RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
You do not have to be a scientist to know they do not know enough to make the claims they make.
The "science" of climatology is infantile. Ohh it works absolutely great on observed events and by using previous years records to guess what may happen next year. But what it doesn't know is massive compared to what it does know. Anyone claiming they have made a working computer model of our climate that can predict with any accuracy the future out in years is lying, misguided or stupid. THAT is the facts. A scientist you do not have to be to know these things.
Ask anyone that has made a climate model that "predicts" the future to input data from 10 years ago and see if that model recreates what we KNOW happened then. 15 years ago, 20 years ago. If it can not recreate what we already know has happened WHY could it possibly predict what will happen in the future?
The "science" of climatology is infantile. Ohh it works absolutely great on observed events and by using previous years records to guess what may happen next year. But what it doesn't know is massive compared to what it does know. Anyone claiming they have made a working computer model of our climate that can predict with any accuracy the future out in years is lying, misguided or stupid. THAT is the facts. A scientist you do not have to be to know these things.
Ask anyone that has made a climate model that "predicts" the future to input data from 10 years ago and see if that model recreates what we KNOW happened then. 15 years ago, 20 years ago. If it can not recreate what we already know has happened WHY could it possibly predict what will happen in the future?