Are You Watching?

CrazedScotsman

VIP Member
Jul 1, 2012
980
263
80
We are witness to the end of the Democrat Party!

Can you see the desperation?
The anger that they are about to become irrelevant?

I thought the Democrat Party was over after Bill Clinton beat George Bush but he surprised us all and flew to the Right after the Republicans destroyed Democrats in 1994.

But since Obama, Democrats went for total Socialism with little pushback from Republicans yet there was some and Democrats have been trying to get total Socialism since 2008.

Then there was the election of Trump and you started to see the panic that night. All the crying when the call was made that Trump had won the election. You would think Democrats would have taken the hint but nope, they doubled down on the double down. It is at this point that the silent Republicans started to grow a backbone and are coming out to stop this Socialism takeover of our country.

It is enjoyable watching though.

Just remember to vote this November and remember to VOTE REPUBLICAN!
 
Fascist Dems/Fake Media have lost all credibility... they're just jokes now..
.
.
1554344_1452919481631822_6629470587463496727_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's the thing ... they'll never die. They will eventually be back in power. Even the Cubs win a season or two.

I think P.J. O'Rourke said it best when he compared Republicans to G-d and Democrats to Santa Claus (Parliament of Whores 1991).

Santa is giving, Santa is always nice, Santa knows who is naughty or nice but really doesn't discriminate. Santa is preferable to G-d in every way except one.

Santa Claus doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:
But since Obama, Democrats went for total Socialism with little pushback from Republicans yet there was some and Democrats have been trying to get total Socialism since 2008.
They went hard left during the Dubya Bush regime...The neocons are already progressive AF and Chimpy McShrub was all too willing to let the moonbats walk all over him.....You couldn't tell his regime from that of LBJ.
 
At the end of the day, we want our government to trade hands every few years. If any one party were in power for very long, they might actually do something and that would be devastating for everyone.
 
I'm leaning Democrat. I'm convinced that the only way these parties will pay any attention at all to deficit spending is to put them at each other's throats. With one in control of the House while the other occupies the Presidency.
 
trump.gif


.I agree with Trump in regards to liberal fascists, fake media, anti-Americanism, the war on tiny humans and the globalists.
.
 
I'm leaning Democrat. I'm convinced that the only way these parties will pay any attention at all to deficit spending is to put them at each other's throats.

The parties have been at each other's throats for 242 years, 2 months, and 29 days. This whole time they've been fighting to see who can spend the most money.
 
We are witness to the end of the Democrat Party!

Can you see the desperation?
The anger that they are about to become irrelevant?

I thought the Democrat Party was over after Bill Clinton beat George Bush but he surprised us all and flew to the Right after the Republicans destroyed Democrats in 1994.

But since Obama, Democrats went for total Socialism with little pushback from Republicans yet there was some and Democrats have been trying to get total Socialism since 2008.

Then there was the election of Trump and you started to see the panic that night. All the crying when the call was made that Trump had won the election. You would think Democrats would have taken the hint but nope, they doubled down on the double down. It is at this point that the silent Republicans started to grow a backbone and are coming out to stop this Socialism takeover of our country.

It is enjoyable watching though.

Just remember to vote this November and remember to VOTE REPUBLICAN!

This is just a wild guess but ------------- you're brand new to the whole politics thing, amirite?
 
At the end of the day, we want our government to trade hands every few years. If any one party were in power for very long, they might actually do something and that would be devastating for everyone.

I'll support that in principle, but the Democrats have fallen off the cracker entirely. I want them nowhere.
 
At the end of the day, we want our government to trade hands every few years. If any one party were in power for very long, they might actually do something and that would be devastating for everyone.

I'll support that in principle, but the Democrats have fallen off the cracker entirely. I want them nowhere.

They'll have to jettison their most radical elements to get back in power. The radicals who were emboldened by eight years of Obama haven't realized, yet, that average Americans are tired of them.
 
I'm leaning Democrat. I'm convinced that the only way these parties will pay any attention at all to deficit spending is to put them at each other's throats.

The parties have been at each other's throats for 242 years, 2 months, and 29 days. This whole time they've been fighting to see who can spend the most money.

Neat trick since the current two parties have only existed for 164 years.

You must be one of Lumpy's calendar-averse people.
 
At the end of the day, we want our government to trade hands every few years. If any one party were in power for very long, they might actually do something and that would be devastating for everyone.

I'll support that in principle, but the Democrats have fallen off the cracker entirely. I want them nowhere.

They'll have to jettison their most radical elements to get back in power. The radicals who were emboldened by eight years of Obama haven't realized, yet, that average Americans are tired of them.

It remains to be seen if they can. I have my doubts.
 
I'm leaning Democrat. I'm convinced that the only way these parties will pay any attention at all to deficit spending is to put them at each other's throats.

The parties have been at each other's throats for 242 years, 2 months, and 29 days. This whole time they've been fighting to see who can spend the most money.

Neat trick since the current two parties have only existed for 164 years.

You must be one of Lumpy's calendar-averse people.

I was speaking of the two-party system, not necessarily their current incarnations. Poetic license.
 
I'm leaning Democrat. I'm convinced that the only way these parties will pay any attention at all to deficit spending is to put them at each other's throats.

The parties have been at each other's throats for 242 years, 2 months, and 29 days. This whole time they've been fighting to see who can spend the most money.

Neat trick since the current two parties have only existed for 164 years.

You must be one of Lumpy's calendar-averse people.

I was speaking of the two-party system, not necessarily their current incarnations. Poetic license.

Still holds. 242 years ago there were no parties at all. Then there were two, then there were several. We've had a continuous Duopoly with only minor bumps for effectively 150 years.

Still way too long but not 242.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top