washamericom
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2010
- 13,703
- 1,908
- 245
- Banned
- #21
Republicans usually go after the under ten set.
tricky ticky ravi,... yeah you're pretty cool... it's these well thought out posts that make me a fan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans usually go after the under ten set.
It's all about political point scoring for some.
All I will say is that when choosing aides? These folks need to be a bit more careful in their choices and that goes for anyone.
I'd say the chances of any of these perverts doing their deeds in full view would be pretty small, no? You know how your employees 'like it?' Don't think so. Institutions or groups are getting tagged by those that hate those groups, by the actions of individuals that can't be known.
All one has to do is watch and listen.
I'd say the chances of any of these perverts doing their deeds in full view would be pretty small, no? You know how your employees 'like it?' Don't think so. Institutions or groups are getting tagged by those that hate those groups, by the actions of individuals that can't be known.
All one has to do is watch and listen.
That's bullshit, T. These people get away with their actions for decades sometimes, and no one suspects them. If you think you can spot a pedophile just by 'watching' and 'listening' then you are pretty damned naive.
It's all about political point scoring for some.
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
Yep...the partisans can't see the partisanship on their side simply because they agree with it.It's all about political point scoring for some.
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
It's all about political point scoring for some.
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
It may, or may not, have been. Certainly Ravi's reply was. Personally, I think it shows more about the poster when they tar a whole political party with the brush of one or two within it. Do all Democrats not pay their taxes? No. Is it only Democrats? No. Are all Republicans racist? No. Are all racists Republicans? No. But none of these facts stop the partisans from claiming this shit as fact.
Yep...the partisans can't see the partisanship on their side simply because they agree with it.It's all about political point scoring for some.
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
It may, or may not, have been. Certainly Ravi's reply was. Personally, I think it shows more about the poster when they tar a whole political party with the brush of one or two within it. Do all Democrats not pay their taxes? No. Is it only Democrats? No. Are all Republicans racist? No. Are all racists Republicans? No. But none of these facts stop the partisans from claiming this shit as fact.
Indeed you got it. It's why the commentary followed the inflammatory title. So like how many that Ravi or Jillian have nothing to say about when it's not one of 'their's.' Notice how Art also jumped on, saying that shouldn't do and what I acknowledged about Democrats/Obama? When I threw in the other groups, crickets.
I've tried the 'taking the higher ground' route, it doesn't work unless all reasonable folks agree.
Yep...the partisans can't see the partisanship on their side simply because they agree with it.It's all about political point scoring for some.
exactly... which was her objection to the O/P, I believe... it was about political point scoring. )
Man...there is no way that any President before Obama has made such glaring poor choices as advisers...impossible.
And you should STFU. Got it ACE?All one has to do is watch and listen.
That's bullshit, T. These people get away with their actions for decades sometimes, and no one suspects them. If you think you can spot a pedophile just by 'watching' and 'listening' then you are pretty damned naive.
He should make a campaign commercial about his pedo-dar. Surely, voters can relate to that.
I'd say the chances of any of these perverts doing their deeds in full view would be pretty small, no? You know how your employees 'like it?' Don't think so. Institutions or groups are getting tagged by those that hate those groups, by the actions of individuals that can't be known.
All one has to do is watch and listen.
That's bullshit, T. These people get away with their actions for decades sometimes, and no one suspects them. If you think you can spot a pedophile just by 'watching' and 'listening' then you are pretty damned naive.