NOT if it is John Solomon... he's become very biased.... but it's opinion rights, I suppose?Your source is not trustworthy.the prosecutor was CORRUPT and not going after the corruption the new president was hired for....True! Why is that "if" there? That's Politifact's attempt at a fig leaf. Please read the details provided by Joe below...
Joe Biden's 2020 Ukrainian nightmare: A closed probe is revived
"In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat."
I don't see anything that warrants an "if"..
the prosecutor's deputy prosecutors were found with piles of diamonds and gold in their homes, from all the payoffs the elite running the corrupt businesses were paying them to not prosecute them.....
All of our allies were in support of the US's actions of with holding help, until the new president fired the crooked prosecutor.
It was not hidden, their goal was known by all in our government and all in other EU gvts like the UK.
It had nothing to do with his son being a board member for an Oligarch's company there.
And it was done in the best interest of the Ukraine to rid them of the overwhelming corruption the prosecutor was a part of, and theft of their citizens, and the UK, and the USA...who were funding the repair of the Ukraine with diplomatic funds and were concerned with our USA money just ending up in corrupt hands.
The quid pro quo, was a diplomatic one, which happens all the time in Diplomacy, was in the interest of the USA... not for personal or political gain, of themselves
A Republican Conspiracy Theory About a Biden-in-Ukraine Scandal Has Gone Mainstream. But It Is Not True.
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailTumblrRedditLinkedInFlipboardGoogle Bookmarks
Share
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate The Intercept progressive Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left
As opposed to the link in the OP
the Gateway Pundit
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check
Yep, if all else fails, the last resort is to demean the messenger.
Pundit is FAKE News. However, Frank did link to the Hill article which is fact based.
By John Solomon — 04/01/19 09:37 PM EDT 1,770
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
Last edited: