California shows how to balance budget

When it's in the bank and California has actually lived within its means without bullshit accounting tricks, I'll admit I was wrong. Now, will you when those revenues fail to materialize? I doubt it.

I am not the one here who avoids facts regualrly its you people who do that

Got it, you'll never admit you were wrong. Don't worry, we'll be here to point that out.

and you will do what when the state runs a surplus?

deny the facts just like you always do
 
I hope California has figured out their financial issues and are able to move to a strong economy.

Since I advocate 'home rule', or the right of a state to govern itself based on the wishes of the majority of voters in that area, how they achieve it is not my place to say.

If California has a strong economy, it will benefit our country as a whole.
 
Too funny, I gave you the link.

The article shows the Treasury Charts.

Now quit leaving me nasty messages kid, we aren't going to cyber.
 
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.


Your world means nothing
 
Because you say so? :lol: But hey, I suppose you know more about economic trends than many prominent economists that have pointed out numerous times where higher rates resulted in less revenue. Dr Laffer is lying, but TM knows economics! :cuckoo:

Crawl back in your fat ass hole troll.


Not to mention the fact that the dumb ass actually MOVED BACK TO CALIFORNIA.

Shows what a clueless wonder she is.

My state has a balenced budget does yours?

LMAO Not according to this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/us/california-debt-higher-than-earlier-estimates.html?_r=0

According to this for 2012 Cali is 28 BILLION IN DEBT.

Oh and my State??

Its digging its way out.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...-most-in-decades-fuels-rally-muni-credit.html
 
Last edited:
Too funny, I gave you the link.

The article shows the Treasury Charts.

Now quit leaving me nasty messages kid, we aren't going to cyber.

Its shows charts and then gives NO link to the numbers
 
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.

Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.

And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.
 
Not to mention the fact that the dumb ass actually MOVED BACK TO CALIFORNIA.

Shows what a clueless wonder she is.

My state has a balenced budget does yours?

LMAO Not according to this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/us/california-debt-higher-than-earlier-estimates.html?_r=0

According to this for 2012 Cali is 28 BILLIOIN IN DEBT.

California Debt Higher Than Earlier Estimates, a Task Force Reports

By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH

Published: September 20, 2012



from your link.

Your link is MONTHS old asshole
 
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.

Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.

And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.

Fuck laffers book.

Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.


Get links which PROVE what you claimed
 
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.

Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.

And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.

Fuck laffers book.

Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.


Get links which PROVE what you claimed

Find your own damn links, I gave you the sources. Do your own damn research.

The idea that you know more than Dr Art Laffer about these things...priceless!
 
Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.

And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.

Fuck laffers book.

Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.


Get links which PROVE what you claimed

Find your own damn links, I gave you the sources. Do your own damn research.

The idea that you know more than Dr Art Laffer about these things...priceless!

Dr laffer is a partisan hack you asshole.

Now you cant provide ANY links can you?



Now why do you believe in shit that is only stated on partisan hack sites?
 
see what they do readers?


NEVER NEVER leave a cons claims unchecked for sources.

they are idiots and dishonest to boot
 
Fuck laffers book.

Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.


Get links which PROVE what you claimed

Find your own damn links, I gave you the sources. Do your own damn research.

The idea that you know more than Dr Art Laffer about these things...priceless!

Dr laffer is a partisan hack you asshole.

Now you cant provide ANY links can you?



Now why do you believe in shit that is only stated on partisan hack sites?

Hack sites like the WSJ and public statements from California State Controller John Chiang? Whatever.
 

Forum List

Back
Top