Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,861
- 90,690
- 3,635
I know of only the one report I showed you which clearly stated the 9.11 hijacker did not meet with Iraqi officials in Prague.Yes or no there were conflicting reports on the matter. Easy question.Even if Cheney didn't see that White House memo, the Bush administration knew Cheney's claim on national television was wrong. Yet they didn't clear that up for nearly two years. Cheney may or many not have lied that day, but the administration most certainly lied on that matter.Conflicting reports? memo? Who knew about that "memo" did Cheney read it? Did he skim it? Did he forget? Again, lie and mistake are two different things. Was Cheney making his statement in view of that memo? in spite of that memo? What was the view of that memo, who reported it was some other pakistani? What investigation? Who wrote the memo? Dick? One of his advisors? Did Dick ask for the memo to be quashed? Did Bush? So what if that one guy did not go to one place? Does that mean Saddam was not the evil terrorist that the democrats claimed he was for the prior decade, because one guy did not go to one place for one meeting?Rejecting a claim is not, "pretty well confirmed," by any stretch of the imagination.Excuse? For what? you not understanding what the term "pretty well" means? ROLLS EYES...Not only was it was not "pretty well confirmed," the notion was actually rejected ...
Dated 12.1.2001 ... Declassified white House memo on Mohammed Atta in Prague
SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION OF THE TRAVEL TO THE CZECH REPUBLIC OF TERRORIST MOHAMED ((ATTA)) REVEALED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL WHO ATTEMPTED TO ENTER THE CZECH REPUBLIC ON 31 MAY 2000 AT [---] AIRPORT WAS NOT THE ATTA WHO ATTACKED THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001. [---] IT WAS A PAKISTANI NATIONAL [---]
... next excuse ...
What report are you speaking of which said there was a meeting?