Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
he knows nothing about law.
he knows nothing about the anti-discrimination laws.
he knows nothing about anything.
and yet he is spewing about how men are worth more than women so it isn't discriminatory to pay men more than women for the same work.
note: it wouldn't be so bad if he was just an ignorant twit. it's pretty awful that he makes such a show of it.
First, I have no idea who you are talking about, and you might be entirely correct about him.
That said, from the few posts you have made on this subject, you are obviously missing the point of the Wal-Mart case yourself. Is it possible that your lack of understanding, and your knee jerk reaction to the case itself, without looking at any of the facts, is contributing to his misunderstanding of the case?
The link was not part of the OP.
You certainly missed the point of Citizens United, and Ledbetter. The problem there was not that the court did not understand the discrimination, the problem was that the law itself restricted her right to sue. That was the right decision, and in no way prevented her from seeking redress under different laws, or even a different section of the same law.
By the way, Congress can remove that statue of limitations. The courts doing so is completely improper, just like them imposing one would be.
The link was not part of the OP.
You certainly missed the point of Citizens United, and Ledbetter. The problem there was not that the court did not understand the discrimination, the problem was that the law itself restricted her right to sue. That was the right decision, and in no way prevented her from seeking redress under different laws, or even a different section of the same law.
By the way, Congress can remove that statue of limitations. The courts doing so is completely improper, just like them imposing one would be.
g-d you're a moron.
This cannot be news to you my dear.The link was not part of the OP.
You certainly missed the point of Citizens United, and Ledbetter. The problem there was not that the court did not understand the discrimination, the problem was that the law itself restricted her right to sue. That was the right decision, and in no way prevented her from seeking redress under different laws, or even a different section of the same law.
By the way, Congress can remove that statue of limitations. The courts doing so is completely improper, just like them imposing one would be.
g-d you're a moron.
Seeing as how this is a personal attack on another member shouldn't this be in the Flame zone?
lol.. ijit doesn't know what a statute of limitations is or what the decision in ledbetter held, but he's going to tell everyone how to be a great pretend constitutionalist.
