Rshermr
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #41
No, it's not good. It's a disgusting, and morally bankrupt system. There right about the abolishment of private property and the force of common ownership. There was nothing good that Marx inspired, but at least I understand it. And to be fair, Karl Marx tried to understand economic theories regarding Supply and Demand.
You, on the other hand, choose not to understand a thing while passing yourself off as knowledgeable.
Good for you, Amazon. An economics expert in your own mind. Next???
Socialism does not require, and generally does not entail, gov ownership other than of the means of production and distribution of goods and services. Which is why you are continually wrong. I linked you to proof of that. You seem to have no link proving your contention that socialism entails loss of private ownership. That would be, me girl, because you can not find a reasonable source that would back you up. Because, of course, you are simply lying.
Because you keep conflating socialism and communism. Really. A little honesty would be good.
then the delusional clown says:
What did engles and marx develop??? Not socialism. Socialism existed. They developed a particular very advanced form of socialism they named COMMUNISM. What they added, me dear, among other things, was the elimination of private property. As has been proven to you before. Here. Again: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The Communist ManifestoWho else knows better than the developers of the social science and the economic system You? That's a riot!
That would be from Washington State University. Still waiting for a link by you proving your completely ridiculous statement that socialism, in the non communist form, requires the elimination of private property. Which you will not provide. Because you can not find such a link. Except among the bat shit crazy con sites, which you do not want to admit is your source of the drivel you post.
Why you want to push this stupid idea that socialism is communism, and requires the elimination of private property, is odd. It is way to well known to be untrue. Or are you simply trying to convince stupid people??
http://www.pslweb.org/party/marxism-101/eight-myths-about-socialism.htmlMyth #1: Socialists want to take away your property
This myth confuses private property with personal property. When socialists talk about the abolition of private property, they are referring to the socialization of the means of production—the resources and equipment that create
The above is from a socialist web site. You would think they would know.
Instead of wanting to take away people’s private property, socialists want more people to have more private property than ever before.
Socialism and communism are alike in that both are systems of production for use based on public ownership of the means of production
This from one of the few major marxist sites. You would think they would know.
But, amazon being amazon will keep on saying that socialism means the elimination of private property. Though it is completely obvious that she is wrong, and posting incorrect economic information while posing as an expert on the subject.
the, the economic expert says:
OK. Private property it is. Not just of the wealthy Bourgeois) but private property in general. Now, that to most people is personal property, but if you would rather, call it private property. Because, you see, the property will largely still exist, but be owned by the state.What the hell is your purpose here? Seriously? Did anyone say that personal property should be abolished under the Communist Manifesto? Karl Marx only advocates for private property (which is essentially bourgeois property) to be abolish.
In communism, the end of relations based on force, on violence and the universal antagonism of each against all … will presuppose the end of ownership rights over people and things. The abolition of private property means putting an end to their foundations: the domination of the “other” (man or nature); appropriation, which only perceives the other in relation to utility; and the generalized degradation of the relations between men and also between the latter and nature.
The Communists' theory simply describes a historical movement underway at this very moment. This includes the abolition of private property.
Got it yet??? didn't think so.
There is not a single thing you can feasibly teach me, or anyone else for that matter.
I have the sources. You have none. Because you are wrong. Just trying to help, me dear. Why you get so insultive toward me when I am just giving you the facts is beyond me. I actually appreciate truth. But I require links to impartial sources, which you are incapable of. How is it going, setting up that theory of economics called the Amazon school of economics???
So, still can not name a nation that is primarily libertarian. got it.