British Navy ships have no land attack cruise missiles - treadmills take their place

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2021
41,172
57,953
3,488
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
Britain's £6bn fleet of Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be - because the weapons were too expensive to buy



The lack of weapons on the Type 45 warships has raised concerns the Navy is falling even further behind the United States, with drastic shortages of sailors also prompting warnings.

The warships were created to house the Mark 41 Vertical Launching System installed in their bows, enabling them to launch cruise missiles, but are instead accommodating treadmills.

The space has only been used as a gym for crew because the Navy did not obtain the weapons due to them being too expensive, The Telegraph reported.

Last month the US Navy Secretary, Carlos Del Toro, said that 'given the near-term threats to the UK and US', investments in the Royal Navy are 'significantly important'.



Britain Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be

LOL

Fuck me runnin'.....What a pathetic nation.

This is why I don't give two shits about the Uke conflict....The Brits can't afford StL cruise missiles and the Squareheads can't produce but two Leopard IIs a month.....They are damn good at virtue signaling with their hands held out though.
 
Another example of why we should not be providing welfare to other countries. Why should they pay for their own defense when Uncle Sam will do it for them? Even when Uncle Sam is $34 trillion in debt?
 
I have been listening to many Brits warn their nation especially since many presume WWIII is going to occur in our lifetime.

Apparently the entire size of their army is 75,000 (or one of their branches anyways, maybe their navy) and will be down to 52k or so by 2030.

Basically the Brits have been wrong about so much for so long and they haven't been able to maintain a strong, patriotic nation willing to sacrifice. Trump was right and he forced NATO to ante up. All nations should be able to spend 2% a year on their military.
 
Another example of why we should not be providing welfare to other countries. Why should they pay for their own defense when Uncle Sam will do it for them? Even when Uncle Sam is $34 trillion in debt?
You would have shot down the Marshall plan.
 
Basically the Brits have been wrong about so much for so long and they haven't been able to maintain a strong, patriotic nation willing to sacrifice. Trump was right and he forced NATO to ante up. All nations should be able to spend 2% a year on their military.
What you leave out is what they spend the 2% on. Are you talking weapons or salaries? The point should revolve around mutual defense capabilities, and not just spending.
 
Another example of why we should not be providing welfare to other countries. Why should they pay for their own defense when Uncle Sam will do it for them? Even when Uncle Sam is $34 trillion in debt?



Like Rand Paul said! :thup:


And totally right he is.


Rand Paul Questions U.S. Role: ‘When Did We Become the Sugar Daddy of the World?’​

 
Like Rand Paul said! :thup:


And totally right he is.


Rand Paul Questions U.S. Role: ‘When Did We Become the Sugar Daddy of the World?’​


We could have saved $2 trillion by not lying to start a war in Iraq that brought about ISIS, and the rise in Iran.
 
Britain's £6bn fleet of Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be - because the weapons were too expensive to buy



The lack of weapons on the Type 45 warships has raised concerns the Navy is falling even further behind the United States, with drastic shortages of sailors also prompting warnings.

The warships were created to house the Mark 41 Vertical Launching System installed in their bows, enabling them to launch cruise missiles, but are instead accommodating treadmills.

The space has only been used as a gym for crew because the Navy did not obtain the weapons due to them being too expensive, The Telegraph reported.

Last month the US Navy Secretary, Carlos Del Toro, said that 'given the near-term threats to the UK and US', investments in the Royal Navy are 'significantly important'.



Britain Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be

LOL

Fuck me runnin'.....What a pathetic nation.

This is why I don't give two shits about the Uke conflict....The Brits can't afford StL cruise missiles and the Squareheads can't produce but two Leopard IIs a month.....They are damn good at virtue signaling with their hands held out though.

But at least with those treadmills, the Limeys would be in good enough shape to run away from the fight.

I always try to look at the bright side of everything.
 
We could have saved $2 trillion by not lying to start a war in Iraq that brought about ISIS, and the rise in Iran.

Make sure you write a letter to former President Jimmy Carter, explaining all that, ok?
 
Britain's £6bn fleet of Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be - because the weapons were too expensive to buy



The lack of weapons on the Type 45 warships has raised concerns the Navy is falling even further behind the United States, with drastic shortages of sailors also prompting warnings.

The warships were created to house the Mark 41 Vertical Launching System installed in their bows, enabling them to launch cruise missiles, but are instead accommodating treadmills.

The space has only been used as a gym for crew because the Navy did not obtain the weapons due to them being too expensive, The Telegraph reported.

Last month the US Navy Secretary, Carlos Del Toro, said that 'given the near-term threats to the UK and US', investments in the Royal Navy are 'significantly important'.



Britain Navy destroyers have GYMS where land attack missiles should be

LOL

Fuck me runnin'.....What a pathetic nation.

This is why I don't give two shits about the Uke conflict....The Brits can't afford StL cruise missiles and the Squareheads can't produce but two Leopard IIs a month.....They are damn good at virtue signaling with their hands held out though.
Brexit did a pretty solid number on their tax base.

Thanks conservatives.
 
I sent a copy to Colin Powell, but it came back, return to sender, addressee unknown.

You can't really equate "moderate" Republican RINOs like GW and Colin Powell to the modern-day Republicans led by Donald J. Trump. They are two different animals all together.

While the former RINO Republicans stood for what you might call "bipartisanship" and "reaching across the aisle", what they were actually engaged in was kowtowing to powerful liberal Democrat interests in the same manner British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain appeased Nazi Germany.

This is no longer your grandfather's Republican Party. This is the party of America first, not "America last" as the Democrats believe. The Republican Party is the party of America, the party of prosperity, freedom, individuality, and the party of Donald J. Trump.

Accept it if you will, or deny it. Whichever way you choose determines whether you will be remembered forever, or forever washed away by the tide of history.

It's up to you to decide.
 
You would have shot down the Marshall plan.
The Soviets should have been pushed back into Ukeland.....Patton was correct.

Germany/Austria should have been turned into a agrarian society and our arms money spent in Poland, Czech Republic, and the other countries that became Soviet satellite states.

Then again hindsight is 20/20 so we have what we have.
 

Forum List

Back
Top