"Common Sense" Gun Control

[Quantum Windbag]

I don't need to read Heller, SCOTUS needs to read the Constitution where it says "shall not be infringed."

That's right, any time, any place. No permits, no background checks, no restrictions whatsoever. The second amendment is very clear "the right to keep and bear arms shall no be infringed" That means no one can take any gun from any person under any circumstance.

So if SCOTUS cannot interpret law...is there law ?

When SCOTUS read the 14th Amendment, which clearly says "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," and said it doesn't apply to the states, was the almighty law right?

 

[Oldguy]

I don't need to read Heller, SCOTUS needs to read the Constitution where it says "shall not be infringed."

So you just throw out / ignore the order of law and the SCOTUS ?

How is pointing out that the court is flat out wrong throwing out anything?

Wrong or not, their decision IS final and if you're going to be a member of a free society based upon the rule of law, you have no alternative but to submit to their decision. It is the law of the land until it is changed.... and the law outweighs your personal opinion.

Claiming the right to ignore it and do whatever the hell you like is nothing less than thumbing your nose at the Constitution and is, in fact, un-American.

 

[Doc91678]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn7bkncf1_E&feature=youtu.be"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn7bkncf1_E&feature=youtu.be[/ame]​

 

[Quantum Windbag]

So you just throw out / ignore the order of law and the SCOTUS ?

How is pointing out that the court is flat out wrong throwing out anything?

Wrong or not, their decision IS final and if you're going to be a member of a free society based upon the rule of law, you have no alternative but to submit to their decision. It is the law of the land until it is changed.... and the law outweighs your personal opinion.

Claiming the right to ignore it and do whatever the hell you like is nothing less than thumbing your nose at the Constitution and is, in fact, un-American.

No decision is final, if they were we would still have Jim Crow laws. Not that I expect an idiot to understand that the court can be wrong, and admit it.

 

[Oldguy]

How is pointing out that the court is flat out wrong throwing out anything?

Wrong or not, their decision IS final and if you're going to be a member of a free society based upon the rule of law, you have no alternative but to submit to their decision. It is the law of the land until it is changed.... and the law outweighs your personal opinion.

Claiming the right to ignore it and do whatever the hell you like is nothing less than thumbing your nose at the Constitution and is, in fact, un-American.

No decision is final, if they were we would still have Jim Crow laws. Not that I expect an idiot to understand that the court can be wrong, and admit it.

Of course the Court can be wrong and, yes, decisions can ultimately be changed, but that's not the point is it?

So what if you think the Court is wrong? What do you think you can do about it? Resist the law? Ignore the law just because you don't like it? Remember what's happened to all those other simpletons who've done things like refuse to pay their taxes because they think the Court was "wrong?"

Where are they now?

 

[M14 Shooter]

So you just throw out / ignore the order of law and the SCOTUS ?

How is pointing out that the court is flat out wrong throwing out anything?

Wrong or not, their decision IS final....

Make sure you point this out to those who disagree with or simply ignore Heller, etc.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Wrong or not, their decision IS final and if you're going to be a member of a free society based upon the rule of law, you have no alternative but to submit to their decision. It is the law of the land until it is changed.... and the law outweighs your personal opinion.

Claiming the right to ignore it and do whatever the hell you like is nothing less than thumbing your nose at the Constitution and is, in fact, un-American.

No decision is final, if they were we would still have Jim Crow laws. Not that I expect an idiot to understand that the court can be wrong, and admit it.

Of course the Court can be wrong and, yes, decisions can ultimately be changed, but that's not the point is it?

So what if you think the Court is wrong? What do you think you can do about it? Resist the law? Ignore the law just because you don't like it? Remember what's happened to all those other simpletons who've done things like refuse to pay their taxes because they think the Court was "wrong?"

Where are they now?

That is exactly the point, you are saying the decisions are final and settled, yet decisions are, occasionally, reversed, and they are often challenged by smart people. What makes the laws work in this country is the very fact that any interpretation the Court hands down can be challenged.