CBS News Poll: 75% Of Americans Want Only A Natural Born Citizen To Be President

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Jul 11, 2013
19,272
4,368
280
CBS News conducted a poll asking if the Article II natural born Citizen requirement in the U.S. Constitution should be changed to allow non-natural born Citizens be President. A whopping 75% said NO it should not be changed.

But yet they (media) continue the charade of propping up non-natural born Citizen candidates as if there's no issue.


CBS News poll: Should U.S. Presidents be "Natural Born"? - CBS News

naturalborncitizenchart.jpg.cf.jpg

euler-logic-diagram-citizenship-supersets-and-subsets%2Bbirther%2Breport.jpg
 
Last edited:
CBS News conducted a poll asking if the Article II natural born Citizen requirement in the U.S. Constitution should be changed to allow non-natural born Citizens be President. A whopping 75% said NO it should not be changed.

But yet they (media) continue the charade of propping up non-natural born Citizen candidates as if there's no issue.


CBS News poll: Should U.S. Presidents be "Natural Born"? - CBS News

euler-logic-diagram-citizenship-supersets-and-subsets%2Bbirther%2Breport.jpg


The other 25% replied "No Comprenda' English".
 
Art II, Sec 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and beenfourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Amendment XIV, from Section 1: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Shut up, McGarrett. You are wrong again.
 
I'm disappointed that it is only 75%, I would have thought it would have been much higher more like 98%.
Just shows how many so called Americans do not believe in the Constitution.
 
A “natural born Citizen” is a subset of the super-sets of all U.S. Citizens and “born Citizens”. No person born with dual-Citizenship at birth is a “natural born Citizen”. Ted Cruz who was born in Canada and thus with Canadian citizenship, to a Cuban father and thus he inherited Cuban citizenship, and to a U.S. Citizen mother and thus inherited U.S. Citizenship; is a tri-Citizen at birth and is not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Marco Rubio was born in the USA and thus is a U.S. Citizen at Birth to two Cuban citizen parents and thus he inherited Cuban citizenship from both his parents; is a dual-Citizen at birth and is not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.
 
Steve, we all know you are wrong on this, as has been proven repeatedly numerous times on this Board.
 
Art II, Sec 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and beenfourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Amendment XIV, from Section 1: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Shut up, McGarrett. You are wrong again.
Actually I'm right and you are wrong. It's Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. The only time a Citizen could be president was at the time if the adoption of the Constitution.
 
Art II, Sec 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and beenfourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Amendment XIV, from Section 1: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Shut up, McGarrett. You are wrong again.
Actually I'm right and you are wrong. It's Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. The only time a Citizen could be president was at the time if the adoption of the Constitution.
Only in your head, steve. You have no SCOTUS or case law to support it. You have been proven wrong on Wong repeatedly. You can keep yammering all you want, and that will availeth you nothing.
 
My opinion? All Congressmen, Senators, SCOTUS, and the President should be natural-born. Born of a naturalized Mother and Father, on U.S. soil or its territories. We need Americans representing us born with sole allegiance to America devout of foreign influence.
 
CBS News conducted a poll asking if the Article II natural born Citizen requirement in the U.S. Constitution should be changed to allow non-natural born Citizens be President. A whopping 75% said NO it should not be changed.

Rather amusingly, do you know who used to agree with that 75%?

Cruzobama%20birth%20C_zpsgycp5iln.jpg
 
CBS News conducted a poll asking if the Article II natural born Citizen requirement in the U.S. Constitution should be changed to allow non-natural born Citizens be President. A whopping 75% said NO it should not be changed.

But yet they (media) continue the charade of propping up non-natural born Citizen candidates as if there's no issue.


CBS News poll: Should U.S. Presidents be "Natural Born"? - CBS News

naturalborncitizenchart.jpg.cf.jpg

euler-logic-diagram-citizenship-supersets-and-subsets%2Bbirther%2Breport.jpg
Wrong.
Again.
"All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time."

On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”
 
A “natural born Citizen” is a subset of the super-sets of all U.S. Citizens and “born Citizens”. No person born with dual-Citizenship at birth is a “natural born Citizen”. Ted Cruz who was born in Canada and thus with Canadian citizenship, to a Cuban father and thus he inherited Cuban citizenship, and to a U.S. Citizen mother and thus inherited U.S. Citizenship; is a tri-Citizen at birth and is not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Marco Rubio was born in the USA and thus is a U.S. Citizen at Birth to two Cuban citizen parents and thus he inherited Cuban citizenship from both his parents; is a dual-Citizen at birth and is not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.

A “natural born Citizen” is a subset of the super-sets of all U.S. Citizens and “born Citizens”. No person born with dual-Citizenship at birth is a “natural born Citizen”.


Why do you feel that? Did you imagine it says that in the Constitution?
 
CBS News conducted a poll asking if the Article II natural born Citizen requirement in the U.S. Constitution should be changed to allow non-natural born Citizens be President. A whopping 75% said NO it should not be changed.

But yet they (media) continue the charade of propping up non-natural born Citizen candidates as if there's no issue.

75% of Americans know what the definition of Natural Born citizen is.

You and Kerchner are part of the other 25%
 

Forum List

Back
Top