Carter: U.S.-North Korea war seems 'strong possibility'

Discussion in 'Asia' started by janeeng, Sep 6, 2003.

  1. janeeng
    Online

    janeeng Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    A good article! even mentions ALASKA NT!!!!!

    We face the strong possibility of another Korean war, with potentially devastating consequences, so the endangered multilateral talks in Beijing are of paramount importance. It is vital that some accommodation be reached between Pyongyang and Washington.

    North Korea is an isolated country, poverty stricken, paranoid, apparently self-sacrificial and amazingly persistent in international confrontations, as is now being demonstrated. It is a cultural and almost sacred commitment for its leaders not to back down, even in the face of international condemnation and the most severe political and economic pressure.

    A previous example of this stubbornness occurred in 1968, when North Korea captured the USS Pueblo, a Navy intelligence-gathering ship. Despite the best efforts of President Lyndon Johnson to marshal international support and to prevail with economic punishment and military threats, President Kim il Sung never deviated from his basic demands, which included an embarrassing public apology from the United States for ''spying'' on his country. After 11 months, President Johnson accepted all the demands, and the crew was released.

    Notwithstanding their abysmal economic failures and the resulting hardships of their people, North Korean leaders have never deviated from a commitment to military strength. They maintain a formidable army, with artillery and missiles able to wreak great destruction on Seoul and the northern portion of South Korea, regardless of how much punishment North Koreans might have to absorb during a U.S. attack or counterattack. The development of advanced rocketry and now a potential nuclear capability is further proof of their scientific resources.

    Avoided in 1994

    There was another crisis in 1994, when Kim il Sung expelled International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors and threatened to begin reprocessing 8,000 spent fuel rods from a nuclear power plant. The U.S. government refused to talk to North Korean leaders, and made plans for economic sanctions and a military attack. As the crisis escalated, The Carter Center was finally given reluctant permission from President Clinton for me to visit Pyongyang. A satisfactory agreement was concluded and later confirmed by both governments, with participation by South Korea, Japan and others. But neither side honored all the commitments.

    Worrisome actions

    The situation is rapidly deteriorating again. North Korea feels increasingly threatened by being branded an ''axis of evil'' member; deployment of anti-ballistic missiles in Alaska; Washington voices expressing military threats; interception of North Korean ships; ad hominem attacks on President Kim Jong Il; condemnation of previous efforts by President Clinton and South Korean leaders to resolve issues peacefully; and U.S. refusal to negotiate directly with North Korea. America's newly declared policies of pre-emptive war and first use of nuclear weapons also concern North Koreans.

    Even before these more recent threats, the North Koreans began a secret and illicit nuclear program. They have initiated a concerted effort to develop a nuclear arsenal, with the possible production of a half-dozen weapons by the end of 2003 and similar annual numbers thereafter. These could be used by North Korea or sold to other nations or terrorist groups. This is now by far the most serious threat to regional and world peace.

    There are other issues, but the basic North Korean demand is a firm non-aggression commitment from the United States, which U.S. officials continue to reject. The U.S. insists first on a complete end to the North Koreans' nuclear program, which they have refused to accept. If neither side will yield or compromise, then an eventual military confrontation seems likely. The United States can prevail, but with terrible human casualties in both North and South Korea.

    There must be verifiable assurances that prevent North Korea from becoming a threatening nuclear power, with a firm commitment that the U.S. will not attack a peaceful North Korea. This is a time for sustained and flexible diplomacy between our two governments, to give peace and economic progress a chance within a nuclear-free Korean peninsula.
     
  2. NightTrain
    Offline

    NightTrain VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,425
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Ratings:
    +87
    Yep, that's the bad news... we're screwed here in AK if push comes to shove, because the SDI site up at Fort Greeley is now a prime target. They'll lob a bunch of missiles at that site in order to try and overwhelm its' defenses.


    Nothin like a dozen nukes aimed at a point roughly 200 miles from your house!

    BUT.. I think that there are quite a few satellites & spy plane overflights of that country, and of course the CIA has spies there, and if it's detected that they're preparing to strike - BOOM!!

    We wouldn't sit idly by, we'd take them out first. Then the whole world's fate would hinge on what China will do about it. They've definitely got the capability to reach out and touch us.
     
  3. janeeng
    Online

    janeeng Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Let's sure hope so NT, that's a little too close for comfort!
     
  4. Dan
    Offline

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    3,928
    Thanks Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Aiken, SC
    Ratings:
    +157
    Nice of them to NOT mention the Savannah River Site, one of the largest producers of nuclear weapons in the southeast, and conveniently located literally three miles down the road from me! :eek:
     
  5. janeeng
    Online

    janeeng Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Dan, time for you to head to Rutgers! hahahahaha! hey, some good parties go on over there! :) I know, i will be in big trouble for telling you that! hehe! you are right though. I think a lot of the states have some sort of threat. NJ, well gee, Forked River has a nice nuclear plant, easy access too being Cheesy doesn't want to pay for more protection there.
     

Share This Page