Ravi
Diamond Member
Sometimes you just have to laugh at them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously. I wonder how many priests or unmarried Catholic men use it.Who would have thunk...huh?
Sometimes you just have to laugh at them.
Great minds and all that.Seriously. I wonder how many priests or unmarried Catholic men use it.Who would have thunk...huh?
Im sure a good deal of them do... along with a lot of others drugs and ID therapies.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...holic-health-care-coverage-the-flip-side.html
Penile implants are embraced by Catholics as well.Sometimes you just have to laugh at them.
Viagra was originally tested for the disease I have, pulmonary hypertension, and I took it three times a day when I was in Vanderbilt Hospital last summer. Now I take a newer generation beefed up version of the same thing. IMO, the drug companies sold me and others with my illness out when they changed the direction of their marketing upon discovery that it will give a man a boner. That being said, I would ask why you are concerned about Catholic men taking Viagra and not concerned about the getting penile implants, or other methods of producing an erection.
With the marketing of an 'orgasm pill' possible and even probable the men, Catholic or oth erwise need to get cracking. No pun intended. After all with a pill like that, women will cease to need a man for anything but lawn care and home maintenance. But wait. Some of us have those bases covered anyway!
Orgasm Pill | 'Orgasm Pill' Found Effective in Trials, Could Be Available by 2000, Report Says - Los Angeles Times
Great minds and all that.Seriously. I wonder how many priests or unmarried Catholic men use it.
Im sure a good deal of them do... along with a lot of others drugs and ID therapies.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...holic-health-care-coverage-the-flip-side.html
Penile implants are embraced by Catholics as well.Sometimes you just have to laugh at them.
Viagra was originally tested for the disease I have, pulmonary hypertension, and I took it three times a day when I was in Vanderbilt Hospital last summer. Now I take a newer generation beefed up version of the same thing. IMO, the drug companies sold me and others with my illness out when they changed the direction of their marketing upon discovery that it will give a man a boner. That being said, I would ask why you are concerned about Catholic men taking Viagra and not concerned about the getting penile implants, or other methods of producing an erection.
With the marketing of an 'orgasm pill' possible and even probable the men, Catholic or oth erwise need to get cracking. No pun intended. After all with a pill like that, women will cease to need a man for anything but lawn care and home maintenance. But wait. Some of us have those bases covered anyway!
Orgasm Pill | 'Orgasm Pill' Found Effective in Trials, Could Be Available by 2000, Report Says - Los Angeles Times
I find it extremely hypocritical.
Sometimes you just have to laugh at them.
since the catholic church encourages its members to procreate, and viagra facilitates the means by which procreation is achieved, i have to reluctantly assume that the OP doesn't know the definition of hypocrisy.
sadness envelops me
since the catholic church encourages its members to procreate, and viagra facilitates the means by which procreation is achieved, i have to reluctantly assume that the OP doesn't know the definition of hypocrisy.
sadness envelops me
If the "man" in the sky didn't mean it to happen, how can the kafflicks approve of artificial "help".
god helps those that help themselves.
If the "man" in the sky didn't mean it to happen, how can the kafflicks approve of artificial "help".
god helps those that help themselves.
If the earth is only @ 6,000 yrs old, according to Christians, do you think the man in the sky would think that mankind would develop such "cheater" pills in that amt of time? Also, how do you know that the condition that the drug was developed to address wasn't willed by the guy mentioned above?