Every time Craig debates a physicist, he gets slaughtered.Typical nonsense thread opened by the OP.
Opening post is a wall of text that is little more than a paraphrased William Lane Craig speech. When you press the religious extremist to defend any of the tired, worn slogans, he disappears.
Its because his entire premise is based on what he THINKS the physics imply, and don't, and he's been corrected to the point of being tongue tied dozens and dozens of times.
There's a reason for that, and in the same way that cultists dont see, are dissonant, dont understand or else outright lie that the President is a serial-liar...cult worship is a brain function for many.
For many, the brain is a tool thats unique in that it can supercede some of its evolutionary inheritence. We are pack animals, which explains cults ~ but we also have the ability to contemplate...which explains how some are not susceptible.
Some can use it well, others dont.
When we say "we dont know" what created the Universe, if it was created at all...what was before the big bang, etc...
Most scientists agree. We dont know.
Others posit theories, but they're only hypothesis' at this point and not solidified, scientific theory.
So when these non physicists feel free to proclaim to KNOW.....point to cherry picked physicists who have said x, y, z ~ usually taken out of context and usually mis-understood, but we dont even NEED that to belabor this point...
They are wearing their lack of discernment right on their sleeves. They are proving they are not disciplined in their seeking of knowledge.
WE DONT KNOW, is the correct answer for origins, pre big bang, pre everything...- and that is science backed. There is no consensus. What would cause someone to overlook that fact and pretend, not being a physicist themselves...not on a chaulkboard with equations themselves...
pretend it is known?
Ignorance is what causes that.
And cultish thinking, as well.
Dont take my word for it, watch Craig debate any actual physicist and prove it.
Last edited: