Buying on the Dip may not Work

[william the wie]

Lower taxes, less regulation, lower tax deductions to prevent a housing bubble and a new hawkish Fed chair is the Trump solution. Love him, hate him, Trump is determined to get real growth with little or no leveraged bubbles in the mix.

As part of the purge of legacy bubbles the four main capital markets: commodities, real estate, bonds and stocks; will be subjected to higher interest rates. This will make selling future growth much harder and cost cutting profitable.

These are not the capital markets you are used to but more like 1945-64. That in turn means a lot leaner leverage mix across the board and therefore much higher savings. 30,000 on the Dow will be much slower coming.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Lower taxes, less regulation, lower tax deductions to prevent a housing bubble and a new hawkish Fed chair is the Trump solution. Love him, hate him, Trump is determined to get real growth with little or no leveraged bubbles in the mix.

As part of the purge of legacy bubbles the four main capital markets: commodities, real estate, bonds and stocks; will be subjected to higher interest rates. This will make selling future growth much harder and cost cutting profitable.

These are not the capital markets you are used to but more like 1945-64. That in turn means a lot leaner leverage mix across the board and therefore much higher savings. 30,000 on the Dow will be much slower coming.

You can stay out of the market and continue to be a victim of liberalism and not make it big in the United States, thus having the government take care of you, or you can invest in companies thus sharing in their profits, making you some good money, for a little time and effort that you put in to study those companies...

 

[william the wie]

It depends mostly on type of stocks. Secure dividend growth as opposed to mostly pie in the sky have been the alternatives in high tech booms going back to at least the 1690s. The dividend payers are more likely to last. the pie in the sky either becomes a dividend payer like Microsoft or they become the next Yahoo.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

It depends mostly on type of stocks. Secure dividend growth as opposed to mostly pie in the sky have been the alternatives in high tech booms going back to at least the 1690s. The dividend payers are more likely to last. the pie in the sky either becomes a dividend payer like Microsoft or they become the next Yahoo.

that is true which was why I had said that with some time and effort you can see what the stock and company you invest in is doing..The cell phone is 10,000 times more powerful than the first computer that sent man to the moon. Most people today only use it for games.

 

[william the wie]

It depends mostly on type of stocks. Secure dividend growth as opposed to mostly pie in the sky have been the alternatives in high tech booms going back to at least the 1690s. The dividend payers are more likely to last. the pie in the sky either becomes a dividend payer like Microsoft or they become the next Yahoo.

that is true which was why I had said that with some time and effort you can see what the stock and company you invest in is doing..The cell phone is 10,000 times more powerful than the first computer that sent man to the moon. Most people today only use it for games.

True. What is worse is that in most cases you can get a discount on buying direct from the company because it costs more than 5% for underwriting.