rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 513
- 48
- Banned
- #101
wade said:Ummm.. more trees today than 200 years ago? Huh?
That's right, if you cannot find a legitimate counter argument, attack the source. Try discrediting any of the arguments made in the article, because this tactic is bogus and even the conservatives here know it.
Who's talking about killing off humans? What we are talking about is preventing the rape of the environment to satisfy the purest of greed on the part of the select few who happen to be in power at the moment.
You are describing fascism, not the US Republic. In the USA, you cannot vote away someones "inalienable rights", no matter how much of a majority you can muster. I suggest you take a civics class and learn what it means to be an American.
Look wade, conservatives care about the environment. But I'm not willing to stifle the growth of humanity for a bunch of theories.
What pisses me off about the "sustainable development" movement is they do nothing for development. They oppose developers. They don't investigate the science of how to develop sustainably. They don't offer solutions. All they say is "conserve". That's not good enough. At their core, they're a bunch of commies.