Australia gets it wrong.

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by RetiredGySgt, Aug 26, 2009.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,973
    Thanks Received:
    6,010
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,467
  2. midcan5
    Online

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    10,897
    Thanks Received:
    2,381
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,418
    That actually sounds reasonable, groups tend to engage in group think and having an impartial judge makes sense to me.
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,973
    Thanks Received:
    6,010
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,467
    The Courts Martial system HAS independent Judges. Australia went from an Independent military court system to one beholding to the chain of command. THAT is why the Court threw it out.

    The way Courts martials work is through an independent Judicial branch in the Military. Usually called the Judge Advocate branch. Totally separate and beyond the control of other military commands and units. All the local commands can do is prefer the charges. They have no control over who the Judge or defense and prosecution will be. They have no control over the Lawyers and Judges at all. All they provide is the information and a pool for the Court to pick jurors from.
     

Share This Page