Body Language & Crisis Actor Theory & American Politics

who knows. Are you?

I think the argument that anti-depressants cause mass shootings is suspect. Who do they put on anti-depressants?
There hasn't been a mass shooter that wasn't on them, or just taken off of them.



Seems like quite a claim. Name every mass shooter and the meds they were on.


I'm not doing that for you b/c you are lazy. ON top of that, half the time, that information is kept under wraps. HIPPA laws and all.

Trust me on this, it is how the MK-Ultra spooks operate. Once these poor patsies come fully off of this shit, they can't believe what they have done.


Not sure if you caught how you contradicted yourself, take your time and get back to me.

Those laws only apply to the living. . .
 
I'd like this to stay in politics because it is politics. You'll note I'm not confirming one way or the other. Just noting that conspiracy theories can affect politics.

Crisis actors, deep state, false flag: the rise of conspiracy theory code words

It’s no coincidence that the cottage industry of false flag allegations has grown in tandem with the mass uptake of social media – theories are absorbed and spread rapidly online by a range of groups. Conspiracy broadcasters have large, international audiences, and some polling suggests that up to half of Americans believe in at least some signature conspiracy theories.

I'd say that if you watch some type of media in question, a sure sign of authenticity would have to render down at the end of the day to paying very close attention to body language in the context of the horrific event + the known stages of the grief cycle. Bearing in mind that even while in the "shock/denial" phase of grief, a hallow and desperate look can still be seen in the eyes and the lines around the mouth.

If you freeze frame this boy and his friends/fellow survivors' pictures in the beginning, does it look like a group of kids who just survived a mass shooting at their school? Many years ago there was a mass shooting at a school in the city I grew up in. It was a huge school. They interviewed some of the students just after and they were visibly shaken, the girls crying in hysterics, tear streaked faces, clear expressions of fear and grief. The boys were also wiping tears away, faces torn, fist shoved deep in their pockets, hollow grief around their eyes.

I'm not quite seeing that here vv But maybe that's just a result of society becoming numb to this?



I get it. If a party can be made to look bad (guns = republicans), horrifically bad, then the scare-votes from the middle go to the opposing party. I understand the theory. But if it turns out that something was staged, it would play against the staging party, also horrifically.

On the one hand, using a locale to stage a fake crises to fuel certain political sentiments (usually against a party), seems a bit out there. Just the sheer logistics of securing a location, gagging potential outlying witnesses, etc. On the other hand, a friend pointed out to me how calm, unruffled and rehearsed certain interviewees are in weeks following a brutal and devastating event such as the recent school shooting. He said that sometimes they even seem to forget they're supposed to look devastated and then do their best "devastated" face for the camera...then forget...then remember...then forget. I watched one of these interviews and I must say, he has a point.

But still, all that effort to stage a crisis? I don't know. But if you control the media...? I remember a man who lost a son years and years ago. To this day the devastation of that loss still shows in lines all around his face. An animated man with a bounce in his step has turned to a shuffling stone-faced monument to grief. Is this body language missing?

If you freeze frame this boy and his friends/fellow survivors' pictures in the beginning, does it look like a group of kids who just survived a mass shooting at their school?
Seriously!!! You depraved f*cking waste of skin!!!

How dare you use an interview several days after the fact to cry foul about those kids' truth!?! While the matter may be "just politics" to you; it is not at all nor was it "just politics" to them. How dare you!!!

You want " visibly shaken, [kids] crying in hysterics, tear streaked faces, clear expressions of fear and grief?" Click on this goddamned sentence, you lousy motherf*cking piece of fetid detritus! [Warning: Very disturbing content will be found at the linked webpage.]

That's what that child lived through and you have the audacity to dare cast as a charade the fortitude of that boy and that of others who survived the M. Stoneman Douglas shooting! You need to crawl the f*ck back under the rock from which you came!
 
While I have a problem with censorship, some of the more idiotic videos should be taken down once it is determined to be simply paranoid freaks posting them. There should be at least some truth to them. Most are just blatant outright lies.

IOW. . . . you have no problem censoring folks you think need censoring. :abgg2q.jpg:
I have zero problem with censoring nutcases. They tend to agitate and create more nutcases. These nutcases then tend to blow up government buildings or conduct mass shootings.
Sure they do. If you believe the MSM.
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report
Easy. I saw a picture on his instagram account of him in a MAGA hat. What does that have to do with MSN?

nikolascruzmakarov.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have zero problem with censoring nutcases. They tend to agitate and create more nutcases. These nutcases then tend to blow up government buildings or conduct mass shootings.
Sure they do. If you believe the MSM.
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report

I believe he was wearing a Trump hat in his own media.

Yeah, I went to a few sites and they tell me it was his Instagram account. Sure enough. Whatever.

Even if it is true, I'm not sure what it means to have a crazy person, or a patsy that is implicated wearing partisan clothing. This is part of the Shadow government's war, clearly.

I don't think we will get any truth from the MSM or the corporations.

Even if he was wearing, "I'm with Her" clothing, I still wouldn't think it made a lick of difference in the end.

Right, before you were claiming he was a socialist as if that meant something. Now that you see he was wearing a Trump hat it's impossible to discern his political views. Yeah, I don't think you're someone who should be blaming the media for anything.
 
IOW. . . . you have no problem censoring folks you think need censoring. :abgg2q.jpg:
I have zero problem with censoring nutcases. They tend to agitate and create more nutcases. These nutcases then tend to blow up government buildings or conduct mass shootings.
Sure they do. If you believe the MSM.
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report
Easy. I saw a picture on his instagram account of him in a MAGA hat. What does that have to do with MSN?

nikolascruzmakarov.jpg
Okay. But it is the MSM and corporate America that has told you this was his account.

If you want to believe the MSM that this is his verified real account, which he made on his own volition, you go ahead and believe them.

I suspend my credulity.

I remember who was involved in the slaying of MLK, Malcolm, Bobby and JFK, who was involved in framing up Peltier and Shakur. I'm aware of the controversies around Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC & the Boston bombing. . . the list goes on. I'm not just going to buy something b/c the corporate/government fascist state tells me that this is his account. It might be, it might not be. Let's wait till he has his day in court and he tells us what it all means.

If it is anything like the show trial and kangaroo court of Holmes, I think we'll have our answer.

I wonder what his parents did for a living . . . And why he was adopted.

I sense an agenda though.
 
I have zero problem with censoring nutcases. They tend to agitate and create more nutcases. These nutcases then tend to blow up government buildings or conduct mass shootings.
Sure they do. If you believe the MSM.
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report
Easy. I saw a picture on his instagram account of him in a MAGA hat. What does that have to do with MSN?

nikolascruzmakarov.jpg
Okay. But it is the MSM and corporate America that has told you this was his account.

If you want to believe the MSM that this is his verified real account, which he made on his own volition, you go ahead and believe them.

I suspend my credulity.

I remember who was involved in the slaying of MLK, Malcolm, Bobby and JFK, who was involved in framing up Peltier and Shakur. I'm aware of the controversies around Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC & the Boston bombing. . . the list goes on. I'm not just going to buy something b/c the corporate/government fascist state tells me that this is his account. It might be, it might not be. Let's wait till he has his day in court and he tells us what it all means.

If it is anything like the show trial and kangaroo court of Holmes, I think we'll have our answer.

I wonder what his parents did for a living . . . And why he was adopted.

I sense an agenda though.

Can I ask you why on earth you would think it wasn't his account?

His own fellow students said it was his account.
 
Sure they do. If you believe the MSM.
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report
Easy. I saw a picture on his instagram account of him in a MAGA hat. What does that have to do with MSN?

nikolascruzmakarov.jpg
Okay. But it is the MSM and corporate America that has told you this was his account.

If you want to believe the MSM that this is his verified real account, which he made on his own volition, you go ahead and believe them.

I suspend my credulity.

I remember who was involved in the slaying of MLK, Malcolm, Bobby and JFK, who was involved in framing up Peltier and Shakur. I'm aware of the controversies around Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC & the Boston bombing. . . the list goes on. I'm not just going to buy something b/c the corporate/government fascist state tells me that this is his account. It might be, it might not be. Let's wait till he has his day in court and he tells us what it all means.

If it is anything like the show trial and kangaroo court of Holmes, I think we'll have our answer.

I wonder what his parents did for a living . . . And why he was adopted.

I sense an agenda though.

Can I ask you why on earth you would think it wasn't his account?

His own fellow students said it was his account.

I'm not necessarily saying it was, or that it wasn't. I'm just a skeptic. If TPTB want to create a patsy, a stooge, this is the way they would create plausible motive, a way to make him look like your "taxi driver." A set up.

OTH, I don't really understand what difference the political affiliation of a troubled teen that wants to commit mass murder has to do with the price of tea in China. Unless you let it, which is the number one reason we should be suspect.

If this was just a troubled teen lashing out at bullying, it WOULDN'T be political, but it has been made political by the powers that be.


Plausibility.

If they are going to create a patsy, they need to make it believable.

OTH, I am not saying it was a phony account, but just b/c students he went to school with though it was real, doesn't mean they knew any better either. Anyone can make a fake account. Likewise, if his adopted parents were the intel agents in charge of this operation, and the account, that would make sense, would it not?

Most folks forget that Obama's grandparents and mother were CIA agents.

This shit tends to stay all in the family.
 
I've never watched MSM but I do know this last shooter was a Drumpf supporter.

Okay, you SAY you don't consume MSM, yet you turn around and tell us that he is a "Drumpf" supporter. I had also hear he was a socialist. Who the hell knows? How did you come by the information that he is a "Drumpf" supporter? This whole story is a media creation, it is the only way you COULD know about it. Your whole POV is dictated by them. I say, if it comes from the establishment, you can be pretty sure, there are lies somewhere in there.

malcolm-x-media-qoute.jpg


Liberal-FBI Love Fest Recalls 1950s | Black Agenda Report
Easy. I saw a picture on his instagram account of him in a MAGA hat. What does that have to do with MSN?

nikolascruzmakarov.jpg
Okay. But it is the MSM and corporate America that has told you this was his account.

If you want to believe the MSM that this is his verified real account, which he made on his own volition, you go ahead and believe them.

I suspend my credulity.

I remember who was involved in the slaying of MLK, Malcolm, Bobby and JFK, who was involved in framing up Peltier and Shakur. I'm aware of the controversies around Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC & the Boston bombing. . . the list goes on. I'm not just going to buy something b/c the corporate/government fascist state tells me that this is his account. It might be, it might not be. Let's wait till he has his day in court and he tells us what it all means.

If it is anything like the show trial and kangaroo court of Holmes, I think we'll have our answer.

I wonder what his parents did for a living . . . And why he was adopted.

I sense an agenda though.

Can I ask you why on earth you would think it wasn't his account?

His own fellow students said it was his account.

I'm not necessarily saying it was, or that it wasn't. I'm just a skeptic. If TPTB want to create a patsy, a stooge, this is the way they would create plausible motive, a way to make him look like your "taxi driver." A set up.

OTH, I don't really understand what difference the political affiliation of a troubled teen that wants to commit mass murder has to do with the price of tea in China. Unless you let it, which is the number one reason we should be suspect.

If this was just a troubled teen lashing out at bullying, it WOULDN'T be political, but it has been made political by the powers that be.


Plausibility.

If they are going to create a patsy, they need to make it believable.

OTH, I am not saying it was a phony account, but just b/c students he went to school with though it was real, doesn't mean they knew any better either. Anyone can make a fake account. Likewise, if his adopted parents were the intel agents in charge of this operation, and the account, that would make sense, would it not?

Most folks forget that Obama's grandparents and mother were CIA agents.

This shit tends to stay all in the family.
Youre pretending the figure head in charge doesnt have an emotional impact on people. His (Drumpf) views are being celebrated by the KKK and other hate groups. This kid was already unstable. Pretty good bet that Drumpf had some influence on his decision to kill 17 people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top