Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,888
- 90,768
- 3,635
Clearly not as stupid as you as to think Bush was talking about years earlier when he even said, we gave him [Hussein] a chance to allow the inspectors back in.... which happened in 2002.Just how stupid are you? It must've sucked to be the dumbest guy in class all your life.Holyfuckingshit!It is a lie when said claim is investigated and determined to be false, which is what happened.Reporting that you've been told that someone thinks that a 9.11 hijacker met ... is not the same as lying about it.Lying is claiming a 9.11 hijacker met with Iraqi officials in Prague when the CIA investigates the veracity of such a claim and determines it didn't happen.
Lying is claiming we invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussein wouldn't let the inspectors in when the inspectors were let in and provided unfettered access to every site they visited.
Seems to me, you're the one who can't discern a lie from being wrong.
That is some tortured logic you need to fool yourself; however, it is a lie to claim Hussein didn't let the inspectors in when he did. You'll note, I didn't say he never let them in ... I said he not only let them in, he never denied them access. At no point after the inspectors returned to Iraq in November, 2002, were they "not let in" to any site.Stating that one of the reasons we are going into Iraq is because Saddam failed to let the inspectors in every time they wanted to go in every place they wanted to go and without any delay is not the same as saying they were never allowed to go in. You're problem is you are incapable of reading in context. Your context is after the fact... you are taking your hindsight goggles, your BDS, your he must have lied belief, and then looking for the lie to prop up the reason for your BDS. Give it up Bush is retired.
Determined to be false is not the same as determined to be a lie.
If I say PI is 3.141 and some one comes around and proves that to be false because it's closer to 3.14159 that does not mean I lied. It just means my statement was not correct.
In your world, innocently being off by 1/1000th on pi us the same as letting America believe Iraq was involved in 9.11 when they knew it wasn't??
There were no times since the inspectors went back in. Your logic that Bush was talking about Hussein blocking inspectors from some sites years earlier is as stupid as if the Japanese had surrendered in 1943 and we dropped nukes on them anyway in 1945 and said, we told Japan to surrender, but they wouldn't surrender, so after a reasonable request, we dropped two nukes on them.There were times in which Hussein did not let them in.. additionally they were not let in to the locations where the missing bombs and buried bombs were as proven by the ones we found and the shipments that went to syria.