Buzzfeed: President Trump Directed Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Baz Ares, Jan 17, 2019.

  1. Fort Fun Indiana
    Offline

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    33,408
    Thanks Received:
    2,104
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +15,058
    Sorry, peddle your whataboutism elsewhere.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Zorro!
    Offline

    Zorro! Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    4,342
    Thanks Received:
    652
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +3,003
    I have a sense that the Russian Collusion Truthers are not persuadable by the complete lack of evidence for the criminal conspiracies you claim occurred.

    Here's your problem:

    You and official DC blew 2015 when you laughed at Trump coming down the escalator. Then when he secured the nomination, officials did a very bad thing. They decided that they needed a "insurance policy" in case he won. That is, they needed a "insurance policy" against the US Electorate.

    1.) When did the FBI first learn that Steele’s dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party and written by a partisan who, by his own admission, was desperate to defeat Trump? Documents and testimony show senior DOJ official Bruce Ohr first told his colleagues about Steele’s bias and connections to Clinton in late summer 2016. A string of FBI emails — some before the bureau secured its first surveillance warrant — raised concerns about Steele’s motive, employer and credibility.

    2.) How much evidence of innocence did the FBI possess against two of its early targets, Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page? There are indications that agents secured evidence of the innocence of both men from informants, intercepts and other techniques that was never disclosed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges in the case. Further there are also hints that learning exactly the sort of surveillance used on Page also may surprise some people.

    3.) Why was the Steele dossier used as primary evidence in the FISA warrant against Page when it had not been corroborated? FBI testimony shows agents had just begun checking out the dossier when its elements were used as supporting evidence, and that spreadsheets kept by the bureau during the verification process validated only small pieces of the dossier while concluding other parts were false or unprovable. And, of course, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted that, after nine months of investigation, the dossier’s core allegation of Trump-Russia collusion could not be substantiated.

    Click on over to review additional questions:

    Ten post-Mueller questions that could turn the tables on Russia collusion investigators
     
  3. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    77,462
    Thanks Received:
    5,407
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +29,579
    challenged and lost.
     
  4. Zorro!
    Offline

    Zorro! Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    4,342
    Thanks Received:
    652
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +3,003
    I have a sense that the Russian Collusion Truthers are not persuadable by the complete lack of evidence for the criminal conspiracies you claim occurred.

    Here's your problem:

    You and official DC blew 2015 when you laughed at Trump coming down the escalator. Then when he secured the nomination, officials did a very bad thing. They decided something dark and evil, that they needed a "insurance policy" in case he won. That is, they needed a "insurance policy" against the US Electorate.

    Then the folks that blew 2015, blew 2016 and Trump was elected. Rather than question themselves and their assumption, they then decided that something untoward had occurred, because, how could them be wrong? Why we were "tricked"! By the Ruskies, no less!

    Now these morons blew another 2.5 years before finally admitting what was obvious all along. Trump won and they are ignorant dummies carried away with their own sense of self-importance.

    Now comes the very difficult consequences of their dark actions. How many crimes were committed by who in weaponizing the US Intelligence Agencies against a domestic political opponent?

    Why were Steele’s biases and his ties to the Clinton campaign — as well as evidence of innocence and flaws in the FISA evidence — never disclosed to the FISA court, as required by law and court practice?

    Why did FBI and U.S. intelligence officials leak stories about evidence in the emerging Russia probe before they corroborated collusion, and were any of those leaks designed to “create” evidence that could be cited in the courts of law and public opinion to justify the continuation of a flawed investigation?

    Did Comey improperly handle classified information when he distributed memos of his private conversations with Trump to his lawyers and a friend and ordered a leak that he hoped would cause the appointment of a special counsel after his firing as FBI director?

    Ten post-Mueller questions that could turn the tables on Russia collusion investigators

    I do not expect Democrats to be smart enough to shut up and walkaway. Now that its clear that Trump beat them fair and square and that even after whitewashing Hillary's espionage that they launched a scorched earth witch hunt on Trump and cannot show any probable cause courtroom level evidence of a single crime by him, that patience with Democrats and the Collusion Truthers is going to drop through the floor. Their continued carping is going to keep visibility on them as evidence of very serious and ACTUAL crimes becomes harder and harder to ignore.

    If it becomes clear that some of them gave false statements under oath or mishandled classified information, I think some of them are going to end up behind bars.

    Remember, in our system THE GOVERNMENT swears a solemn oath that they have been completely truthful and transparent in every sense, on every warrant applications. These FISA warrant applications are going to really get careful scrutiny to determine how our Intelligence Community was misdirected against a domestic political opponent.
     
  5. Zorro!
    Offline

    Zorro! Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    4,342
    Thanks Received:
    652
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +3,003
    I have a sense that the Russian Collusion Truthers are not persuadable by the complete lack of evidence for the criminal conspiracies you claim occurred.

    Here's your problem:

    You and official DC blew 2015 when you laughed at Trump coming down the escalator. Then when he secured the nomination, officials did a very bad thing. They decided that they needed a "insurance policy" in case he won. That is, they needed a "insurance policy" against the US Electorate.
    Did the CIA, FBI or Obama White House engage in activities — such as the activation of intelligence sources or electronic surveillance — before the opening of an official counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016?

    Did U.S. intelligence, the FBI or the Obama administration use or encourage friendly spy agencies in Great Britain, Australia, Ukraine, Italy or elsewhere to gather evidence on the Trump campaign, leak evidence, or get around U.S. restrictions on spying on Americans?

    Did the CIA or Obama intelligence apparatus try to lure or pressure the FBI into opening a Trump collusion probe or acknowledge its existence before the election? Text messages between alleged FBI lovebirds Strzok and Page raised concerns about “pressure” from the White House, the “Agency BS game,” DOJ leaks and the need for an FBI “insurance policy.” And, as Strzok texted at one point in August 2016, quoting a colleague: “The White House is running this.”
     
  6. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    77,462
    Thanks Received:
    5,407
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +29,579
    Well the real big obstruction was when hitlery had her people bleach bit her PC and phones under subpoena. Now that is obstruction with intent. Yet, these fks stay quiet and look at trump at no obstruction and claim he did. too fking funny.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Fort Fun Indiana
    Offline

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    33,408
    Thanks Received:
    2,104
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +15,058
    Sorry,not an appropriate response to my post.
     
  8. Zorro!
    Offline

    Zorro! Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    4,342
    Thanks Received:
    652
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +3,003
    You cut a lot out of it.

    Here's your problem:

    You and official DC blew 2015 when you laughed at Trump coming down the escalator. Then when he secured the nomination, officials did a very bad thing. They decided that they needed a "insurance policy" in case he won. That is, they needed a "insurance policy" against the US Electorate.

    Did the CIA, FBI or Obama White House engage in activities — such as the activation of intelligence sources or electronic surveillance — before the opening of an official counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016?

    Did U.S. intelligence, the FBI or the Obama administration use or encourage friendly spy agencies in Great Britain, Australia, Ukraine, Italy or elsewhere to gather evidence on the Trump campaign, leak evidence, or get around U.S. restrictions on spying on Americans?

    Did the CIA or Obama intelligence apparatus try to lure or pressure the FBI into opening a Trump collusion probe or acknowledge its existence before the election? Text messages between alleged FBI lovebirds Strzok and Page raised concerns about “pressure” from the White House, the “Agency BS game,” DOJ leaks and the need for an FBI “insurance policy.” And, as Strzok texted at one point in August 2016, quoting a colleague: “The White House is running this.”
     
  9. Fort Fun Indiana
    Offline

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    33,408
    Thanks Received:
    2,104
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +15,058
    Indeed,as it was not relevant to my comments. I actually ignored it.
     
  10. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    77,462
    Thanks Received:
    5,407
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +29,579
    then why did you respond?
     

Share This Page