Congressional Subpoena Power

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by dilloduck, Apr 10, 2005.

  1. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,550
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,407
    Where exactly do they derive it from and who is in charge of enforcing their subpoena? Are we looking at a gap that the constitution doesn't cover?
     
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,848
    Thanks Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,789
    Series of court cases and reviews:

    http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/sine.htm

     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,550
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,407

    Thanks--seems like basically the courts gave congress some power originally delegated to them by the constitution.
    Interesting--Is the Attorney General the enforcer of this subpoena or the congressional Sgt. at Arms maybe?
     
  4. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,747
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,404
    Excellent question. The answer is that the Dept. of Justice -- i.e., the executive branch -- would enforce the subpoena. If a Congressional subpoena were ignored, Congress would sponsor a resolution or ad hoc piece of legislation empowering the DOJ or the U.S. Attorney to go get 'em. This information, I got by calling the House Government Reform Committee.

    But you're right --- subpoena power is generally a mix of judicial and executive power. The judge signs the subpoena, and if it's ignored, sends the sheriff to go drag you out of bed. Legislative bodies like Congress are mostly "dead" branches, i.e., they don't have guys with guns. They just have rule-making power. The founders liked the idea of separating these roles, and Congressional subpoenas do create Constitutional fuzzy areas.

    All of which is made even stupider when Congress subpoenas baseball players.
     
  5. USViking
    Offline

    USViking VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,452
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC USA
    Ratings:
    +69
    During the Senate Watergate hearings the White House said it might have presidential legal counsellor John Dean refuse to obey a Senate subpoena,
    and the chairman of the commitee said the Sergeant at Arms would in that case be sent to White House to arrest Mr. Dean.

    A serious constitutional crisis would have ensued. Fortunately the administration gave in, although Dean's testimony may not have been entirely forthcoming.
     
  6. Houston Allred
    Offline

    Houston Allred Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    William Joyce attempts to answer the question "Who acts for Congress when a Congressional subpoena is issued?" with "The answer is that the Dept. of Justice -- i.e., the executive branch -- would enforce the subpoena. If a Congressional subpoena were ignored, Congress would sponsor a resolution or ad hoc piece of legislation empowering the DOJ or the U.S. Attorney to go get 'em. This information, I got by calling the House Government Reform Committee." What about the U.S. House of Representatives Sergeant-at-arms? Who on the House Government Reform Committee gave Joyce that info?
     
  7. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,747
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,404
    The dude who answered the phone.

    I also have an aged e-mail from my Con Law prof saying basically the same thing.

    I would LOVE, LOVE, LOVE to have a client walk in and want to challenge a Congressional subpoena. I'd take that bee-hotch to the Supreme Court. But, I do insurance defense, so, fat chance!
     
  8. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,347
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,327
    What a current topic!
     
  9. LAfrique
    Offline

    LAfrique VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,416
    Thanks Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +70

    When it comes to those thugs in Washington DC, they will not hesitate to create some national military czar to execute whatever they assume needed in the name of homeland security.
     
  10. Sherry
    Offline

    Sherry You're not the boss of me Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    21,707
    Thanks Received:
    8,948
    Trophy Points:
    960
    Location:
    some beach
    Ratings:
    +11,394
    Hey, I miss dillo.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
congress subpeona power who has
,
congress subphoena power vs juficial dubphoena powrr
,

congress subpoena power

,
does congress have subpoena power
,
does senate homeland security committee have subpoena power
,
mcgrain v daugherty inherent power
,
power of congress to subpoena
,
rules for congressional subphoena
,
senate subpoena power
,
senate supeana power
,
subpoena power in congress
,
us congress subpoena power