Grizz
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2015
- 2,440
- 312
- 160
"
Despite suggestions by the President, various Senators, and
numerous commentators that the Senate has a constitutional
obligation to act on judicial nominations, the text of the Constitution
contains no such obligation."
Moreover, the suggestion
that the obligation is implicit in the Advice and Consent Clause
does not appear to comport with the Framers’ understanding
of the term."
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No1_White.pdf
Let's see Harvard Law professor , or you and Faun.....
Despite suggestions by the President, various Senators, and
numerous commentators that the Senate has a constitutional
obligation to act on judicial nominations, the text of the Constitution
contains no such obligation."
Moreover, the suggestion
that the obligation is implicit in the Advice and Consent Clause
does not appear to comport with the Framers’ understanding
of the term."
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No1_White.pdf
Let's see Harvard Law professor , or you and Faun.....