Charlatans Of The Arctic… Laughing Stock Ice-Free-Arctic Predictions …Fake Science At Its Best

[Sunsettommy]

Another CO2 failure to empty the Arctic region.



No Tricks Zone

Charlatans Of The Arctic… Laughing Stock Ice-Free-Arctic Predictions …Fake Science At Its Best

By P Gosselin on 21. July 2018

EXCERPT:

"Brimstone and fire predictions of an ice-free Arctic made 10 years ago by leading scientists, politicians and media outlets are emerging today as preposterous.

Recently climate catastrophe non-believers have been pointing out that Arctic sea ice volume has been gaining over the past years and has not trended downward for some dozen years now."

LINK

 

[skookerasbil]

It took about 12 years but voters finally caught up with these frauds. These days, talk of the whole melting arctic thing get an enormous burst of laughter and a quick exit of the room by the climate nutters.

 

[Crick]

What does this say to you dimwit?

Note that the zero value on the vertical axis is NOT an anomaly value, but ZERO ICE.

 

[Billy_Bob]

What does this say to you dimwit?

Note that the zero value on the vertical axis is NOT an anomaly value, but ZERO ICE.

BWHAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You and Old Fraud are touting the same old lies and bull shit.... 15% sea ice levels mean exactly squat!

 

[Old Rocks]

Image 3 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Yes, the deniers are undeniably stupid. If you took them to the Arctic, they would claim it was all pretend. And when the affects of the lack of the sea ice at the poles start affecting their lives in a negative way, the first thing they will say is "Why didn't those dumb scientists tell us about this?". No cure for this kind of ignorance and stupidity.

 

[Crick]

What does this say to you dimwit?

Note that the zero value on the vertical axis is NOT an anomaly value, but ZERO ICE.

BWHAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You and Old Fraud are touting the same old lies and bull shit.... 15% sea ice levels mean exactly squat!

How do you interpret those data? That Arctic ice volume is increasing? Do you have some reason to believe that trend is going to turn around? What do you think will happen when temperatures continue to increase? C'mon, use that enormous education you claim to have and tell us what will turn those trends around.

Global temperatures are increasing, Arctic temperatures fastest of them all. There is a point at which ice completely thaws and a point at which none of it ever gets frozen. Your argument with 15% is a complete red herring. That makes YOU the charlatan

 

[skookerasbil]

Lol....the deniers are the st00pid ones but which guys post up the same graphs over and over ...every week for years.....that nobody in the world cares about except the Arctic obsessed?

 

[skookerasbil]

Perhaps the climate crusaders missed the only news on climate change that matters!!

New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate




Clearly, most people dont give a rat's ass about the Arctic ice despite all being aware of the daunting predictions and ghey graphs.

Yuk....yuk....

 

[Billy_Bob]

What does this say to you dimwit?

Note that the zero value on the vertical axis is NOT an anomaly value, but ZERO ICE.

BWHAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You and Old Fraud are touting the same old lies and bull shit.... 15% sea ice levels mean exactly squat!

How do you interpret those data? That Arctic ice volume is increasing? Do you have some reason to believe that trend is going to turn around? What do you think will happen when temperatures continue to increase? C'mon, use that enormous education you claim to have and tell us what will turn those trends around.

Global temperatures are increasing, Arctic temperatures fastest of them all. There is a point at which ice completely thaws and a point at which none of it ever gets frozen. Your argument with 15% is a complete red herring. That makes YOU the charlatan

Nope!!!

YOU GUYS KEEP RUNNING WITH THAT LIE... I will be glad to help you impale yourselves on that sharp object...

Tell me morons, how much has the 30% level reduced? I can tell you....NONE And its SUMMER!

 

[Old Rocks]

look at the ocean temps in the Arctic.

 

[Old Rocks]

Image 2 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Looks like an early opening for both the Northwest Passage and the Northeast Passage.

 

[Old Rocks]

Arctic News: The Methane Threat

A blog, but the data is sound.

 

[Old Rocks]

A very good article on what we know and don't know at present concerning CH4 emissions in the Arctic. A very critical gas in the most critical area of the warming.

Understanding High-Latitude Methane in a Warming Climate - Eos

 

[Sunsettommy]

Notice that Old Rocks and Cricks completely avoid the posted article about PREDICTION failures?

Not only that they seem to miss the obvious that it is no longer dropping lower anymore. PIOMAS (the lowest quality) shows that it has been stable for around 9 years now by area and 11 years by volume.

The decline has STOPPED for years now.

 

[Sunsettommy]

A very good article on what we know and don't know at present concerning CH4 emissions in the Arctic. A very critical gas in the most critical area of the warming.

Understanding High-Latitude Methane in a Warming Climate - Eos

Ha ha ha, another bogus whine about a hyper trace gas with a trace IR absorption window.

 

[Sunsettommy]

If you think Rocks and Crick are bad, go read the comments by a warmist dude on this very article, Sebastian who gets smashed over and over. It is a treat to see Kenneth used published science papers to beat him over the head with.

No Tricks Zone

 

[skookerasbil]

A very good article on what we know and don't know at present concerning CH4 emissions in the Arctic. A very critical gas in the most critical area of the warming.

Understanding High-Latitude Methane in a Warming Climate - Eos

Theory

 

[Old Rocks]

Notice that Old Rocks and Cricks completely avoid the posted article about PREDICTION failures?

Not only that they seem to miss the obvious that it is no longer dropping lower anymore. PIOMAS (the lowest quality) shows that it has been stable for around 9 years now by area and 11 years by volume.

The decline has STOPPED for years now.

You do realize that you are a liar.



I had actually expected PIJAMAS average thickness to be lower, because JAXA was relatively high at the end of June, while PIOMAS is still holding up somewhat. Remember, PIJAMAS is a crude average sea ice thickness measure, which you get by dividing PIOMAS volume with JAXA extent. So, if JAXA is relatively high, average thickness should go down.

 

[Old Rocks]

If you think Rocks and Crick are bad, go read the comments by a warmist dude on this very article, Sebastian who gets smashed over and over. It is a treat to see Kenneth used published science papers to beat him over the head with.

No Tricks Zone

What an absolutely stupid and ignorant ass you are. Methane is an extremely effective GHG, especially on decade scales.

 

[Sunsettommy]

If you think Rocks and Crick are bad, go read the comments by a warmist dude on this very article, Sebastian who gets smashed over and over. It is a treat to see Kenneth used published science papers to beat him over the head with.

No Tricks Zone

What an absolutely stupid and ignorant ass you are. Methane is an extremely effective GHG, especially on decade scales.

PROVE IT!

I have already posted the MODTRAN results showing how feeble it is, have already posted showing how little IR it absorbs.

I await to see what you dredge up.