Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When it's in the bank and California has actually lived within its means without bullshit accounting tricks, I'll admit I was wrong. Now, will you when those revenues fail to materialize? I doubt it.
I am not the one here who avoids facts regualrly its you people who do that
Got it, you'll never admit you were wrong. Don't worry, we'll be here to point that out.
I am not the one here who avoids facts regualrly its you people who do that
Got it, you'll never admit you were wrong. Don't worry, we'll be here to point that out.
and you will do what when the state runs a surplus?
deny the facts just like you always do
Because you say so? But hey, I suppose you know more about economic trends than many prominent economists that have pointed out numerous times where higher rates resulted in less revenue. Dr Laffer is lying, but TM knows economics!
Crawl back in your fat ass hole troll.
Not to mention the fact that the dumb ass actually MOVED BACK TO CALIFORNIA.
Shows what a clueless wonder she is.
My state has a balenced budget does yours?
Too funny, I gave you the link.
The article shows the Treasury Charts.
Now quit leaving me nasty messages kid, we aren't going to cyber.
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Not to mention the fact that the dumb ass actually MOVED BACK TO CALIFORNIA.
Shows what a clueless wonder she is.
My state has a balenced budget does yours?
LMAO Not according to this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/us/california-debt-higher-than-earlier-estimates.html?_r=0
According to this for 2012 Cali is 28 BILLIOIN IN DEBT.
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.
And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.
yea but your a fucki ng liar who still refuses to back up with fact your claim that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.
And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.
Fuck laffers book.
Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Get links which PROVE what you claimed
Too funny, I gave you the link.
The article shows the Treasury Charts.
Now quit leaving me nasty messages kid, we aren't going to cyber.
Take that up with your state's Controller and the WSJ. I cited cases in which higher tax rates lead to less revenue. There are several more in Laffer's book. You can deny all you like, those are the facts.
And please, stop spamming my profile. It's just silly.
Fuck laffers book.
Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Get links which PROVE what you claimed
Find your own damn links, I gave you the sources. Do your own damn research.
The idea that you know more than Dr Art Laffer about these things...priceless!
And TM goes into full meltdown mode.
Fuck laffers book.
Go get facts which PROVE like you claimed that taxes cause revenue decreases.
Get links which PROVE what you claimed
Find your own damn links, I gave you the sources. Do your own damn research.
The idea that you know more than Dr Art Laffer about these things...priceless!
Dr laffer is a partisan hack you asshole.
Now you cant provide ANY links can you?
Now why do you believe in shit that is only stated on partisan hack sites?