Critics Decry "Whitewashed" UN Report on Gaza Flotilla

[JStone]

The Panel finds:[/]

Puta, read and learn...

New York Times...

A long-awaited United Nations review of Israel’s 2010 raid on a Turkish-based flotilla in which nine passengers were killed has found that Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza is both legal and appropriate.

The report, expected to be released Friday, also found that when Israeli commandos boarded the main ship, they faced “organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers” and were therefore required to use force for their own protection
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/world/middleeast/02flotilla.html?pagewanted=all

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Panel finds:[/]

Puta, read and learn...

New York Times...

A long-awaited United Nations review of Israel’s 2010 raid on a Turkish-based flotilla in which nine passengers were killed has found that Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza is both legal and appropriate.

The report, expected to be released Friday, also found that when Israeli commandos boarded the main ship, they faced “organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers” and were therefore required to use force for their own protection
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/world/middleeast/02flotilla.html?pagewanted=all

Only in Zioland do attackers have the right to defend themselves.

 

[Jos]

I would rather read the "Actual" report (link above) than the opinion piece in the jewyork times

 

[JStone]

I would rather read the "Actual" report (link above) than the opinion piece in the jewyork times

OWNED, as usual, Puta. Now, return to blowing the touristas in bankrupt spain during your 18 hour siesta.

New York Times...

A long-awaited United Nations review of Israel’s 2010 raid on a Turkish-based flotilla in which nine passengers were killed has found that Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza is both legal and appropriate.

The report, expected to be released Friday, also found that when Israeli commandos boarded the main ship, they faced “organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers” and were therefore required to use force for their own protection
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/world/middleeast/02flotilla.html?pagewanted=all

 

[JStone]

The Panel finds:[/]

Puta, read and learn...

New York Times...

A long-awaited United Nations review of Israel’s 2010 raid on a Turkish-based flotilla in which nine passengers were killed has found that Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza is both legal and appropriate.

The report, expected to be released Friday, also found that when Israeli commandos boarded the main ship, they faced “organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers” and were therefore required to use force for their own protection
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/world/middleeast/02flotilla.html?pagewanted=all

Only in Zioland do attackers have the right to defend themselves.

International law, birdbrain.

 

[JStone]

Time Magazine: Globally Isolated and Economically Crippled: Why Hamas is Losing Gaza

Besieged by Israel and the West, which regards it as a terrorist group, and cut off from the Palestinian majority in the West Bank, Hamas has little to offer beyond its jihadist credentials — and the promise of clean government. So it's hardly surprising that the party has been rapidly losing ground in its stronghold. Recent surveys by leading pollsters conclude that if elections were held in Gaza today, Hamas, an acronym in Arabic for the Islamic Resistance Movement, would not be returned to power. A June poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that Hamas would get just 28% of the vote, a steep decline from the 44% plurality it won in 2006.

Especially alarming for the Islamists is a precipitous drop in support for the party among Gaza's youth: two-thirds of the population is under 25. In a March survey taken in the afterglow of the protests in Cairo's Tahrir Square that led to the ouster of Egypt's dictator, Hosni Mubarak, more than 60% of Gazans age 18 to 27 said they too would support public demonstrations demanding regime change.

Soon after that poll, 10,000 turned out at a rally to voice a more modest demand — that Hamas end the bloody rift with Fatah, the secular party it bested six years ago. Hamas sent thugs to break up the demonstration. "We came out to say the people should be united, and they attack us!" says Shadi Hassan, 22, who lives in a refugee camp and sells cigarettes. "We are suffocated, and we need regime change."

Even party stalwarts agree that they've lost the street. "The majority of people want a change, yes," says Ahmed Yusuf, a former deputy foreign minister for Hamas who now runs a think tank called House of Wisdom. "They are not happy with the way Hamas is governing Gaza. Wherever you look is miserable life." Forty percent of Gazans live in poverty. The rate of unemployment is approaching 50%, among the highest in the world, and is likely to worsen as the population of 1.6 million doubles in the next 20 years. "Because they believe in God, they don't think a lot about the future," says Gaza economist Omar Shaban, who heads the Pal-Think think tank. "You won't find someone in Hamas who is thinking about 2045. They say, 'Oh, God will provide.'"

Globally Isolated and Economically Crippled: Why Hamas is Losing Gaza - TIME

 

[P F Tinmore]

Puta, read and learn...

New York Times...

Only in Zioland do attackers have the right to defend themselves.

International law, birdbrain.

What law would that be?

 

[JStone]

Only in Zioland do attackers have the right to defend themselves.

International law, birdbrain.

What law would that be?

The same law of armed conflict that permitted the US and Britain to blockade Germany during WW II, dummy. The same law that permitted the US to blockade Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis which the US has blockaded for the past 50+ years.

Now, even you know, ignorant bedouin

 

[P F Tinmore]

International law, birdbrain.

What law would that be?

The same law of armed conflict that permitted the US and Britain to blockade Germany during WW II, dummy. The same law that permitted the US to blockade Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis which the US has blockaded for the past 50+ years.

Now, even you know, ignorant bedouin

It has been a while since I read that but blockades only applied to military and commercial ships not ships that are religious, medical, or philanthropic.

 

[JStone]

I would rather read the "Actual" report (link above) than the opinion piece in the jewyork times

Puta Hos, your own link states the Israeli blockade is lawful. Maybe, learn basic reading comprehension skills, puta Hos?

The Panel finds: The fundamental principle of the freedom of navigation on the high seas is
subject to only certain limited exceptions under international law. Israel faces
a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade
was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons
from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the
requirements of international law.

Puta Hos is OWNED!

 

[rhodescholar]

I would rather read the "Actual" report (link above) than the opinion piece in the jewyork times

Thanks for sharing racist animal asshole.

 

[rhodescholar]

It has been a while since I read that but blockades only applied to military and commercial ships not ships that are religious, medical, or philanthropic.

You can read, fuckbrain? Who knew?

 

[JStone]

I would rather read the "Actual" report (link above) than the opinion piece in the jewyork times

Thanks for sharing racist animal asshole.

Puta Hos is bitter over the great success of Israel and the dismal failure of bankrupt backward spain.

While the spics take 18 hour siestas, the Jews are discovering cures for diseases and inventing next-generation computer microprocessors.

 

[JStone]

It has been a while since I read that but blockades only applied to military and commercial ships not ships that are religious, medical, or philanthropic.

You can read, fuckbrain? Who knew?

Sure, even ignorant bedouins like Tinhead can read Quran.

 

[Jos]

I hope this "Law" will be used equally on israel

 

[JStone]

Official UN Palmer Commisison Report

The Panel finds:
ii. The fundamental principle of the freedom of navigation on the high seas is subject to only certain limited exceptions under international law. Israel faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade
was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the requirements of international law.

iv. Although people are entitled to express their political views, the flotilla acted
recklessly in attempting to breach the naval blockade. The majority of the flotilla participants had no violent intentions, but there exist serious questions about the conduct, true nature and objectives of the flotilla organizers, particularly IHH. The actions of the flotilla needlessly carried the potential for escalation.

vii. Israeli Defense Forces personnel faced significant, organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers when they boarded the Mavi Marmara requiring them to use force for their own protection. Three soldiers were captured, mistreated, and placed at risk by those passengers. Several others were wounded.

http://www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/mi...nel_Report.pdf

 

[P F Tinmore]

So we don't forget the basis for this thread.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlLm1Ym3Pbc]As Turkey Freezes Israel Ties, Critics Decry "Whitewashed" UN Report on Gaza Flotilla 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwRHJBAr0q8&feature=relmfu]As Turkey Freezes Israel Ties, Critics Decry "Whitewashed" UN Report on Gaza Flotilla 2 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[JStone]

UN Palmer Commission Report

The Panel finds:
ii. The fundamental principle of the freedom of navigation on the high seas is subject to only certain limited exceptions under international law. Israel faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade
was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the requirements of international law.

iv. Although people are entitled to express their political views, the flotilla acted
recklessly in attempting to breach the naval blockade. The majority of the flotilla participants had no violent intentions, but there exist serious questions about the conduct, true nature and objectives of the flotilla organizers, particularly IHH. The actions of the flotilla needlessly carried the potential for escalation.

vii. Israeli Defense Forces personnel faced significant, organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers when they boarded the Mavi Marmara requiring them to use force for their own protection. Three soldiers were captured, mistreated, and placed at risk by those passengers. Several others were wounded.

http://www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/middle_east/Gaza_Flotilla_Panel_Report.pdf

 

[P F Tinmore]

UN Palmer Commission Report

The Panel finds:
ii. The fundamental principle of the freedom of navigation on the high seas is subject to only certain limited exceptions under international law. Israel faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade
was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the requirements of international law.

iv. Although people are entitled to express their political views, the flotilla acted
recklessly in attempting to breach the naval blockade. The majority of the flotilla participants had no violent intentions, but there exist serious questions about the conduct, true nature and objectives of the flotilla organizers, particularly IHH. The actions of the flotilla needlessly carried the potential for escalation.

vii. Israeli Defense Forces personnel faced significant, organized and violent resistance from a group of passengers when they boarded the Mavi Marmara requiring them to use force for their own protection. Three soldiers were captured, mistreated, and placed at risk by those passengers. Several others were wounded.

http://www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/middle_east/Gaza_Flotilla_Panel_Report.pdf

Only in Zioland do the attackers have the right to defend themselves.

 

[JStone]

"The Misery of Arabs/Apple R&D In Israel"

Apple will open a research and development center in Israel that will focus on semiconductors

The R&D center in Herzliya, Israel’s version of Silicon Valley, would be Apple’s first outside California

Earlier this week, Israeli media reported Apple was in advanced talks to buy Anobit, an Israeli maker of flash storage technology, for $400-$500 million

It is so sad and frustrating to see APPLE investing in Israel, while we as Arabs are not able to attract these investments to our countries! I don’t know what our leaders are doing to create proper environment for such investments!

I would prefer seeing APPLE as well as MICROSOFT having their R&D in Lebanon or any other Arab Country instead of being in ISRAEL!

WISH THE ARAB LEADERS WILL WAKE UP AND CARE FOR DEVELOPING THEIR COUNTRIES AND SOCIETIES INSTEAD OF APPLYING DICTATORSHIP AND KILL THEIR PEOPLE!

The Misery of Arabs ! Apple R&D in ISRAEL! | What do You Think ?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA4wnqRAuhI]Apple to set up Israel development center - YouTube[/ame]