ScreamingEagle
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2004
- 13,399
- 1,707
- 245
There is nothing whatsoever in the Constitution that in any way endorses, authorizes, condones, or protects armed opposition to the government,
so the 2nd amendment can't possibly be in place for what you describe.
so you just believe guns are mentioned in the Constitution in order to protect hunters.....?
I believe what I said. Prove me wrong. Prove that there is an constitutional mandate for armed rebellion against the government.
sure you may believe what you want to believe.......so can i....