jillian
Princess
- Thread starter
- #21
he knows nothing about law.
he knows nothing about the anti-discrimination laws.
he knows nothing about anything.
and yet he is spewing about how men are worth more than women so it isn't discriminatory to pay men more than women for the same work.
note: it wouldn't be so bad if he was just an ignorant twit. it's pretty awful that he makes such a show of it.
First, I have no idea who you are talking about, and you might be entirely correct about him.
That said, from the few posts you have made on this subject, you are obviously missing the point of the Wal-Mart case yourself. Is it possible that your lack of understanding, and your knee jerk reaction to the case itself, without looking at any of the facts, is contributing to his misunderstanding of the case?
look at the link.
and no. i don't miss the point about supreme court cases.
why would you think i hadn't read the case. I read the petition for cert. and i read the court's order.
did you? or you just feel like sniping?
Last edited: