E
eric
Guest
ou drop bombs, you know that civilians will die, and that's not intentionally killing civilians?
What I just can not figure out is if you are naive or insane, please clarify.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ou drop bombs, you know that civilians will die, and that's not intentionally killing civilians?
Originally posted by Sir Evil
You are barking up the wrong tree with you B.S here spidey! This is your opinion! show some facts to support these bombs were dropped on cities purposely to kill civilians.
You will never need to hold my hand, unless you ask when getting up from being on your Knee's wise ass!
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
If you can ask the question without being a dickface, I'll answer it Mad Rambo.
Originally posted by Sir Evil
You are walking on some serious thin ice here spidey! slowdown with your namecalling!
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
OK, so you're telling me, we did not drop any bombs on Baghdad? You want me to furnish proof that we bombed Baghdad? What are you, nuts?
drop bombs, you know that civilians will die, and that's not intentionally killing civilians?
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
Evildoer, I'm growing a little tired of double standards. If you're going to call me out on name calling, fine, name calling isn't right, I admit it, but if you go back and look you'll see that Rambo called me "Tubashit", and I replied in kind with "dick face." If Rambo can agree to stop calling me names, I will do the same for him. I will assume Rambo agrees, and refrain from calling him names from now on, until it becomes clear he does not agree. Fair enough?
Originally posted by OCA
You've lied by saying we've purposely killed civilians. Bombing a town where the insurgents shamelessly hide behind the civilians is not intentionally killing civilians. What is it about war that you don't understand? I'm still waiting for that irrefutable evidence also>
Originally posted by Sir Evil
Difference here at the moment is he is an established member that generally will present facts to his argument! You on the other hand are working on your second day here and already you are running around calling people traitor's and you know what else! Double standard? you are right! Paulie stop, dont, please leave him be!
civilans are intentionally placed in the way of bombs
Originally posted by OCA
You support a couple of guys who like to do each other in the dirt road getting hitched? I'm sorry I call vile behavior vile names, just me I guess.
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
I'm not the one who doesn't understand war. You apparently believe the only way dropping bombs on densely populated urbans areas can kill innocent civilians is if the civilans are intentionally placed in the way of bombs. As if nobody lived in Baghdad before we decided to bomb it, as if all the people in Baghdad were transported there immediately before the war just in time for our bombs to drop. And I'm the one who's crazy, sure, right, whatever Rambo.
I have already provided the evidence. Either you don't believe we bombed Baghdad or you believe that intentionally comitting acts which are known to result in civilian deaths is not intentionally killing civilians. Which is it?
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
If they want to, sure why not, that's not my problem. I support the rights of people like you to get married, and that could have far worse consequences as you might end up passing on your genes.
That's a nice image you have there of gays having sex on a dirt road. Did you come up with that all yourself? What kind of perverted thought sequence led to it exactly? You are straight, aren't you?
Originally posted by Sir Evil
Difference here at the moment is he is an established member that generally will present facts to his argument! You on the other hand are working on your second day here and already you are running around calling people traitor's and you know what else! Double standard? you are right! Paulie stop, dont, please leave him be!
Originally posted by OCA
Do you know what the terms legitimate target and collateral damage mean? I reiterate do you think that war is like a game you play on PSII? Dude your really starting to be on the fringe of reality, come join the rest of us in the light.
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
So esatblished members are allowed to call people ugly names, and new members are not? OK, I just wanted to get the rules straight, thanks.
Originally posted by SpidermanTuba
If it were like a game I play on whatver, I could drop all the bombs I wanted to and no one would get hurt. That's a pretty big difference and if you don't see it it's not my fault.
The term "legitimate target" means a target for which the one doing the targeting can justify the targeting of.
The term "collateral damage" refers to the civilians that are inevitably slaughtered and maimed and when you drop large quantities of explosives on populated areas.