Another Republican fesses up about the Benghazi Sham inquisistion..

Rules are supposed to apply to all elected 9and appointed) officials, bubba.

But you libbies imagine that when it is your folks who are doing the screwing around, it's perfectly ok. Especially if you can claim (fairly, validly, dishonestly bogusly, whatever) that the "other guys" have done it, "too."
View attachment 52564

Eyah.

Nice non-sequitur, pal! Bravo. Obviously evasive attempt, but still a valiant effort.

The question was not the number of ensuing investigations over embassy (consulate) attacks.

The TOPIC (just to remind of your OWN post a couple of posts back) was whether rules should apply to Shrillary when they allegedly didn't apply to some GOP examples.

Non-Sequitur would mean one thing had nothing to do with the other.

Oh.

And there's this:




Priorities and Choices..


That is why i noted that your non-sequitur was a non-sequitur.


Except it wasn't.

Thanks for playing.

There are door prizes.

Just see the lovely lady on your way out.


Except, it was. Go get a prize. Let the door hit you on the way out. It might knock some sense into you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top