Chuck Woolery gives anti gunners a headache.
[ame=http://youtu.be/evEg1VNfX3o]Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://youtu.be/evEg1VNfX3o]Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons - YouTube[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The game show guy?
The game show guy?
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
The game show guy?
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.
The game show guy?
The game show guy?
Hell, we have a local community agitator in the White House pretending to be Leader of the Free World, as he steals OUR freedoms one by one.
Chuck is a sharp guy.
Just too bad we can't put BHO on a game show, and Chuck in the White House...
The game show guy?
Hell, we have a local community agitator in the White House pretending to be Leader of the Free World, as he steals OUR freedoms one by one.
Chuck is a sharp guy.
Just too bad we can't put BHO on a game show, and Chuck in the White House...
Chuck seems to have a constitution footing to support his position.
The game show guy?
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
The game show guy?
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.
And Bob Costas.
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.
And Bob Costas.
They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.
Can I buy a Vowel?
Depends on what you're talking about.Oh.like Sean Penn and George Clooney.
And Bob Costas.
They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.
Neither of the three?
The game show guy?
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.
And? when someone is right what does it matter what they do?
I. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (argument from authority) the fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field. Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for assenting to the conclusion is based on following the recommendation or advice of an improper authority.
Not applicable if your agreement stems from understanding what is said.
Also, you'd have to be able to show that Mr. Woolery doesn't have any understanding of the 2nd Amendment. By his words in this clip I think that would be a fruitless attempt.
Depends on what you're talking about.They must first be correct for their position to be relevant. neither are.
Neither of the three?
Depends on what you're talking about.Neither of the three?
That went right over your head.