emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
I was debating on hazlnut's thread,.
comparing complaints of
* "Alt-Right LINGO" online as threats to American freedom and public by pushing "All-White" propaganda
vs.
* BINDING LAWS AND RULINGS biased by left-wing political beliefs
that have PENALIZED ALL CITIZENS and DEPRIVED ALL AMERICANS of free choice and civil liberties
without due process to prove which people have committed any violations, if any
(I cited the ACA mandates that deprived citizens of free choice how to pay and provide for health care,
and court ruling "establishing" BELIEF in right to marriage, as well as related lawsuits and penalties
against businesses and individuals, whose beliefs about traditional marriage or about transgender orientation and bathroom policies that are outside govt jurisdiction to "force them to change" under threat of punishment)
Which do you believe is more of a threat to American citizens and public
* Alt-Right LINGO online and free speech to promote political agenda online, even if it is biased as racist
* legally BINDING laws and rulings through govt pushing biased leftwing beliefs onto the public,
at a loss of liberty and fines against people of different beliefs deemed "homophobic and bigoted"
I argue in response to hazlnut that the LEFTWING labels of homophobe and bigot
have led to COURT RULINGS and LEGISLATION that has DEPRIVED and PUNISHED
citizens of different beliefs,
and this causes more harm that the threat to people like her of different beliefs
she blames on "LINGO" online that is part of freedom of speech, and does not create legally binding
policy imposed on ALL AMERICANS as the mandates and rulings pushed through govt by Leftwing agenda.
@haznut can you explain how "lingo online" that is BIASED but nonbinding free speech
is more of a threat than the damages caused by
BIASED LAWS AND RULINGS THAT ARE BINDING ON ALL AMERICANS.
comparing complaints of
* "Alt-Right LINGO" online as threats to American freedom and public by pushing "All-White" propaganda
vs.
* BINDING LAWS AND RULINGS biased by left-wing political beliefs
that have PENALIZED ALL CITIZENS and DEPRIVED ALL AMERICANS of free choice and civil liberties
without due process to prove which people have committed any violations, if any
(I cited the ACA mandates that deprived citizens of free choice how to pay and provide for health care,
and court ruling "establishing" BELIEF in right to marriage, as well as related lawsuits and penalties
against businesses and individuals, whose beliefs about traditional marriage or about transgender orientation and bathroom policies that are outside govt jurisdiction to "force them to change" under threat of punishment)
Which do you believe is more of a threat to American citizens and public
* Alt-Right LINGO online and free speech to promote political agenda online, even if it is biased as racist
* legally BINDING laws and rulings through govt pushing biased leftwing beliefs onto the public,
at a loss of liberty and fines against people of different beliefs deemed "homophobic and bigoted"
I argue in response to hazlnut that the LEFTWING labels of homophobe and bigot
have led to COURT RULINGS and LEGISLATION that has DEPRIVED and PUNISHED
citizens of different beliefs,
and this causes more harm that the threat to people like her of different beliefs
she blames on "LINGO" online that is part of freedom of speech, and does not create legally binding
policy imposed on ALL AMERICANS as the mandates and rulings pushed through govt by Leftwing agenda.
@haznut can you explain how "lingo online" that is BIASED but nonbinding free speech
is more of a threat than the damages caused by
BIASED LAWS AND RULINGS THAT ARE BINDING ON ALL AMERICANS.