Anti-BDS Bill - Bravo

[Hollie]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

Do you have anything to contribute other than slogans and cliche's?

I was just responding to Israeli lies.

Write a letter of complaint to Hamas.

 

[P F Tinmore]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

Do you have anything to contribute other than slogans and cliche's?

I was just responding to Israeli lies.

Write a letter of complaint to Hamas.

Nice duck.

 

[Phoenall]

BDS Spreads Anti-Semitism Across U.S. Campuses
Where BDS goes, Jew hatred follows.
May 17, 2016
Noah Beck

Reprinted from InvestigativeProject.org.

Anti-Semitic incidents seem to spring up each week on college campuses throughout the United States. According to a study, “The strongest predictor of anti-Jewish hostility on campus” is the presence of a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel. The greater the BDS activity, especially involving faculty members, the more likely anti-Semitic episodes become, said the study issued last month by the AMCHA Initiative, a non-profit organization dedicated to investigating, documenting, and combating anti-Semitism on U.S. campuses.

One recent example occurred on April 15, when the City University of New York Doctoral Students’ Council passed a resolution calling for an academic boycott of Israel, 42-19. Weeks earlier, a CUNY professor and BDS advocate claimed that the killing of Palestinians in Gaza “reflects Jewish values.” On CUNY campuses, the New York Observer reports, Jewish students were harassed, with “Jews out of CUNY” uttered in at least one instance, and a professor who wears a yarmulke was called a “Zionist pig.”

On April 21, two-thirds of a union representing about 2,000 graduate students at New York University voted to approve a motion to support a BDS resolution against Israel. The motion also urges the union and its affiliate, the United Auto Workers, to divest from Israeli companies. The resolution asks NYU to close its program at Tel Aviv University, claiming the program violates NYU’s non-discrimination policy.

About a month earlier, NYU’s Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), one of the main organizing forces behind the nationwide BDS campaign, hosted Israeli academic Ilan Pappé, described by Benny Morris as “one of the world’s sloppiest historians.”

As reported by AMCHA:

...

On campus after campus, the BDS movement has proven itself to be well organized and determined to poison the minds of impressionable students against Israel. It will take an equally concerted and sustained effort to oppose BDS in academia.

BDS Spreads Anti-Semitism Across U.S. Campuses

Anti-Semitic incidents seem to spring up each week on college campuses throughout the United States. According to a study, “The strongest predictor of anti-Jewish hostility on campus” is the presence of a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.​

It is interesting that they did not mention one incidence of antisemitism by any BDS activist.

So your source must be liars.

Because the whole BDS movement is anti semitic, and only ignorant illiterate buffoons see it otherwise. This is why so much legislation is being passed in regards to BDS

 

[Phoenall]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

 

[Phoenall]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

Do you have anything to contribute other than slogans and cliche's?

I was just responding to Israeli lies.

Strange how only you can see these alleged lies, and no one else can. Could it be your meds are not working any more ?

 

[Phoenall]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

Do you have anything to contribute other than slogans and cliche's?

I was just responding to Israeli lies.

Write a letter of complaint to Hamas.

Nice duck.

No duck just a suggestion

 

[P F Tinmore]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

 

[Hollie]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

It is you ducking the question of legitimacy. Overwhelming, it is Islamist nations that "don't recognize" Israel. That's not surprising as those middle eastern nations sharing the pathology of Islamism were commanded by the Islam's inventor to despise non-Moslems.

 

[Phoenall]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

 

[P F Tinmore]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

It is you ducking the question of legitimacy. Overwhelming, it is Islamist nations that "don't recognize" Israel. That's not surprising as those middle eastern nations sharing the pathology of Islamism were commanded by the Islam's inventor to despise non-Moslems.

Of course you have no clue as to why that is.

You need to read up.

 

[P F Tinmore]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

 

[Hollie]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

 

[P F Tinmore]

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

 

[Phoenall]

BDS and Antisemitism


Introduction
Contrary to NGO claims that they are engaging in “legitimate criticism” of Israel, the NGO rhetoric, publications, and activities often violate accepted standards. The rhetoric used in BDS campaigns explicitly violates a number of precepts of the United States State Department Definition of Antisemitism. In particular, BDS activists:

• “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”
• “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”
• “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

BDS epitomizes Natan Sharansky’s “3Ds” of new antisemitism; Demonization, Double Standards, and Delegitimization.

By demonizing, do you mean telling the world what Israel does?

There is no double standard.

Does Israel have any legitimacy?

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

The International laws of 1924 and the right to independence based on their free determination and ability to stand on their own feet. NO OTHER CRITERIA IN PLACE AT THAT TIME

 

[Phoenall]

More than Palestine has as they are full members of the UN, not just observers. And Israel is a recognised nation with UN approval

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Political recognition is different from legitimacy. Some countries recognize Israel, some don't. That is a matter of political opinion.

You are ducking the question of legitimacy.

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

Song and dance is not an answer.

Territorial integrity. Self determination without external interference. The illegality of acquiring territory by force.

 

[Hollie]

No you are ducking the answers because you don't want Israel to exist. The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948, this was accepted by the UN in full council in 1949 giving Israel legitimacy. When did the state of Palestine get its legitimacy, and under what circumstances ? Because some nations don't see Palestine as a state yet, just muslim shenanigans

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

Song and dance is not an answer.

Territorial integrity. Self determination without external interference. The illegality of acquiring territory by force.

The mandate was not acquired by force.

All of your appeals to ignorance regarding the history surrounding establishment of Israel have been addressed more times than anyone can recall.

You simply drone on with silly spam because you're unwilling to accept the failure of Islamists to build anything resembling a functioning society.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Jews followed the rules and declared independence on may 15 1948,​

Did they? What was Israel's legal procedure to acquire the land it sits on?

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

Song and dance is not an answer.

Territorial integrity. Self determination without external interference. The illegality of acquiring territory by force.

The mandate was not acquired by force.

All of your appeals to ignorance regarding the history surrounding establishment of Israel have been addressed more times than anyone can recall.

You simply drone on with silly spam because you're unwilling to accept the failure of Islamists to build anything resembling a functioning society.

The mandate was not acquired by force.​

The Mandate did not create Israel.

 

[Hollie]

How many times has that been addressed for you?

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

Song and dance is not an answer.

Territorial integrity. Self determination without external interference. The illegality of acquiring territory by force.

The mandate was not acquired by force.

All of your appeals to ignorance regarding the history surrounding establishment of Israel have been addressed more times than anyone can recall.

You simply drone on with silly spam because you're unwilling to accept the failure of Islamists to build anything resembling a functioning society.

The mandate was not acquired by force.​

The Mandate did not create Israel.

Correct. As usual, that has all been explained to you before.

What other questions / pointless babble are you going to spam this thread with that has already been explained to you in tedious, excruciating detail.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Never.

LIAR you are told why every week when you ask the same question.

Now here is one for you, under what international law are you declaring Israel's existence to have no legitimacy ?

Song and dance is not an answer.

Territorial integrity. Self determination without external interference. The illegality of acquiring territory by force.

The mandate was not acquired by force.

All of your appeals to ignorance regarding the history surrounding establishment of Israel have been addressed more times than anyone can recall.

You simply drone on with silly spam because you're unwilling to accept the failure of Islamists to build anything resembling a functioning society.

The mandate was not acquired by force.​

The Mandate did not create Israel.

Correct. As usual, that has all been explained to you before.

What other questions / pointless babble are you going to spam this thread with that has already been explained to you in tedious, excruciating detail.

Bullshit Israeli talking points don't explain anything.