HaShev
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,782
- 7,092
- 335
CNN and other tabloid news networks in using the Corker narrative on possible nuclear war, are inadvertently raising
the question of who kicked the can down the road doing deals, so N.Korea could have nukes.
In other words, not having the gonads to do what needed to be done while the risk is at it's least amount, and instead let a future generarion deal with the even far greater risk and tension.
Surely diplomacy has been forefront in this administration, and Dems themself acknowledge N. Korea's threat and posteur being the problem, therefore switching sides on blame is as deflection of the actual culprits, those who made fake deals without policing them and which outcome was the mess we see today.
Trump did more in involving China then previous presidents who left this on our lap.
Furthermore if it's gonna happen you want it before they have the capabilities, not after -duh!
Lastly, the assumptions on why the negotiator says the things he says in the form of media he uses is to be totally ignorant of how negotiations work.
Sometimes playing good cop-bad cop making the Secretary of State like the car salesman wanting to give you the deal, but his boss is against it=all part of the art of the deal.
Therefore the media & their negative twist narratives are theguilty party in squashing diplomacy and starting greater tensions, the kind as they say
start a nuclear WWIII.
the question of who kicked the can down the road doing deals, so N.Korea could have nukes.
In other words, not having the gonads to do what needed to be done while the risk is at it's least amount, and instead let a future generarion deal with the even far greater risk and tension.
Surely diplomacy has been forefront in this administration, and Dems themself acknowledge N. Korea's threat and posteur being the problem, therefore switching sides on blame is as deflection of the actual culprits, those who made fake deals without policing them and which outcome was the mess we see today.
Trump did more in involving China then previous presidents who left this on our lap.
Furthermore if it's gonna happen you want it before they have the capabilities, not after -duh!
Lastly, the assumptions on why the negotiator says the things he says in the form of media he uses is to be totally ignorant of how negotiations work.
Sometimes playing good cop-bad cop making the Secretary of State like the car salesman wanting to give you the deal, but his boss is against it=all part of the art of the deal.
Therefore the media & their negative twist narratives are theguilty party in squashing diplomacy and starting greater tensions, the kind as they say
start a nuclear WWIII.