Synthaholic
Diamond Member
I can’t wait for him to choke on a chicken bone, or finally succumb to his diabetes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thomas who probably harass Anita Hill, that Thomas, and made his confirmation about attacking a black man? That Thomas?
Thomas's second wife remained active in conservative politics, serving as a consultant to the Heritage Foundation, and as founder and president of Liberty Central.[204] In 2011, she stepped down from Liberty Central to open a conservative lobbying firm, touting her "experience and connections", meeting with newly elected Republican congressmen and describing herself as an "ambassador to the tea party".[205][206] Also in 2011, 74 Democratic members of the House of Representatives wrote that Thomas should recuse himself on cases regarding the Affordable Care Act, due to "appearance of a conflict of interest" based on the work of his wife.[207]
--------------------------------------
he needs to step down and he should of in 2011. He is bias and had numerous conflicts of interest.
I don't want to be unnecessarily harsh so let me ask first, is English your second or third language?
Justice Thomas' wife remained active in conservative politics.
So what? What difference does that make? Should the spouse of any official resign from life?
No its my first language. Thomas's second wife was a lobbyist and involved in bias non profits, he should of recused himself, and probably never confirmed, same as Kavanaugh.
Try to get your ....mind....and I use the term loosely.....around this.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a paid apparatchik for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Was she a lobbyist as well. we all know they go to the bench with different thoughts on the constitution, but not when your partner belongs to a lobbying group and bias non profit.
What a champion of civil rights she is:
In the words of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice and co-founder of the Women's Rights Project at the ACLU, "Women's rights are an essential part of the overall human rights agenda, trained on the equal dignity and ability to live in freedom all people should enjoy."
also Mitch McConnell or his wife must resign. I'm deadly serious.
and tramp should kick his dtr and sil to the curb.
I can’t wait for him to choke on a chicken bone, or finally succumb to his diabetes.
Thomas should die and go to hell and once there meet McConnell and Trump…with the US Constitution.
1.CNN regular Jeffrey Toobin describes Justice Thomas, succinctly:
“In several of the most important areas of constitutional law, Thomas has emerged as an intellectual leader of the Supreme Court. Since the arrival of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., in 2005, and Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., in 2006, the Court has moved to the right when it comes to the free-speech rights of corporations, the rights of gun owners, and, potentially, the powers of the federal government; in each of these areas, the majority has followed where Thomas has been leading for a decade or more. Rarely has a Supreme Court Justice enjoyed such broad or significant vindication.” http://blogs.the-american-interest....omas-and-the-amendment-of-doom/#ixzz1WXKBUI2I
And Partners
2. A perennial mistake that folks make is awarding an undeserved objectivity, trustworthiness and/or ability to make decisions for the entire public. Nowhere is this more evident that that awarded to politicians, economists, bureaucrats, weathermen…..and the Supreme Court Justices.
Nowhere in the Constitution, the ‘law of the land,’ is there a requirement to do any more than listen to the meanderings of nine unelected lawyers. The Congress, and the President, and, yes, any literate citizen, are all assumed to have the same ability to judge constitutionality.
Exhibiting the brilliance that the knowledgeable have recognized in Justice Thomas, he puts the Court, the Justices, and the Constitution in perspective.
3. “…Clarence Thomas’s eloquent summary of the core precept of his judicial philosophy: that stare decisis—the venerable doctrine that courts should respect precedent—deserves but a minor place in Supreme Court jurisprudence. [He] emphasizes that, in America’s system of government, the “Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties are the law.” That’s why justices and other governmental officers take an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States”—not to safeguard judicial precedents.
“That the Constitution outranks other sources of law is inherent in its nature,” he writes. The job of a Supreme Court justice, therefore, “is modest: We interpret and apply written law to the facts of particular cases.”
Justice Thomas’s Credo
4. Everything changed when Progressives took over law schools. They taught law students a) that there was no natural law, nor unalienable rights, and b) that the Constitution is altered by case law. This meant American lawyers interpreting the Constitution via caselaw rather than through studying the Constitution itself.
The fact that Progressive villains…if that is not redundant…. Roscoe Pound and Christopher Columbus Langdell were able to subsume the Founders’ ideas and replace them with their own is bad enough.
But the myriad of law school grads who swallowed the idea that the Constitution bows to judge’s opinions documents their gullibility and fatuousness.
It is important that everyone know who Pound and Langdell were, and what they did to US jurisprudence....and I can reveal that.....
....next
Look pc if I was really crazed I'd include you and all the other lying degenerate repubs here.. I didn't just those 3 posThomas should die and go to hell and once there meet McConnell and Trump…with the US Constitution.
1.CNN regular Jeffrey Toobin describes Justice Thomas, succinctly:
“In several of the most important areas of constitutional law, Thomas has emerged as an intellectual leader of the Supreme Court. Since the arrival of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., in 2005, and Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., in 2006, the Court has moved to the right when it comes to the free-speech rights of corporations, the rights of gun owners, and, potentially, the powers of the federal government; in each of these areas, the majority has followed where Thomas has been leading for a decade or more. Rarely has a Supreme Court Justice enjoyed such broad or significant vindication.” http://blogs.the-american-interest....omas-and-the-amendment-of-doom/#ixzz1WXKBUI2I
And Partners
2. A perennial mistake that folks make is awarding an undeserved objectivity, trustworthiness and/or ability to make decisions for the entire public. Nowhere is this more evident that that awarded to politicians, economists, bureaucrats, weathermen…..and the Supreme Court Justices.
Nowhere in the Constitution, the ‘law of the land,’ is there a requirement to do any more than listen to the meanderings of nine unelected lawyers. The Congress, and the President, and, yes, any literate citizen, are all assumed to have the same ability to judge constitutionality.
Exhibiting the brilliance that the knowledgeable have recognized in Justice Thomas, he puts the Court, the Justices, and the Constitution in perspective.
3. “…Clarence Thomas’s eloquent summary of the core precept of his judicial philosophy: that stare decisis—the venerable doctrine that courts should respect precedent—deserves but a minor place in Supreme Court jurisprudence. [He] emphasizes that, in America’s system of government, the “Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties are the law.” That’s why justices and other governmental officers take an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States”—not to safeguard judicial precedents.
“That the Constitution outranks other sources of law is inherent in its nature,” he writes. The job of a Supreme Court justice, therefore, “is modest: We interpret and apply written law to the facts of particular cases.”
Justice Thomas’s Credo
4. Everything changed when Progressives took over law schools. They taught law students a) that there was no natural law, nor unalienable rights, and b) that the Constitution is altered by case law. This meant American lawyers interpreting the Constitution via caselaw rather than through studying the Constitution itself.
The fact that Progressive villains…if that is not redundant…. Roscoe Pound and Christopher Columbus Langdell were able to subsume the Founders’ ideas and replace them with their own is bad enough.
But the myriad of law school grads who swallowed the idea that the Constitution bows to judge’s opinions documents their gullibility and fatuousness.
It is important that everyone know who Pound and Langdell were, and what they did to US jurisprudence....and I can reveal that.....
....next
Exactly the sort of mindset your predecessors, the Soviet Bolsheviks would write.....while they were slaughtering 100 million men, women and children.
One can only wonder at the sort of upbringing a sociopath like you had.
But......always amusing to find atheistic Democrats/Liberals mentioning Hell.
Try to keep your vituperation in order.