caddis
Old Chum
I resemble that remarkI wondered why it smelled like fish this morning
Its not just caddis.
When we tried to settle some immigration issues in Kalifornia, the courts shut it down.editec, you (and my suspicion is WRONG)
From the 2008 Repulican Platform:
The rule of law means
1. guaranteeing to law enforcement the tools and coordination to deport criminal aliens without delay – and correcting court decisions that have made deportation so difficult.
2. Enforcing the law against those who overstay their visas, rather than letting millions flout the generosity that gave them temporary entry.
3. Imposing maximum penalties on those who smuggle illegal aliens into the U.S., both for their lawbreaking and for their cruel exploitation.
4. requiring cooperation among federal, state and local law enforcement and real consequences, including the denial of federal funds, for self-described sanctuary cities, which stand in open defiance of the federal and state statutes that expressly prohibit such sanctuary policies, and which endanger the lives of U.S. citizens.
It does not mean driver's licenses for illegal aliens, nor does it mean that states should be allowed to flout the federal law barring them from giving in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens, nor does it mean that illegal aliens should receive social security benefits, or other public benefits, except as provided by federal law.
We oppose amnesty. The rule of law suffers if government policies encourage or reward illegal activity. The American people's rejection of en masse legalizations is especially appropriate given the federal government's past failures to enforce the law.
Our schools have no problem rating and punishing us based on race (test score sub-groups) yet we can's ask a family to prove they are here legally before we spend thousands of dollars we don't have to educate them.
Last edited: