British Understatement?

Discussion in 'Europe' started by Flanders, Jan 15, 2013.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    Please watch the video first to best understand the topic:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq2Vp86ntlU&feature=player_embedded]US wants UK in EU: 'Cameron insincere, America should mind its own business' - YouTube[/ame]​

    Nobody told MP Gerard Batten the Brits are famous for understatement. He got off a couple of good ones that go right to the heart of the matter:

    I wish Batten and everybody else would stop confusing “The Americans” with our federal government. The two are separate entities.

    Batten was right in telling Hussein to piss-off; nevertheless, I have to say that he does not understand Hussein’s real concern. All of the talk about “one telephone call” and “America’s interests” is nonsense. America’s federal government —— NOT the American people —— have but one interest. Hussein is out to destroy America’s sovereignty along with the very concept of sovereign nations.

    Naturally, Hussein & Company do not want to see a “Sovereignty Movement” get off the ground should the UK withdraw from the EU. Hell, those dumb limeys might even give a bunch of countries the idea that dropping out of the United Nations is in their best interests. Then where will the New World Order crowd go!

    Now, if only a few members of Congress would tell Hussein to mind his own freaking business. And please do not tell me that surrendering America’s sovereignty to a global government is the business of every president.

    Let me close with some good advice for everybody in Washington:


     
  2. RoccoR
    Offline

    RoccoR Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    6,306
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Reynoldsburg, OH
    Ratings:
    +3,705
    et al,

    We should mind our own business.

    The US should adopt a new way of doing business; through non-interventionist means. We are not the Super Power we once were. Our influence is draining away. And each time were interfere with some one and fail, we lose just a bit more respect.

    Most Respectfully,
    R
     
  3. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    Hussein & Company screwed up everything they touched in the first term. From the way the second term is starting out it seems they will continue the country’s losing streak:

    British sovereignty is obviously linked to a global government ideology. Aside from the Brits, the Arab Spring, terrorist groups in Africa, riots in European cities, etc., look like a global government scare tactic to me. The violence is real enough, but I have to believe it was all engineered by intelligence agencies controlled by ruling elitists. To believe otherwise is to believe that the people running First World governments all have a collective death wish. Or else they are so dumb, and so powerless, they can only standby and helplessly watch Islam march towards a worldwide caliphate unhindered. The question is WHY is it happening?

    Answer: Seemingly uncontrolled violence is the best way to stampede the American people into finally saying “We need a global government to end the violence for our own self-protection.”

    I’m sure there are Muslims heading Islamic governments who will benefit from a global government as much as will America’s traitors. Unfortunately for the average Muslim they are being setup as cannon fodder.

    Before the deceivers are in position to unleash all of the military force they command, Muslims would do well to ask why they have been allowed to infiltrate so many countries? Why every government in the countries they’ve infiltrated welcomed Muslims, protected them; and stood by when they began to tear down their host country? What questions would Muslims be asking if Muslim governments did the same thing with Christians?

    Remember, the EU working with national governments is responsible for mass migrations from the Muslim world to Europe. The UK getting out of the EU will bring the house of cards down in Europe. The ripple effect has to spread to the UN and the move towards global government. That is what Hussein is trying to stop.

    Just so I’m not misinterpreted let me be clear about one thing. Jihad must be defeated once and for all. Global government is the NOT the way to do it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013

Share This Page