Wehrwolfen
Senior Member
- May 22, 2012
- 2,750
- 340
- 48
Are we living in the Hunger Games?
Glenn Reynolds @ USA Today:
You know the story: While the provinces starve, the Capital City lives it up, its wheeler-dealer bigshots growing fat on the tribute extracted from the rest of the country.
We dont live in The Hunger Games yet, but Im not the first to notice that Washington, D.C., is doing a lot better than the rest of the country. Even in upscale parts of L.A. or New York, you see boarded up storefronts and other signs that the economy isnt what it used to be. But not so much in the Washington area, where housing prices are going up, fancy restaurants advertise $92 Wagyu steaks, and the Tysons Corner mall outshines as I can attest from firsthand experience even Beverly Hills famed Rodeo Drive.
Meanwhile, elsewhere, the contrast is even starker. As Adam Davidson recently wrote in The New York Times, riding the Amtrak between New York and D.C. exposes stark contrasts between the haves of the capital and the have-nots outside the Beltway. And he correctly assigns this to the importance of power.
Washington is rich not because it makes valuable things, but because it is powerful. With virtually everything subject to regulation, it pays to spend money influencing the regulators. As P.J. ORourke famously observed: When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators. But its not just bags-of-cash style corruption. Most of the D.C. boom is from lobbyists and PR people, and others who are retained to influence what the government does. Its a cold calculation: Youre likely to get a much better return from an investment of $1 million on lobbying than on a similar investment in, say, a new factory or better worker training.
So Washington gets fat, and it does so on money taken from the rest of the country: Either directly, in the form of taxes, or indirectly in the form of money that otherwise would have gone to that factory or training program.
Im not the only one to notice this, or even to make the Hunger Games analogy. As Ross Douthat wrote, There arent tributes from Michigan and New Mexico fighting to the death in Dupont Circle just yet. But it doesnt seem like a sign of national health that Americas political capital is suddenly richer than our capitals of manufacturing and technology and finance, or that our leaders are more insulated than ever from the trends buffeting the people theyre supposed to serve.
Read more
Column: Are we living in the Hunger Games?