Bad News For Obama: Chattanooga attacks officially called 'terrorism'

Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

Yeah......because a terror attack is just bad news for President Obama.....

Well, it kinda belies his stance that he has terrorists on the run...
 
There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
That's a load of bullshit that you are simply bleating out like a good little sheeple.
 
Yeah......because a terror attack is just bad news for President Obama.....
When there are 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil, needlessly killing American citizens when at least half of them could have and should have ben stopped by this failed administration...Yeah, they ARE bad news for him.

Actually I think all terrorist attacks are bad news for all Americans.

In a perfect world, every terrorist attack would be stopped. However, arguably the best anti-terrorist government in the world- Israel- can't actually achieve that.

If you believe that Donald Trump- or Cruz or any of the other GOP candidates can actually prevent every terrorist attack in the United States....well I have some real estate I would like to interest you in- a fantastic deal with 100% return on investment within weeks.....
 
Yeah......because a terror attack is just bad news for President Obama.....
When there are 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil, needlessly killing American citizens when at least half of them could have and should have ben stopped by this failed administration...Yeah, they ARE bad news for him.

Actually I think all terrorist attacks are bad news for all Americans.

In a perfect world, every terrorist attack would be stopped. However, arguably the best anti-terrorist government in the world- Israel- can't actually achieve that.

If you believe that Donald Trump- or Cruz or any of the other GOP candidates can actually prevent every terrorist attack in the United States....well I have some real estate I would like to interest you in- a fantastic deal with 100% return on investment within weeks.....
Israel's pretty good at inspiring terrorists too. )-:
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.
 
squal.jpg
 
.There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
That's a load of bullshit that you are simply bleating out like a good little sheeple.
Trouble handling the truth, eh? When someone starts using words like "sheeple", I take that as a WIN!!! :2up:
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.

Tacit support. Exactly the kind you insist on accusing peaceful Muslims of.

Does an organization have to fund an act before it's terrrorism?

Who funded the Ft. Hood attack?
 
There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
Actually, that wasn't a "yarn", since it' s well documented that Saddam had chemical weapons (AKA Weapons of Mass Destruction), and used them, notably on the Kurds and Iranians...

And our troops found and destroyed many of his stockpiles that he didn't send to Syria for "safekeeping" ( also well documented)....

Maybe you will believe a few Democrats like Bill and Hillary, or Kerry, on that...
Democrat Quotes on WMD

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 
There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
Actually, that wasn't a "yarn", since it' s well documented that Saddam had chemical weapons (AKA Weapons of Mass Destruction), and used them, notably on the Kurds and Iranians...

And our troops found and destroyed many of his stockpiles that he didn't send to Syria for "safekeeping" ( also well documented)....

Maybe you will believe a few Democrats like Bill and Hillary, or Kerry, on that...
Democrat Quotes on WMD

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
See message #42.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.

Tacit support. Exactly the kind you insist on accusing peaceful Muslims of.

Does an organization have to fund an act before it's terrrorism?

Who funded the Ft. Hood attack?

The argument that the daesh scum aren't a threat because there are crazy people who aren't daesh who kill doesn't wash, sorry.

But it's typical of the intellectual dwarves of the left to pretend it's a real argument.
 
There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
Actually, that wasn't a "yarn", since it' s well documented that Saddam had chemical weapons (AKA Weapons of Mass Destruction), and used them, notably on the Kurds and Iranians...

And our troops found and destroyed many of his stockpiles that he didn't send to Syria for "safekeeping" ( also well documented)....

Maybe you will believe a few Democrats like Bill and Hillary, or Kerry, on that...
Democrat Quotes on WMD

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
See message #42.
Your assertion that Bill and Hillary, Kerry, and a lot of other Democrats with security clearances weren't smart enough to talk to the CIA, NSA, and military to get the FACTS???
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.

Tacit support. Exactly the kind you insist on accusing peaceful Muslims of.

Does an organization have to fund an act before it's terrrorism?

Who funded the Ft. Hood attack?

The argument that the daesh scum aren't a threat because there are crazy people who aren't daesh who kill doesn't wash, sorry.

But it's typical of the intellectual dwarves of the left to pretend it's a real argument.

Domestic terrorism based on rightwing political ideology exists.

Domestic terrorism based on Christian beliefs exists.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.

Tacit support. Exactly the kind you insist on accusing peaceful Muslims of.

Does an organization have to fund an act before it's terrrorism?

Who funded the Ft. Hood attack?

The argument that the daesh scum aren't a threat because there are crazy people who aren't daesh who kill doesn't wash, sorry.

But it's typical of the intellectual dwarves of the left to pretend it's a real argument.

Domestic terrorism based on rightwing political ideology exists.

Domestic terrorism based on Christian beliefs exists.
And domestic terrorism based on Liberal beliefs (and FUNDED by the Democrats) exists...

Just look at BLM and the string of cops that were MURDERED...
 
.There was no problem with the majority of Muslims when we invaded Afghanistan. The problems started when Bush spun a yarn about WMDs.
That's a load of bullshit that you are simply bleating out like a good little sheeple.
Trouble handling the truth, eh? When someone starts using words like "sheeple", I take that as a WIN!!! :2up:
Exactly you are a sheeple. You simply bleat what other sheeple have bleated too you, whether there is any facts or evidence supporting you whatsoever. You people make me sick.
 
Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says
LINK: Chattanooga shooting a 'terror attack,' FBI Director James Comey says

That officially makes it 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama...

This is PART of why the vast majority, as a recent poll shows, of Americans have no confidence in Obama regarding the fight against terrorism or in keeping Americans safe.

how is it "bad news", trollboy?

have you admitted yet that shooting up planned parenthood and killing abortion doctors is terrorism?

What organization funds it?
Please name the Christian leaders who praised the killers.

Tacit support. Exactly the kind you insist on accusing peaceful Muslims of.

Does an organization have to fund an act before it's terrrorism?

Who funded the Ft. Hood attack?

The argument that the daesh scum aren't a threat because there are crazy people who aren't daesh who kill doesn't wash, sorry.

But it's typical of the intellectual dwarves of the left to pretend it's a real argument.

Domestic terrorism based on rightwing political ideology exists.

Domestic terrorism based on Christian beliefs exists.

so what rightwing group is currently recruiting? What church leaders are supporting them? What charities collect money to support the cause? What is the cause? And please share with us the names of all the right wing terrorists who have killed for the same cause, under the same banner.

I don't know of any.

But I do know of the daesh, who are cutting a wide swath around the world, slaughtering innocents in the name of allah, kidnapping, raping, and enslaving women and children, torturing and killing decent people, gunning down school children. And it isn't a group of Baptists.
 
Yeah......because a terror attack is just bad news for President Obama.....
When there are 4 successful terrorist attacks on US soil, needlessly killing American citizens when at least half of them could have and should have ben stopped by this failed administration...Yeah, they ARE bad news for him.

Actually I think all terrorist attacks are bad news for all Americans.

In a perfect world, every terrorist attack would be stopped. However, arguably the best anti-terrorist government in the world- Israel- can't actually achieve that.

If you believe that Donald Trump- or Cruz or any of the other GOP candidates can actually prevent every terrorist attack in the United States....well I have some real estate I would like to interest you in- a fantastic deal with 100% return on investment within weeks.....
Israel's pretty good at inspiring terrorists too. )-:

Based on your logic, is it any surprise that the acts carried out by Islamic jihadis have not inspired anger against Islam? You people should stop taking your CAIR marching orders and blaming US, Israel, and climate change on the behavior of Islamo terrorists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top