jillian
Princess
Medical malpractice insurance is expensive because when doctors screw up the damage they cause is huge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think this doctor should be shielded from liability for giving patients HIV and Hepatitis C?
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local...ctor_reused_syringes_while_injecting_p-1.html
By the by, I'm also informed that he had a malpractice settlement in the area of a million dollars because he paralyzed someone while giving them an epidural.
If it were someone in your family, G-d forbid, and the cost of caring for them for the rest of their lives was a result of the doctor's negligence, would you want to see damages limited to $250,000?
Idiocy. I do wish you'd actually raise a point now and then. Go on... I'm rooting for you.
Idiocy. I do wish you'd actually raise a point now and then.
Oh, his post was about as idiotic as one I read on this board not too long ago wherein the poster claimed that embryonic stem cell research was the only research that produced results but yet was unaware that the biggest problem researchers have encountered with ESCR is the formation of cancers and tumors. Could ScreamingEagle's post possibly top that blooper?
It is the only research that's produced results so far. Adult stem cells can't do the same thing.
BTW, it's a lie that ESCR causes cancers and tumors.
If embryonic stem cells weren't tumorous, they wouldn't be growing into the body parts they're supposed to end up being. I actually checked that out.
ESCR isn't so much a function of what's been produced yet. It's about the possibilities.
…when you assert something causes cancer, i'd suggest it's up to you to provide CREDIBLE proof of that, not for me to disprove.