Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #601
So it's true then. Your LGBT case for the predatory lesbians on a Christian-bakery witch-hunt is to have the USSC judicially-abolish parts of the US Constitution that protect freedom of religion.
Anyone want to bet the USSC won't be so bold as to try to rewrite the US Constitution twice in three years?
No, they probably will, because all the precedents are on the side of the Lesbians here.
We've already established that public accommodation laws are constitutional and religion isn't a good enough reason to overrule them.
You mean court precedents. Wrong ones since "same-sex intimacy" (see Obergefell page 7 Obergefell v. Hodges | Obergefell V. Hodges | Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution) or "homosexuals" or "gays or lesbians" (used interchangeably) don't have ANY enumerated protections in the Constitution.
First, the courts didn't use 'same sex intimacy' and 'homosexuals' interchangeably. You merely equate them, then bizarrely assume that they must mean the same thing. They don't. You're merely confused.
Second, read the 9th amendment. Rights need not be enumerated to exist.
Try again, this time while not ignoring the Bill of Rights.
Nope, read again:
Obergefell...the "right" in total from which the quote on same-sex intimacy used intertwined with same-sex, homosexual & gays & lesbians was taken.
Obergefell v. Hodges | Obergefell V. Hodges | Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution
Page 7 of Obergefell Opinion:
Until the mid-20th century, same-sex intimacy long had been condemned as immoral by the state itself in most Western nations, a belief often embodied in the criminal law. For this reason, among others, many persons did not deem homosexuals to have dignity in their own distinct identity. A truthful declaration by same-sex couples of what was in their hearts had to remain unspoken. Even when a greater awareness of the humanity and integrity of homosexual persons came in the period after World War II, the argument that gays and lesbians had a just claim to dignity was in conflict with both law and widespread social conventions. Same-sex intimacy remained a crime in many States. Gays and lesbians were prohibited from most government employment, barred from military service, excluded under immigration laws, targeted by police, and burdened in their rights to associate.
And, non enumerated rights in direct and real conflict with enumerated rights (Christian), will not dominate enumerated rights. You will find this out soon enough. Plus, you cannot extend "rights not enumerated" to just some of your favorite kink-intimacy behaviors and leave the rest out. Either polygamy-kink and incest-kink are also legal "marriage" or "gay marriage" isn't a right.