- May 20, 2009
- 144,299
- 66,656
- 2,330
Archaeology has been a passion of mine since grade school. It's a fascinating discipline but one that was terribly perverted for so many decades. It the egotistical drive to make people believe that WE are the most advanced, most amazing, smartest group to ever walk the planet "archaeology" has made a sham of itself.
However, with the Internet and smart phones and humble people asking question, we are at a tipping point where the overwhelming evidence of prior, far more advanced civilization is an absolute certainty.
The discovery of Gobekli Tepi has completely destroyed the convention, fictional narrative about civilization originating from the Tigris Euphrates 5,000 years ago. The City was built - and then buried - by an advanced civilization 11,000 years ago. Incontrovertible evidence, no reasonable doubt at all about its age.
This is thousands of years prior to our Bronze Age or Iron Age
Now, let's move over to another site that predates our notion of civilization: Giza plateau. This was supposed built by "Egyptians" a few thousand years ago using primitive tools, deer antlers and slave labor. If so, how do you explain this:
That's a block of granite, harder than steel on the Mohs scale. Yet someone core drilled it! Deer antler? Stone tools? Other?
Here's another site: Puma Pukku.
WikiGotItAllWrongapedia tells us "Pumapunku or Puma Punku (Aymara and Quechua which literally means 'Gate of the Puma') is a 6th-century T-shaped and strategically aligned man-made terraced platform mound with a sunken court and monumental structure on top that is part of the Pumapunku complex, at the Tiwanaku Site near Tiwanacu, in western Bolivia."
These stones are andesite, that's a solid 7 on the Mohs scale, harder than steel! What imaginary 6th Century technology existed to make precision cuts in andesite?
Deer antler? Stone tools? Other?
However, with the Internet and smart phones and humble people asking question, we are at a tipping point where the overwhelming evidence of prior, far more advanced civilization is an absolute certainty.
The discovery of Gobekli Tepi has completely destroyed the convention, fictional narrative about civilization originating from the Tigris Euphrates 5,000 years ago. The City was built - and then buried - by an advanced civilization 11,000 years ago. Incontrovertible evidence, no reasonable doubt at all about its age.
This is thousands of years prior to our Bronze Age or Iron Age
Now, let's move over to another site that predates our notion of civilization: Giza plateau. This was supposed built by "Egyptians" a few thousand years ago using primitive tools, deer antlers and slave labor. If so, how do you explain this:
That's a block of granite, harder than steel on the Mohs scale. Yet someone core drilled it! Deer antler? Stone tools? Other?
Here's another site: Puma Pukku.
WikiGotItAllWrongapedia tells us "Pumapunku or Puma Punku (Aymara and Quechua which literally means 'Gate of the Puma') is a 6th-century T-shaped and strategically aligned man-made terraced platform mound with a sunken court and monumental structure on top that is part of the Pumapunku complex, at the Tiwanaku Site near Tiwanacu, in western Bolivia."
These stones are andesite, that's a solid 7 on the Mohs scale, harder than steel! What imaginary 6th Century technology existed to make precision cuts in andesite?
Deer antler? Stone tools? Other?
