A well built watch that goes too fast sometimes and at other times too slow? Hmmmmmmmm
Just like it is supposed to work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A well built watch that goes too fast sometimes and at other times too slow? Hmmmmmmmm
Not at all. Ever heard of boom and bust? What happened in 2008? What happened in 1929?
Study finds private prisons keep inmates longer, without reducing future crime
Furthermore, any suggestion that recidivism is restricted to prison experience, versus the other underlying causes that lead to crime (in any circumstance), would be an attempt to associate blame where it may not be due.
I am not saying that someone could not come to that conclusion if they choose to make that association, just that it is a poor association.
Mate, you are a fucking tool. What are these "government unions" you are on about. If you cant get basic facts right then I cant see how you can converse with adults. I would ask you for a link to back up your shit but really, I think you are just on a wind up mission.
Perhaps you have a link to these "government unions" ?
How many crimes do they commit during that additional time the criminal was behind bars?
[
Oh piss off. I'm not one of these lame fuckers on this board who couldn't string an argument together.
What I'm looking for is evidence that I could use in FORMULATING AN ARGUMENT and this article does NOT show me enough to be able to do so.
I'm sorry if you think one state in the US can show you all you need to know on a topic.
Point in case, your opinion of yourself is irrelevant to any argument you could make.
You asked for a study, and I provided you with one quickly (addressing the fact there are more), You didn't debate the ideas in the study, you debated the fact the study must be flawed because you didn't like what it studied, and it didn't represent your desired outcome.
You are correct, that you are not, "one of these lame fuckers on this board who couldn't string an argument together". Unfortunately you have mistaken your abilities to make an argument, with the idea it makes your argument worth anything.
I've struggled to find recidivism rates between states, especially involving Louisiana to compare. Do you have anything that shows this in detail?
How many crimes do they commit during that additional time the criminal was behind bars?
I'll disregard the fact you may be trying to make a point that doesn't address the fact that crimes occur behind bars.
Since your question specifically asks how many crimes the prisoners commit during additional time behind bars, that would be asking if the number of crimes committed behind bars was different between private and public prisons (since the difference is based on additional time or private prisons).
Whereas you cannot necessarily find a specific answer to that question, you can however find an answer as to the difference in crimes committed behind bars at public facilities versus private facilities and likewise assume that not only do the crimes occur more often behind private prison bars, they would in turn occur more often during additional time, that isn't even calculated in the time not spent behind bars in a public facility.
To answer your question (as best as it can be answered)...
Crimes committed behind bars in the private facilities during additional time, are 46% more often for violent incidents, and 65% more often for inmate on inmate assault, than if they had dome the same additional time in a public facility.
Private vs. Public Prisons: Differences & Statistics - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com
Nope. Maybe you have these in the US but the very concept is alien to the way we operate in the UK. There are unions that represent government workers but they are independent of the government.Perhaps you have a link to these "government unions" ?
You're being facetious,...aren't you?
Yep, no innocent civilians are victims. Thank you.
[
Oh piss off. I'm not one of these lame fuckers on this board who couldn't string an argument together.
What I'm looking for is evidence that I could use in FORMULATING AN ARGUMENT and this article does NOT show me enough to be able to do so.
I'm sorry if you think one state in the US can show you all you need to know on a topic.
Point in case, your opinion of yourself is irrelevant to any argument you could make.
You asked for a study, and I provided you with one quickly (addressing the fact there are more), You didn't debate the ideas in the study, you debated the fact the study must be flawed because you didn't like what it studied, and it didn't represent your desired outcome.
You are correct, that you are not, "one of these lame fuckers on this board who couldn't string an argument together". Unfortunately you have mistaken your abilities to make an argument, with the idea it makes your argument worth anything.
Actually what I asked for was
I've struggled to find recidivism rates between states, especially involving Louisiana to compare. Do you have anything that shows this in detail?
Then you show me a study without Louisiana, that doesn't compare recidivism rates between states, and then you accuse me of not liking this study because "it doesn't support your desired conclusion", which if you look at the original post, you'll see if complete rubbish.
As for "Unfortunately you have mistaken your abilities to make an argument, with the idea it makes your argument worth anything." what am I supposed to do with what you've posted?
I told you, I need certain facts before I can even try to make an argument, and I don't have these facts.
Better than trying to figure out what you've been smoking, for sure.
Same old fucking attacks.
Boring.
Nope. Maybe you have these in the US but the very concept is alien to the way we operate in the UK. There are unions that represent government workers but they are independent of the government.Perhaps you have a link to these "government unions" ?
You're being facetious,...aren't you?
Without tracking back I think that this clown was suggesting that the unions,egged on by the government ,conspired to bring down a private business.
You would have to be on crack to believe that could happen.
I am waiting for Mrs T to decide what to wear when we go out later so I will explain it to you.
Firstly we have a government that is right wing and totally wedded to privatisation. They sold off the railways and have a political interest in making it work.
Train privatisation has failed us: it’s time to do things differently
They would pretty much do anything to keep the trains in private hands. The alternative is to lose face and political capital.
The RMT are a reasonably militant union who are dealing with the out fall of privatisation. They oppose the governments position totally. The idea that they would work with the government is ludicrous. Their current beef with Southern is about safety. Southern want to cut costs by removing guards from the trains. The RMT oppose this on safety grounds and also for the purposes of protecting its members.
So the RMT are actually on a collision course with the government backed rail company and the government.
Southern is the worst performing railways in the UK.
Southern rail 'is worst train service'
It has a monopoly,government backing and the reasurance of a safety net if it screws up. It is a failure of capitalism.
And I still dont understand the concept of "government unions".