well if they are canned and replaced they didn’t really deserve it now did theyYou're a cocksucker. Why do you have a problem with people making what they deserve?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well if they are canned and replaced they didn’t really deserve it now did theyYou're a cocksucker. Why do you have a problem with people making what they deserve?
It's amazing how you right wing idiots' illogical minds "work".well if they are canned and replaced they didn’t really deserve it now did they
what part of that is illogical? if they deserved it, they’d still be there. They didn’t…they rejected the 3 percent raise as well.It's amazing how you right wing idiots' illogical minds "work".
You're assuming because their employer isnt paying them what they are asking that they dont deserve it. That is illogical.what part of that is illogical? if they deserved it, they’d still be there. They didn’t…they rejected the 3 percent raise as well.
see ya later.
nah it’s completely logical. If they think they deserve more apply for another job. To the other party, at the current job, they don’t deserve what they are askingYou're assuming because their employer isnt paying them what they are asking that they dont deserve it. That is illogical.
But I know already you'll come back and say, "well, that's how capitalism works". But you see that's why we have unions. Because if it were up to corps, there would be no minimum wage and 7 day work weeks. Unbridled capitalism has and never will work without checks ie things like unions.
A 3% raise means they'll be getting a pay decrease if you take inflation into account.
So your assumption is the corporation is always right. Why is that?nah it’s completely logical. If they think they deserve more apply for another job. To the other party, at the current job, they don’t deserve what they are asking
Go find someone else that is willing to pay what you think you deserve. A wage is based on a contract, an agreement, which takes two or more people agreeing.
not at all…they were wrong, hence why they offered more…but the union bosses rejected itSo your assumption is the corporation is always right. Why is that?
Between 2018-2019 Kellogg's authorized a $1,500,000,000 stock buyback. THAT is why people arent getting paid what they deserve.
Not at all…hence why they offered a 3 percent wage increase that the union bosses rejectedSo your assumption is the corporation is always right. Why is that?
Between 2018-2019 Kellogg's authorized a $1,500,000,000 stock buyback. THAT is why people arent getting paid what they deserve.
You can live off your 401k and pension during your working years you dumb piece of shit? Are you saying that not even SOME of that $1.5 billion could have been used to pay it's employees more?not at all…they were wrong, hence why they offered more…but the union bosses rejected it
Not at all…hence why they offered a 3 percent wage increase that the union bosses rejected
wow a stock buy back? you mean the thousands of investors…including peoples 401ks, pensions…maybe even then unions own pension….for a return on their investment!?! the horror…
sure hence why they offered a 3 percent wage increase…and not every investment is a pension or 401k…some investors might just have their money invested in it.You can live off your 401k and pension during your working years you dumb piece of shit? Are you saying that not even SOME of that $1.5 billion could have been used to pay it's employees more?
If a corporation really wanted to reward typical investors it would pay (more in) dividends instead of just temporarily bumping up the share price by buying back its stock.wow a stock buy back? you mean the thousands of investors…including peoples 401ks, pensions…maybe even then unions own pension….for a return on their investment!?! the horror…
The dividend yield on Kellogg stock as of 11/30/21 was 3.8%. Which is more than the pay raise employees were offered.sure hence why they offered a 3 percent wage increase…and not every investment is a pension or 401k…some investors might just have their money invested in it.
don’t you think it’s right to pay the people that have also put their money into the company? don’t they deserve a little return as well?
true but they can’t always pay dividends it’s much easier this wayIf a corporation really wanted to reward typical investors it would pay dividends instead of just temporarily bumping up the share price by buying back its stock.
Do Share Buybacks Really Destroy Long-Term Value?
Read our latest post from Alex Edmans (London Business School).corpgov.law.harvard.edu
Kellogg does pay a dividend. Yes I agree that $1.5 billion basically went down the toilet or to hedge fund managers who cashed in on the buyback with the share price increase.If a corporation really wanted to reward typical investors it would pay dividends instead of just temporarily bumping up the share price by buying back its stock.
Do Share Buybacks Really Destroy Long-Term Value?
Read our latest post from Alex Edmans (London Business School).corpgov.law.harvard.edu
Tell us the last time Kellogg missed a dividend payment. I'll clue you in...they havent.true but they can’t always pay dividends it’s much easier this way
.8 more…not much…without investors there is no companyThe dividend yield on Kellogg stock as of 11/30/21 was 3.8%. Which is more than the pay raise employees were offered.
And like I said, 3% doesnt even keep up with inflation, so that doesnt even keep up with inflation nor does it account for past underpayment.
hahah no hedge fund managers didn’t simply get the 1.5 are you an idiot?Kellogg does pay a dividend. Yes I agree that $1.5 billion basically went down the toilet or to hedge fund managers who cashed in on the buyback with the share price increase.
Explain why the CEO's compensation increased over 20% from 2019 to 2020 to over $11,000,000..8 more…not much…without investors there is no company
that 3 percent doesn’t include the additionally benefits offered as well…more over the 3 percent was not one time. like the yield.
they were making our way better
face it though…their union bosses got greedy…snd cost a lot of people their jobs potentially
unions are a good thing
Kellogg's strike: Workers must get our support
I will be in Battle Creek, Michigan this Friday with workers who have been on strike for over two months against Kellogg’s. Let me tell you why I’m going.www.foxnews.com
he was paid largely in stock options. He’s pay was/is based largely on how well a job he doesExplain why the CEO's compensation increased over 20% from 2019 to 2020 to over $11,000,000.
Hedge fund managers? They undoubtedly have the technological edge, but it's more a matter of legalized insider trading, imo. Those making the buyback decisions typically serve on multiple corporate boards, paying each other stock bonuses magically just in time to cash in on those stock buybacks and suck the wind right back out of them again.Kellogg does pay a dividend. Yes I agree that $1.5 billion basically went down the toilet or to hedge fund managers who cashed in on the buyback with the share price increase.