Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What did the Mueller report say? Just what has Trump done to benefit Russia? Anything?
I'd actually hard to believe that anyone out there still believes the "Trump/Russia collusion" hoax. You people were hornswaggled, big time, and you took the bait hook, line, and sinker.
Whether or not Trump benefitted Russia was not germane to the boundaries and purpose of the Mueller Investigation.
You should probably read it sometime -
Although few of you have the reading comprehension and attention span to go beyond the 4 page Billy Barr summary.
Ok then. Disregarding the Mueller investigation, just how did Trump conspire with the Russian to "steal" the 2016 election?
And just what concessions or benefits did they receive in return? And if they did receive something in return, what are we giving them today?
Clearly, you are not paying attention - NOR do you or I have the time to wade through the mountain of evidence including over 150 contacts between Trump campaign people and Russia in the run-up to election in 2016 (ALL of which were LIED about)
So some people had business dealings with Russia and some were caught up in a perjury trap. Is it illegal to conduct business with Russia?
Just what "mountain of evidence" are you referring to? Did the Mueller report convict Trump of any wrongdoing? If so, why wasn't that included in the impeachment trial? I don't remember hearing the word "Russia" throughout that entire shitshow, do you?
I'm not interested in what some wordy report says. I want it straight from your mouth: Exactly how did Donald Trump conspire with the Russians to "steal" the election, to influence the voters, or to otherwise benefit Putin, the Russian government, or the country of Russia?
Has Trump done anything to benefit them militarily, economically, socially, what?
Another one who isn't paying a bit of attention ^ Sad
Looks more like the fake news is back and has already hooked its first succor fishWell, little wonder that Putin and his trolls are rooting for him!
Facebook 2020: Russian trolls are back to meddle with the coming US election - CNN
Whether or not Trump benefitted Russia was not germane to the boundaries and purpose of the Mueller Investigation.
You should probably read it sometime -
Although few of you have the reading comprehension and attention span to go beyond the 4 page Billy Barr summary.
Ok then. Disregarding the Mueller investigation, just how did Trump conspire with the Russian to "steal" the 2016 election?
And just what concessions or benefits did they receive in return? And if they did receive something in return, what are we giving them today?
Clearly, you are not paying attention - NOR do you or I have the time to wade through the mountain of evidence including over 150 contacts between Trump campaign people and Russia in the run-up to election in 2016 (ALL of which were LIED about)
So some people had business dealings with Russia and some were caught up in a perjury trap. Is it illegal to conduct business with Russia?
Just what "mountain of evidence" are you referring to? Did the Mueller report convict Trump of any wrongdoing? If so, why wasn't that included in the impeachment trial? I don't remember hearing the word "Russia" throughout that entire shitshow, do you?
I'm not interested in what some wordy report says. I want it straight from your mouth: Exactly how did Donald Trump conspire with the Russians to "steal" the election, to influence the voters, or to otherwise benefit Putin, the Russian government, or the country of Russia?
Has Trump done anything to benefit them militarily, economically, socially, what?
Another one who isn't paying a bit of attention ^ Sad
Paying attention to what? A bunch of Crayola and Tide Pod-eating wacko leftist conspiracy theorists, howling like monkeys over some imaginary link between Trump and Russia?
Tell me, why should I even give you zipperheads ten milliseconds of my attention? To be honest, I did try to understand your point of view but the more I listened, the more I could feel my IQ dropping by the second.
I am reminded of an old adage about a hesitant cat, which is caught motionless because it wants to leap forward but doesn't quite dare. The Democrats are that cat, now. Do they risk springing forward with Sanders, who has boiling enthusiasm on his side, and try to present him as a suitable president? Or, do they keep holding back, denying him wholehearted support in the hope that someone else will get the nomination. If they do that, they risk merely weakening his chances of success and commensurately boosting those of Trump.
Well, little wonder that Putin and his trolls are rooting for him!
Facebook 2020: Russian trolls are back to meddle with the coming US election - CNN
If you look at policies and not personalities, the Dem Left (Sanders and Warren) got about 45% in Iowa and 36% in NH. I suspect if it comes down to a single Leftist vs a single Moderate, Bernie will lose. He couldn't even beat Hillary last time.I am reminded of an old adage about a hesitant cat, which is caught motionless because it wants to leap forward but doesn't quite dare. The Democrats are that cat, now. Do they risk springing forward with Sanders, who has boiling enthusiasm on his side, and try to present him as a suitable president? Or, do they keep holding back, denying him wholehearted support in the hope that someone else will get the nomination. If they do that, they risk merely weakening his chances of success and commensurately boosting those of Trump.
"Do they risk springing forward with Sanders, ..."
I don't believe you are structuring that correctly.
What choice do they have?
At this point, .....it's the Marxist.
That's Karma.....they've been pushing communism since the 32nd President, Stalin's BFF.
If you look at policies and not personalities, the Dem Left (Sanders and Warren) got about 45% in Iowa and 36% in NH. I suspect if it comes down to a single Leftist vs a single Moderate, Bernie will lose. He couldn't even beat Hillary last time.I am reminded of an old adage about a hesitant cat, which is caught motionless because it wants to leap forward but doesn't quite dare. The Democrats are that cat, now. Do they risk springing forward with Sanders, who has boiling enthusiasm on his side, and try to present him as a suitable president? Or, do they keep holding back, denying him wholehearted support in the hope that someone else will get the nomination. If they do that, they risk merely weakening his chances of success and commensurately boosting those of Trump.
"Do they risk springing forward with Sanders, ..."
I don't believe you are structuring that correctly.
What choice do they have?
At this point, .....it's the Marxist.
That's Karma.....they've been pushing communism since the 32nd President, Stalin's BFF.
Sorry, none of the three are the same.Bernie's policies are the same as the CPUSA, and the current Democrat Party.
The DNC will have no choice but to support him if he wins the nomination.
Sorry, none of the three are the same.Bernie's policies are the same as the CPUSA, and the current Democrat Party.
“Where has socialism ever worked?” Scandinavia seems very happy with their socialism.
“Where has socialism ever worked?” Scandinavia seems very happy with their socialism.
If Bernie is a Socialist, Denmark is not socialist, and Venezuela is socialist, there must by policies that Bernie supports that are not found in Denmark but are found in Venezuela. I look forward to your list.Sorry, none of the three are the same.Bernie's policies are the same as the CPUSA, and the current Democrat Party.
“Where has socialism ever worked?” Scandinavia seems very happy with their socialism.
This is the problem with you government school grads....you prove what the greatest President in the last hundred years said:
'It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.'
In other words, being a moron is your problem.
“Speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen told students that he had “absolutely no wish to interfere the presidential debate in the US” but nonetheless attempted to set the record straight about his country.
"I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy,” Rasmussen said.
The PM’s comments come after US presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton used part of the first Democratic debate to discuss how the United States could emulate Scandinavia.” Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
"For many on the left, the answer to the last question is “the Scandinavian countries.” The problem, however, is that the Scandinavian countries have, by some measures, freer markets than the US, which the left sees as the archetype of capitalism. At the very least, they are not significantly different from the US in their degree of economic freedom.
Abolishing markets does not describe the Scandinavian countries, though it does capture a lot of what was going on in Venezuela. Socialism, at least historically, did not simply mean “a large welfare state” as we see in Scandinavia. In fact, the only way countries can afford larger welfare states is to have economies productive enough to produce the wealth that can be taxed away to support such programs. This is why the Scandinavian countries deregulated (and lowered tax rates) so much in the last decade or two: only through freer markets could they afford their transfer programs.
If you love the Scandinavian model, you don’t love socialism. You love market capitalism, because that’s what makes that model possible. (Whether large welfare states are necessary or desirable is a matter for another column.)
You Can't Deny that Venezuela is a Socialist Calamity | Steven Horwitz
Ready to admit how truly dumb you are????
If Bernie is a Socialist, Denmark is not socialist, and Venezuela is socialist, there must by policies that Bernie supports that are not found in Denmark but are found in Venezuela. I look forward to your list.Sorry, none of the three are the same.Bernie's policies are the same as the CPUSA, and the current Democrat Party.
“Where has socialism ever worked?” Scandinavia seems very happy with their socialism.
This is the problem with you government school grads....you prove what the greatest President in the last hundred years said:
'It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.'
In other words, being a moron is your problem.
“Speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen told students that he had “absolutely no wish to interfere the presidential debate in the US” but nonetheless attempted to set the record straight about his country.
"I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy,” Rasmussen said.
The PM’s comments come after US presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton used part of the first Democratic debate to discuss how the United States could emulate Scandinavia.” Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
"For many on the left, the answer to the last question is “the Scandinavian countries.” The problem, however, is that the Scandinavian countries have, by some measures, freer markets than the US, which the left sees as the archetype of capitalism. At the very least, they are not significantly different from the US in their degree of economic freedom.
Abolishing markets does not describe the Scandinavian countries, though it does capture a lot of what was going on in Venezuela. Socialism, at least historically, did not simply mean “a large welfare state” as we see in Scandinavia. In fact, the only way countries can afford larger welfare states is to have economies productive enough to produce the wealth that can be taxed away to support such programs. This is why the Scandinavian countries deregulated (and lowered tax rates) so much in the last decade or two: only through freer markets could they afford their transfer programs.
If you love the Scandinavian model, you don’t love socialism. You love market capitalism, because that’s what makes that model possible. (Whether large welfare states are necessary or desirable is a matter for another column.)
You Can't Deny that Venezuela is a Socialist Calamity | Steven Horwitz
Ready to admit how truly dumb you are????
Sounds horrible, private health insurance, drug companies, “big banks”, and the energy industry are some of our most cherished institutions. I'm sure no real American would want “free” college tuition, a “living wage” or guaranteed home ownership.8."Today, Sanders wants to bring what he admired in the USSR, Cuba, Nicaragua and other communist states to America.
For starters, he proposes completely nationalizing our health care system and putting private health insurance and drug companies “out of business.” He also wants to break up “big banks” and control the energy industry, while providing “free” college tuition, a “living wage” and guaranteed homeownership and jobs through massive public works projects.
Sounds horrible, private health insurance, drug companies, “big banks”, and the energy industry are some of our most cherished institutions. I'm sure no real American would want “free” college tuition, a “living wage” or guaranteed home ownership.8."Today, Sanders wants to bring what he admired in the USSR, Cuba, Nicaragua and other communist states to America.
For starters, he proposes completely nationalizing our health care system and putting private health insurance and drug companies “out of business.” He also wants to break up “big banks” and control the energy industry, while providing “free” college tuition, a “living wage” and guaranteed homeownership and jobs through massive public works projects.
Which of these polices are not found in the Scandinavian countries?
You had to go back pretty far to smear Sanders. I guess by your measure Trump is a pro-choice Democrat who would invite the Clintons to his wedding.
Ryan is right about the effect Bernie Sanders would have on the democrat party. It would devastate them...heh heh heh.Did you think I was posting in support of Bernie?????
CNN. You might as well cite Mad Magazine or The Onion. The rent is coming due on your fool's paradise.Well, little wonder that Putin and his trolls are rooting for him!
Facebook 2020: Russian trolls are back to meddle with the coming US election - CNN
Ryan is right about the effect Bernie Sanders would have on the democrat party. It would devastate them...heh heh heh.Did you think I was posting in support of Bernie?????
That's so sad but that's what happens when your party has been a covert socialist safe space for decades.
Am I right, Comrade Obama?
However if he thinks train wreck combined with dumpster fire candidate Joe Biden will save them he is smoking crack! Or something like it.
The democrats have already made their bed so they had better get used to the idea of sleeping in it! The question now is how do they pull it together for 2024 after courting socialists for decades and running all the moderates out of the party
for at least that long too?
I don't think the party of Pelosi, Schumer and Schiff is capable of turning that train around. We may be looking at the beginning of the end for the democrats and remember how just a few years ago goofballs like Gavin Newsom
and Andrew Cuomo were seriously discussing the end of the republican party?
The hubris, their hate, their smug narcissism have not served the democrat party well at all. They are in for a massive ass kicking in a few months.