.

In the 1950's, there was a lot of concern about comic books causing Juvenile delinquency. The government made some noises about stepping in, but the Comic Book Industry imposed the Comic Books Code to clean up their act.

In the 1980's, people were concerned about obscene lyrics in music, old Tipper Gore made some noise, but in the end, the Music industry cleaned up it's own house.

We are already seeing the Tech giants clean up their act. PornHub recently removed 90% of it's content to get off all the revenge porn and other content it couldn't vouch for. They probably went into overkill. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter are all finally starting to clean up their acts.

Much like Movies, Comic Books and Rock music, the edges get bumped up against, but eventually, public demand gets them to clean up their act.

 

[JoeB131]

Facebook is doing something about it

Too bad they didn't do something about it in 2016.

 

[kaz]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

 

[OKTexas]

Yeah, losers always make excuses for trying to take short cuts not provided in the rules. You do know what's that's called right, cheating. And last I heard the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to Russians or Chinese unless they are on US soil. So you got anymore lame assed excuses not to follow the Supreme Law of the Land? Well other than it's just too damn hard, as consensus always is.

Actually, it isn't hard at all. The First Amendment calls for freedom of the press. It doesn't say a thing about freedom of the internet. So if internet companies want to ban Trump because he incites racism and riots, have at it.

So you want tech oligarchs deciding what YOU can and can't say online. GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Should the government regulate content on the net?

I wouldn't have a problem with that. I think it would be better if the tech giants self-regulated.

In the 1920's, there were a lot of scandals about what was going into movies, and debauched behavior in Hollywood. The government threatened regulation, but the movie industry cleaned up it's act with the Hayes Code.

In the 1950's, there was a lot of concern about comic books causing Juvenile delinquency. The government made some noises about stepping in, but the Comic Book Industry imposed the Comic Books Code to clean up their act.

In the 1980's, people were concerned about obscene lyrics in music, old Tipper Gore made some noise, but in the end, the Music industry cleaned up it's own house.

We are already seeing the Tech giants clean up their act. PornHub recently removed 90% of it's content to get off all the revenge porn and other content it couldn't vouch for. They probably went into overkill. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter are all finally starting to clean up their acts.

Much like Movies, Comic Books and Rock music, the edges get bumped up against, but eventually, public demand gets them to clean up their act.

I would. Scary stuff

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Yeah, losers always make excuses for trying to take short cuts not provided in the rules. You do know what's that's called right, cheating. And last I heard the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to Russians or Chinese unless they are on US soil. So you got anymore lame assed excuses not to follow the Supreme Law of the Land? Well other than it's just too damn hard, as consensus always is.

Actually, it isn't hard at all. The First Amendment calls for freedom of the press. It doesn't say a thing about freedom of the internet. So if internet companies want to ban Trump because he incites racism and riots, have at it.

So you want tech oligarchs deciding what YOU can and can't say online. GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.

That's called capitalism

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

Homophobia

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

Attorney: Transgender Ohio Oath Keeper Vulnerable in Jail

Watkins said she worries for her safety.

spectrumnews1.com

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook is doing something about it

Too bad they didn't do something about it in 2016.

The riot hurt the cause of the fascists

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

Activity

Although QAnon followers are primarily active online, apart from displaying logos and merchandise at public rallies, in several cases the conspiracy theory has spilled into the real world with violent consequences. In August last year, Yahoo! News reported that the FBI considers “conspiracy-driven domestic extremism” to be a growing threat. An FBI intelligence bulletin, written by the bureau’s Phoenix field office and obtained by Yahoo News, specifically mentioned QAnon and explained, “The FBI assesses these conspiracy theories very likely will emerge, spread, and evolve in the modern information marketplace, occasionally driving both groups and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts.”

While most QAnon believers are not violent and limit their involvement to furthering the conspiracy online, a number of real-world events have borne out the FBI’s warning.

August 12, 2020, Waco, Texas: Police arrested and charged 30-year-old Cecilia Celeste Fulbright with driving while intoxicated and aggravated assault after she chased two cars and crashed into one. Fulbright claimed she was attempting to “save a child from pedophiles.” Fulbright’s social media history indicates that she was deeply influenced by the QAnon conspiracy theory. She once wrote in a text message to an acquaintance that President Trump was “literally taking down the cabal and the pedophile ring.” This paranoid obsession with pedophiles and child trafficking is common within QAnon. A former roommate said Fulbright had a history of untreated mental health issues

You are being redirected...

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook is doing something about it

Too bad they didn't do something about it in 2016.

Trump is hurting the gop

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook is doing something about it

Too bad they didn't do something about it in 2016.

The problem is not free speech. It is voter self-suppression

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook is doing something about it

Too bad they didn't do something about it in 2016.

The voters have not punished the fascists severely enough

 

[kaz]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

Homophobia

What does that mean? You Qnut guys hate gays?

 

[kaz]

.

Later decisions either have overturned or have undermined all of these holdings. The gathering of news by a press association and its transmission to client newspapers are interstate commerce.678 The activities of Group Health Association, Inc., which serves only its own members, are “trade” and capable of becoming interstate commerce;679 the business of insurance when transacted between an insurer and an insured in different states is interstate commerce.680 But most important of all there was the development of, or more accurately the return to,681 the rationales by which manufacturing,682 mining,683 business transactions,684 and the like, which are antecedent to or subsequent to a move across state lines, are conceived to be part of an integrated commercial whole and therefore subject to the reach of the commerce power

Clause III

www.law.cornell.edu

Promote is not used in that clause shitforbrains2. So what's your point commie?

.

Stewie thinks that the Constitution was written to protect government from the people

Do you condemn the oath keeper?

500 people have been arrested in Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, Attorney General Merrick Garland says

The number of arrests linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by supporters of then-President Donald Trump has reached 500, Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

www.cnbc.com

I don't know who that is. This is another of your boogiemen, isn't it?

Say high to Q for me, Qnut

You are being redirected...

You go girl. You do love Q, don't you Qnut?

Attorney: Transgender Ohio Oath Keeper Vulnerable in Jail

Watkins said she worries for her safety.

spectrumnews1.com

Thanks, Qnut