Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons

[bigrebnc1775]

Chuck Woolery gives anti gunners a headache.
[ame=http://youtu.be/evEg1VNfX3o]Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons - YouTube[/ame]

 

[del]

yeah, what chuck says goes

 

[Valerie]

Can I buy a Vowel?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

SWEET!!
I had no idea Chuck was so hardcore.

 

[nodoginnafight]

The game show guy?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

 

[nodoginnafight]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.

irrelevant, when a person is correct it does not matter

 

[tap4154]

The game show guy?

Hell, we have a local community agitator in the White House pretending to be Leader of the Free World, as he steals OUR freedoms one by one.

Chuck is a sharp guy.

Just too bad we can't put BHO on a game show, and Chuck in the White House...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The game show guy?

Hell, we have a local community agitator in the White House pretending to be Leader of the Free World, as he steals OUR freedoms one by one.

Chuck is a sharp guy.

Just too bad we can't put BHO on a game show, and Chuck in the White House...

Chuck seems to have a constitution footing to support his position.

 

[tap4154]

The game show guy?

Hell, we have a local community agitator in the White House pretending to be Leader of the Free World, as he steals OUR freedoms one by one.

Chuck is a sharp guy.

Just too bad we can't put BHO on a game show, and Chuck in the White House...

Chuck seems to have a constitution footing to support his position.

Yep, and "progressives" just hate it when folks use the Constitution as a basis for their positions.

"Progressives" just wish that pesky Constitution would get lost, along with the writings of our Founders.

Maybe start all over here, using their favorite book as the foundation of Neo-America:

 

[NoNukes]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.

And Bob Costas.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.

And Bob Costas.

They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.

 

[NoNukes]

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.

And Bob Costas.

They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.

Neither of the three?

 

[GuyPinestra]

Can I buy a Vowel?

Wrong game show...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.

And Bob Costas.

They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.

Neither of the three?

Depends on what you're talking about.

 

[GuyPinestra]

The game show guy?

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.

Not applicable if your agreement stems from understanding what is said.

Also, you'd have to be able to show that Mr. Woolery doesn't have any understanding of the 2nd Amendment. By his words in this clip I think that would be a fruitless attempt.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?

I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.

Not applicable if your agreement stems from understanding what is said.

Also, you'd have to be able to show that Mr. Woolery doesn't have any understanding of the 2nd Amendment. By his words in this clip I think that would be a fruitless attempt.

This ^^^^^^^^^^

 

[NoNukes]

They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.

Neither of the three?

Depends on what you're talking about.

That went right over your head.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Neither of the three?

Depends on what you're talking about.

That went right over your head.

Being anti gunners that they are they're dead wrong and should always remain silent.
Now if it's about something they have some kind of knowledge in they should be free to voice their opinion.