Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs
- Thread starter Vigilante
- Start date
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,970
- 52,238
- 2,290
And they're going to turn their backs on that recognition. They have an appropriate example to follow.[...] For those who do not know------artists are desperate people------very few
make a living from their work. One of the issues over which they
are OBSESSED "how to make a name"------any exposure of their names is a GOOD THING
Israel is not an apartheid state, anyone who thinks it is is a liberal...hence, not a rational thinker....
Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
When you're a liberal, insanity is just part of the equation!
Last Days Watchman ^ In an initiative called “Artists for Palestine,” some 700 British artists, including Roger Waters, Brian Eno, Mike Leigh, Ken Loach and Richard Ashcroft, made a pledge, February 14, to boycott Israel in reaction to what they termed “the Palestinian catastrophe,” according to the Jerusalem Post. Catastrophe? It is what is happening around Israel. Syria, Iraq and other Islamic nations around Israel are suffering: Muslims are killing Christians. In all the Muslim nations in the Middle East, the same pattern has repeated itself...
Wow, ya mean Brits don't like us? They still mad about our kicking their asses out of Israel?
And they're going to turn their backs on that recognition. They have an appropriate example to follow.[...] For those who do not know------artists are desperate people------very few
make a living from their work. One of the issues over which they
are OBSESSED "how to make a name"------any exposure of their names is a GOOD THING
Israel is not an apartheid state, anyone who thinks it is is a liberal...hence, not a rational thinker....
I am a liberal-------I do not think Israel engages in apartheid----
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #26
Vig----do you know what form this "boycott by artists" is supposed to take? why would anyone care? Is Israel
supposed to be interested in the work of british artists ???
If it's strictly PROPAGANDA, it matters, as you see anti-Semitic hatred being spread PRIMARILY by mudslimes all over Europe, as they make that a caliphate! Look at the RAPE states for all of Europe, and realize that this is what these animals do!
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,970
- 52,238
- 2,290
a list of Arab members of the Israeli Knesset....
List of Arab members of the Knesset - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
do any of the Arab Muslim countries or the Palestinian authority have Jewish members in their governing bodies........?
List of Arab members of the Knesset - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
do any of the Arab Muslim countries or the Palestinian authority have Jewish members in their governing bodies........?
Vig----do you know what form this "boycott by artists" is supposed to take? why would anyone care? Is Israel
supposed to be interested in the work of british artists ???
If it's strictly PROPAGANDA, it matters, as you see anti-Semitic hatred being spread PRIMARILY by mudslimes all over Europe, as they make that a caliphate! Look at the RAPE states for all of Europe, and realize that this is what these animals do!
The "glorious age of Islamic conquest" which built the
ISLAMIC EMPIRE was based on rape------the amount of
rape committed by muslims for the glory the BEAUTY OF
ISLAAM is staggering. The "rules of engagement" are
detailed in the Koran------rape them, and then enslave them
As though American Christians haven't been killing Muslims in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, the same pattern repeating itself.Syria, Iraq and other Islamic nations around Israel are suffering: Muslims are killing Christians. In all the Muslim nations in the Middle East, the same pattern has repeated itself...
So are they just returning the historical favour??
ISIS video appears to show beheadings of Egyptian Coptic Christians in Libya - CNN.com
Greg
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #32
Sweden: Rape Capital of the West
Gatestone Institute ^
Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 700%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa. Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes. In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to...
Gatestone Institute ^
Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 700%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa. Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes. In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to...
Sweden: Rape Capital of the West
Gatestone Institute ^
Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 700%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa. Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes. In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to...
Remember when liberals claimed Sweden as a sorta liberated sexual Nirvana??
THE WORLD; Sweden Redefines Sexual Revolution
By WILLIAM E. SCHMIDT
Published: March 22, 1992
STOCKHOLM— These days, foreign journalists come to Katarina Lindahl's office searching for sin. "There was a man here not long ago from Holland, writing about Sweden and sex," said Ms. Lindahl, who is the executive director of the Swedish Association for Sex Education. "He said he couldn't find it himself, so he asked me for help. I had to tell him, things aren't like they used to be."
From the 1950's through the early 1970's, Sweden was synonymous with the idea of an unfettered and open sexuality, a permissive, even promiscuous, society at the cutting edge of the sexual revolution. In Stockholm, there were clubs with live sex acts that drew tour groups from Asia and America. In the cinema, there were films like "I am Curious (Yellow)," a 1969 movie that candidly explored the sexual and political awakening of a young woman, and provoked the wrath of censors in the United States.
THE WORLD - Sweden Redefines Sexual Revolution - NYTimes.com
Seems Sexual Liberation has its violent side!! (This from 1992)
Greg
Last edited:
Steinlight
VIP Member
- Jan 30, 2014
- 4,508
- 289
- 85
I don't see what Muslims raping has to do with boycotting Israel. At the moment, the UK Government is complicit is covering up and not prosecuting muslim rape gangs in places like Rotherham, while they also support Israel. So I don't see how the points here are mutually exclusive.
In fact, many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel but support cracking down on these muslim gangs, stopping muslim immigration and beginning repatriation in some form or another. So I think you are creating a dichotomy that doesn't exist.
In fact, many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel but support cracking down on these muslim gangs, stopping muslim immigration and beginning repatriation in some form or another. So I think you are creating a dichotomy that doesn't exist.
"many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel"I don't see what Muslims raping has to do with boycotting Israel. At the moment, the UK Government is complicit is covering up and not prosecuting muslim rape gangs in places like Rotherham, while they also support Israel. So I don't see how the points here are mutually exclusive.
In fact, many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel but support cracking down on these muslim gangs, stopping muslim immigration and beginning repatriation in some form or another. So I think you are creating a dichotomy that doesn't exist.
Why?? Of course if you mean sell them rather than "give"then I'm all for that.
Greg
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
Apologist right on cueAs though American Christians haven't been killing Muslims in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, the same pattern repeating itself.Syria, Iraq and other Islamic nations around Israel are suffering: Muslims are killing Christians. In all the Muslim nations in the Middle East, the same pattern has repeated itself...
Steinlight
VIP Member
- Jan 30, 2014
- 4,508
- 289
- 85
Because the Israel/Palestine issue is not our concern as European nationalists. Zionism and Islam are two fundamentally non-European ideologies. It is not our fight or our interest, and we shouldn't be entangling ourselves in the matter. Israel created this problem for themselves when they created nation-state on Arab land, they have solve it on their own. By sending weapons we would be complicit in their ongoing crimes by Israel in the West Bank and Gaza. As nationalists, we don't support a policy of suppressing self determination of the Palestinian people."many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel"I don't see what Muslims raping has to do with boycotting Israel. At the moment, the UK Government is complicit is covering up and not prosecuting muslim rape gangs in places like Rotherham, while they also support Israel. So I don't see how the points here are mutually exclusive.
In fact, many of us on the European Right not only oppose giving money and weapons to Israel but support cracking down on these muslim gangs, stopping muslim immigration and beginning repatriation in some form or another. So I think you are creating a dichotomy that doesn't exist.
Why?? Of course if you mean sell them rather than "give"then I'm all for that.
Greg
I'll let the Special Rapporteur do it for me, here you go.Hmm since you seem to know quite a lot about it, go ahead and describe the alleged 'apartheid practicing ' in the occupied territories.
HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251
OF 15 MARCH 2006 ENTITLED “HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL”
IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251
OF 15 MARCH 2006 ENTITLED “HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL”
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, John Dugard*
http://electronicintifada.net/sites/electronicintifada.net/files/artman2/1/a-hrc-4-17.pdf
VII. RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND APARTHEID
49. Article 1 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1966 defines “racial discrimination” as meaning “any distinction, exclusion, restriction preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life”.
This convention only requires States to prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination. Another convention, the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid of 1973, goes further and criminalizes practices of racial segregation and discrimination that, inter alia, involve the infliction on members of a racial group of serious bodily or mental harm, inhuman or degrading treatment, arbitrary arrest or the deliberate creation of conditions preventing the full development of a racial group by denying to such a group basic human rights and freedoms, including the right to freedom of movement, when such acts are committed “for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them”.
50. Israel vehemently denies the application of these Conventions to its laws and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Despite this denial, it is difficult to resist the conclusion that many of Israel’s laws and practices violate the 1966 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
Israelis are entitled to enter the closed zone between the Wall and the Green Line without permits while Palestinians require permits to enter the closed zone; house demolitions in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are carried out in a manner that discriminates against Palestinians; throughout the West Bank, and particularly in Hebron, settlers are given preferential treatment over Palestinians in respect of movement (major roads are reserved exclusively for settlers), building rights and army protection; and the laws governing family reunification (para. 48 above) unashamedly discriminate against Palestinians.
It is less certain that the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid is violated. The IDF inflicts serious bodily and mental harm on Palestinians, both in Gaza (paras. 8-13 above) and the West Bank (para. 42 above); over 700 Palestinians are held without trial (para. 43 above); prisoners are subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment (para. 44 above); and Palestinians throughout the OPT are denied freedom of movement (paras. 38-41 above).
Can it seriously be denied that the purpose of such action is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them? Israel denies that this is its intention or purpose. But such an intention or purpose may be inferred from the actions described in this report.
61. Israel’s practices and policies in the OPT are frequently likened to those of apartheid South Africa (see, for example, Jimmy Carter, Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid (2006)). On the face of it, occupation and apartheid are two very different regimes. Occupation is not intended to be a long-term oppressive regime but an interim measure that maintains law and order in a territory following an armed conflict and pending a peace settlement. Apartheid is a system of institutionalized racial discrimination that the white minority in South Africa employed to maintain power over the black majority. It was characterized by the denial of political rights to blacks, the fragmentation of the country into white areas and black areas (called Bantustans) and by the imposition on blacks of restrictive measures designed to achieve white superiority, racial separation and white security.
Freedom of movement was restricted by the “pass system” which sought to restrict the entry of blacks into the cities. Apartheid was enforced by a brutal security apparatus in which torture played a significant role. Although the two regimes are different, Israel’s laws and practices in the OPT certainly resemble aspects of apartheid, as shown in paragraphs 49-50 above, and probably fall within the scope of the 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
http://electronicintifada.net/sites/electronicintifada.net/files/artman2/1/a-hrc-4-17.pdf
VII. RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND APARTHEID
49. Article 1 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1966 defines “racial discrimination” as meaning “any distinction, exclusion, restriction preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life”.
This convention only requires States to prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination. Another convention, the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid of 1973, goes further and criminalizes practices of racial segregation and discrimination that, inter alia, involve the infliction on members of a racial group of serious bodily or mental harm, inhuman or degrading treatment, arbitrary arrest or the deliberate creation of conditions preventing the full development of a racial group by denying to such a group basic human rights and freedoms, including the right to freedom of movement, when such acts are committed “for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them”.
50. Israel vehemently denies the application of these Conventions to its laws and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Despite this denial, it is difficult to resist the conclusion that many of Israel’s laws and practices violate the 1966 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
Israelis are entitled to enter the closed zone between the Wall and the Green Line without permits while Palestinians require permits to enter the closed zone; house demolitions in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are carried out in a manner that discriminates against Palestinians; throughout the West Bank, and particularly in Hebron, settlers are given preferential treatment over Palestinians in respect of movement (major roads are reserved exclusively for settlers), building rights and army protection; and the laws governing family reunification (para. 48 above) unashamedly discriminate against Palestinians.
It is less certain that the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid is violated. The IDF inflicts serious bodily and mental harm on Palestinians, both in Gaza (paras. 8-13 above) and the West Bank (para. 42 above); over 700 Palestinians are held without trial (para. 43 above); prisoners are subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment (para. 44 above); and Palestinians throughout the OPT are denied freedom of movement (paras. 38-41 above).
Can it seriously be denied that the purpose of such action is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them? Israel denies that this is its intention or purpose. But such an intention or purpose may be inferred from the actions described in this report.
61. Israel’s practices and policies in the OPT are frequently likened to those of apartheid South Africa (see, for example, Jimmy Carter, Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid (2006)). On the face of it, occupation and apartheid are two very different regimes. Occupation is not intended to be a long-term oppressive regime but an interim measure that maintains law and order in a territory following an armed conflict and pending a peace settlement. Apartheid is a system of institutionalized racial discrimination that the white minority in South Africa employed to maintain power over the black majority. It was characterized by the denial of political rights to blacks, the fragmentation of the country into white areas and black areas (called Bantustans) and by the imposition on blacks of restrictive measures designed to achieve white superiority, racial separation and white security.
Freedom of movement was restricted by the “pass system” which sought to restrict the entry of blacks into the cities. Apartheid was enforced by a brutal security apparatus in which torture played a significant role. Although the two regimes are different, Israel’s laws and practices in the OPT certainly resemble aspects of apartheid, as shown in paragraphs 49-50 above, and probably fall within the scope of the 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
I fail to see where I was apologising for American Christians killing Muslims all over the ME, perhaps you would point it out.Apologist right on cue
Similar threads
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8059
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-